R. v. Slatter, 2018 ONCA 962
| Jurisdiction | Ontario |
| Judge | Watt,van Rensburg,Fairburn |
| Citation | 2018 ONCA 962 |
| Court | Court of Appeal (Ontario) |
| Docket Number | C60596 |
| Date | 29 December 2018 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
7 practice notes
-
Table of cases
...589 R v Skrzydlewski (1995), 103 CCC (3d) 467 (Ont CA) ..................................... 243 R v Slatter, 2018 ONCA 962 ................................................................................541 R v Smith (1991), 4 CR (4th) 125 (SCC)...................................................
-
Methods of Presenting Evidence
...Section 6, “Challenging the Credibility of Your Own Witness.” 61 R v McCarroll , 2008 ONCA 715. 62 Rose , above note 43. 63 R v Slatter , 2018 ONCA 962 at para 48. In Slatter , the Crown failed to do so, but this error was harmless; the witness was adverse and therefore would have been show......
-
R v PO,
...the case and not to some stereotypical understanding” (Quartey at para 3). See also R. v. G.H., 2018 ONCA 349, at para. 5; R v Slatter, 2018 ONCA 962 at paras 113-115 and R. v. F.B.P., 2019 ONCA 157, at para. 9, referred to in R. v. Cepic, 2019 ONCA 541 at para 20. [189] The importance of t......
-
R. v. Gibson,
...a trial judge is under no obligation to resolve every conflict in the evidence adduced at trial: R.E.M., at para. 20; R. v. Slatter, 2018 ONCA 962, 369 C.C.C. (3d) 112, at para. 102; and R. v. Stark (2004), 190 C.C.C. (3d) 496 (Ont. C.A.), at para. [58] T......
Request a trial to view additional results
5 cases
-
R v PO,
...the case and not to some stereotypical understanding” (Quartey at para 3). See also R. v. G.H., 2018 ONCA 349, at para. 5; R v Slatter, 2018 ONCA 962 at paras 113-115 and R. v. F.B.P., 2019 ONCA 157, at para. 9, referred to in R. v. Cepic, 2019 ONCA 541 at para 20. [189] The importance of t......
-
R. v. Gibson,
...a trial judge is under no obligation to resolve every conflict in the evidence adduced at trial: R.E.M., at para. 20; R. v. Slatter, 2018 ONCA 962, 369 C.C.C. (3d) 112, at para. 102; and R. v. Stark (2004), 190 C.C.C. (3d) 496 (Ont. C.A.), at para. [58] T......
-
R. v. Dupuis,
...memory and not an improper cross-examination based on a prior inconsistent statement. The respondent asserts that, as in R. v. Slatter, 2018 ONCA 962, 369 C.C.C. (3d) 112, it would be wrong to allow the appeal based on procedural irregularities in the Crown’s refreshing memory of a w......
-
Spadacini-Kelava v. Kelava, 2020 ONSC 5561
...by a witness ... [95] The Ontario Court of Appeal summed up the present state of the law in regard to demeanor evidence in R. v. Slater, 2018 ONCA 962, stating at para 74 that demeanor evidence “…is merely one factor to be considered in assessing credibility and not to be given undue weight......
Request a trial to view additional results
2 books & journal articles
-
Table of cases
...589 R v Skrzydlewski (1995), 103 CCC (3d) 467 (Ont CA) ..................................... 243 R v Slatter, 2018 ONCA 962 ................................................................................541 R v Smith (1991), 4 CR (4th) 125 (SCC)...................................................
-
Methods of Presenting Evidence
...Section 6, “Challenging the Credibility of Your Own Witness.” 61 R v McCarroll , 2008 ONCA 715. 62 Rose , above note 43. 63 R v Slatter , 2018 ONCA 962 at para 48. In Slatter , the Crown failed to do so, but this error was harmless; the witness was adverse and therefore would have been show......