R v Sheppard,, 2020 ABCA 455
| Judge | The Honourable Madam Justice Patricia Rowbotham,The Honourable Mr. Justice Brian O’Ferrall,The Honourable Madam Justice Jo'Anne Strekaf |
| Citation | 2020 ABCA 455 |
| Date | 11 December 2020 |
| Court | Court of Appeal (Alberta) |
| Docket Number | 1901-0259-A |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
3 practice notes
-
R v HF, 2021 ABPC 68
...the state actors” (Nasogaluak, at para 49). [93] In the recent decision of R v Sheppard, 2020 ABCA 455 (Sheppard), the court discussed whether prolonged administrative segregation could be considered as a mitigating factor in sentencing apart......
-
R v Beaver,
...to deduct a specific, identified quantity of time from the sentences imposed for the Charter breach. As was the case in R v Sheppard, 2020 ABCA 455 at para 19, it is notable that neither defence counsel at the sentencing hearing made submissions on the Charter breach in mitigation of senten......
-
R v Law,
...reluctant to consider entirely new arguments, particularly when there is no factual record from the trial on the issue: R. v Sheppard, 2020 ABCA 455 at para. 19; R. v Marriott, 2014 NSCA 28 at para. 28, 309 CCC (3d) 305. When all factors are considered, the application to admit fresh eviden......
3 cases
-
R v HF, 2021 ABPC 68
...the state actors” (Nasogaluak, at para 49). [93] In the recent decision of R v Sheppard, 2020 ABCA 455 (Sheppard), the court discussed whether prolonged administrative segregation could be considered as a mitigating factor in sentencing apart......
-
R v Beaver,
...to deduct a specific, identified quantity of time from the sentences imposed for the Charter breach. As was the case in R v Sheppard, 2020 ABCA 455 at para 19, it is notable that neither defence counsel at the sentencing hearing made submissions on the Charter breach in mitigation of senten......
-
R v Law,
...reluctant to consider entirely new arguments, particularly when there is no factual record from the trial on the issue: R. v Sheppard, 2020 ABCA 455 at para. 19; R. v Marriott, 2014 NSCA 28 at para. 28, 309 CCC (3d) 305. When all factors are considered, the application to admit fresh eviden......