R. v. Skakun (B.), [2012] B.C.T.C. Uned. 1103
| Jurisdiction | British Columbia |
| Judge | Romilly, J. |
| Court | Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada) |
| Subject Matter | COURTS,CRIMINAL LAW,PRACTICE |
| Citation | [2012] B.C.T.C. Uned. 1103,2012 BCSC 1103,[2012] B.C.T.C. Uned. 1103 (SC) |
| Date | 24 July 2012 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
2 practice notes
-
R. v. Richter (M.A.), [2012] B.C.T.C. Uned. 1995 (SC)
...759, at para. 77. Conversely, a judge sitting alone has no obligation to consider a defence lacking an air of reality: R. v. Skakun , 2012 BCSC 1103, at para. 21. [58] A defence has an air of reality where there is evidence upon which a properly instructed jury acting reasonably could acqui......
-
Saanich (District) v. Visser Van Ijzendoorn, 2017 BCSC 2292
...court was not capable of supporting the factual conclusions it made. It is not open to me to reassess the facts themselves: R. v. Skakun, 2012 BCSC 1103 at para. 11.[4] In his notice of appeal, Mr. Visser states 17 ground......
2 cases
-
R. v. Richter (M.A.), [2012] B.C.T.C. Uned. 1995 (SC)
...759, at para. 77. Conversely, a judge sitting alone has no obligation to consider a defence lacking an air of reality: R. v. Skakun , 2012 BCSC 1103, at para. 21. [58] A defence has an air of reality where there is evidence upon which a properly instructed jury acting reasonably could acqui......
-
Saanich (District) v. Visser Van Ijzendoorn, 2017 BCSC 2292
...court was not capable of supporting the factual conclusions it made. It is not open to me to reassess the facts themselves: R. v. Skakun, 2012 BCSC 1103 at para. 11.[4] In his notice of appeal, Mr. Visser states 17 ground......