R. v. Skakun (B.), [2012] B.C.T.C. Uned. 1103

JurisdictionBritish Columbia
JudgeRomilly, J.
Citation[2012] B.C.T.C. Uned. 1103,2012 BCSC 1103,[2012] B.C.T.C. Uned. 1103 (SC)
CourtSupreme Court of British Columbia (Canada)
Subject MatterCOURTS,CRIMINAL LAW,PRACTICE
Date24 July 2012
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
2 practice notes
  • R. v. Richter (M.A.), [2012] B.C.T.C. Uned. 1995 (SC)
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada)
    • 17 Diciembre 2012
    ...759, at para. 77. Conversely, a judge sitting alone has no obligation to consider a defence lacking an air of reality: R. v. Skakun , 2012 BCSC 1103, at para. 21. [58] A defence has an air of reality where there is evidence upon which a properly instructed jury acting reasonably could acqui......
  • Saanich (District) v. Visser Van Ijzendoorn, 2017 BCSC 2292
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada)
    • 30 Noviembre 2017
    ...court was not capable of supporting the factual conclusions it made. It is not open to me to reassess the facts themselves: R. v. Skakun, 2012 BCSC 1103 at para. 11.[4]                In his notice of appeal, Mr. Visser states 17 ground......
2 cases
  • R. v. Richter (M.A.), [2012] B.C.T.C. Uned. 1995 (SC)
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada)
    • 17 Diciembre 2012
    ...759, at para. 77. Conversely, a judge sitting alone has no obligation to consider a defence lacking an air of reality: R. v. Skakun , 2012 BCSC 1103, at para. 21. [58] A defence has an air of reality where there is evidence upon which a properly instructed jury acting reasonably could acqui......
  • Saanich (District) v. Visser Van Ijzendoorn, 2017 BCSC 2292
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada)
    • 30 Noviembre 2017
    ...court was not capable of supporting the factual conclusions it made. It is not open to me to reassess the facts themselves: R. v. Skakun, 2012 BCSC 1103 at para. 11.[4]                In his notice of appeal, Mr. Visser states 17 ground......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT