R v Shilmar, 2017 ABPC 213
| Judge | Honourable Judge B.D. Rosborough |
| Citation | 2017 ABPC 213 |
| Docket Number | 151429628P1 |
| Court | Provincial Court of Alberta (Canada) |
| Date | 21 August 2017 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
7 practice notes
-
R v Sidhu, 2020 ABPC 197
...at para 29; R c Delisle; R v Joanisse at para 76; R v Rhodes at para 14; R v Furtado at para 74(33). [8] In a 2017 decision R v Shilmar, 2017 ABPC 213, Judge Rosborough also does a thorough review of the law regarding ineffective assistance of counsel, particularly related to the issue of t......
-
R v Conway-McDowall, 2019 ABQB 11
...v Brahaney, 2016 ONCJ 395; R v Lavoie 2016 ABQB 497; R v Meister 2014 ABQB 91; R v Moore, 2014 BCPC 135; R v Ng, 2003 ABCA 1; R v Shilmar 2017 ABPC 213; R v Wright, 2011 ABQB 145 and R v Park, 2009 ABQB [22] I have read each of the cases cited by the Crown but do not propose to deal with th......
-
R. v. HOLYNSKI,
...the trial proceeds on that day or not: R v Stacey (1999), 184 Nfld & PEIR 7 (Nfld CA); R v Lavoie, 2016 ABQB 497; R v Shilmar, 2017 ABPC 213; R v T.B., 2018 ABPC 43. There is some attraction to such a simple determination based on a textual reading of the section, but this interpretatio......
-
2023 ABCJ 141,
...Jury where the potential punishment can be five years or more. 68 As note by Judge Rosborough (as he then was) in the case of R v Shilmar 2017 ABPC 213 at paragraph 60: “Trial by jury is the Accused person's ‘right’ or ‘benefit’; it is not his obligat......
Request a trial to view additional results
7 cases
-
R v Sidhu, 2020 ABPC 197
...at para 29; R c Delisle; R v Joanisse at para 76; R v Rhodes at para 14; R v Furtado at para 74(33). [8] In a 2017 decision R v Shilmar, 2017 ABPC 213, Judge Rosborough also does a thorough review of the law regarding ineffective assistance of counsel, particularly related to the issue of t......
-
R v Conway-McDowall, 2019 ABQB 11
...v Brahaney, 2016 ONCJ 395; R v Lavoie 2016 ABQB 497; R v Meister 2014 ABQB 91; R v Moore, 2014 BCPC 135; R v Ng, 2003 ABCA 1; R v Shilmar 2017 ABPC 213; R v Wright, 2011 ABQB 145 and R v Park, 2009 ABQB [22] I have read each of the cases cited by the Crown but do not propose to deal with th......
-
R. v. HOLYNSKI,
...the trial proceeds on that day or not: R v Stacey (1999), 184 Nfld & PEIR 7 (Nfld CA); R v Lavoie, 2016 ABQB 497; R v Shilmar, 2017 ABPC 213; R v T.B., 2018 ABPC 43. There is some attraction to such a simple determination based on a textual reading of the section, but this interpretatio......
-
2023 ABCJ 141,
...Jury where the potential punishment can be five years or more. 68 As note by Judge Rosborough (as he then was) in the case of R v Shilmar 2017 ABPC 213 at paragraph 60: “Trial by jury is the Accused person's ‘right’ or ‘benefit’; it is not his obligat......
Request a trial to view additional results