R. v. Slatter, 2018 ONCA 962

JurisdictionOntario
JudgeWatt,van Rensburg,Fairburn
Citation2018 ONCA 962
Docket NumberC60596
CourtCourt of Appeal (Ontario)
Date29 December 2018
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
7 practice notes
  • Table of cases
    • Canada
    • Irwin Books The Law of Evidence. Eighth Edition
    • 25 Giugno 2020
    ...589 R v Skrzydlewski (1995), 103 CCC (3d) 467 (Ont CA) ..................................... 243 R v Slatter, 2018 ONCA 962 ................................................................................541 R v Smith (1991), 4 CR (4th) 125 (SCC)...................................................
  • Methods of Presenting Evidence
    • Canada
    • Irwin Books The Law of Evidence. Eighth Edition
    • 25 Giugno 2020
    ...Section 6, “Challenging the Credibility of Your Own Witness.” 61 R v McCarroll , 2008 ONCA 715. 62 Rose , above note 43. 63 R v Slatter , 2018 ONCA 962 at para 48. In Slatter , the Crown failed to do so, but this error was harmless; the witness was adverse and therefore would have been show......
  • R v PO, 2021 ABQB 318
    • Canada
    • Court of Queen's Bench of Alberta (Canada)
    • 21 Aprile 2021
    ...the case and not to some stereotypical understanding” (Quartey at para 3). See also R. v. G.H., 2018 ONCA 349, at para. 5; R v Slatter, 2018 ONCA 962 at paras 113-115 and R. v. F.B.P., 2019 ONCA 157, at para. 9, referred to in R. v. Cepic, 2019 ONCA 541 at para 20. [189] The importance of t......
  • R. v. Gibson, 2021 ONCA 530
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (Ontario)
    • 23 Luglio 2021
    ...a trial judge is under no obligation to resolve every conflict in the evidence adduced at trial: R.E.M., at para. 20; R. v. Slatter, 2018 ONCA 962, 369 C.C.C. (3d) 112, at para. 102; and R. v. Stark (2004), 190 C.C.C. (3d) 496 (Ont. C.A.), at para. [58]       T......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
5 cases
  • R v PO,
    • Canada
    • Court of Queen's Bench of Alberta (Canada)
    • 21 Aprile 2021
    ...the case and not to some stereotypical understanding” (Quartey at para 3). See also R. v. G.H., 2018 ONCA 349, at para. 5; R v Slatter, 2018 ONCA 962 at paras 113-115 and R. v. F.B.P., 2019 ONCA 157, at para. 9, referred to in R. v. Cepic, 2019 ONCA 541 at para 20. [189] The importance of t......
  • R. v. Gibson,
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (Ontario)
    • 23 Luglio 2021
    ...a trial judge is under no obligation to resolve every conflict in the evidence adduced at trial: R.E.M., at para. 20; R. v. Slatter, 2018 ONCA 962, 369 C.C.C. (3d) 112, at para. 102; and R. v. Stark (2004), 190 C.C.C. (3d) 496 (Ont. C.A.), at para. [58]       T......
  • R. v. Dupuis,
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (Ontario)
    • 16 Dicembre 2020
    ...memory and not an improper cross-examination based on a prior inconsistent statement. The respondent asserts that, as in R. v. Slatter, 2018 ONCA 962, 369 C.C.C. (3d) 112, it would be wrong to allow the appeal based on procedural irregularities in the Crown’s refreshing memory of a w......
  • Spadacini-Kelava v. Kelava, 2020 ONSC 5561
    • Canada
    • Superior Court of Justice of Ontario (Canada)
    • 16 Settembre 2020
    ...by a witness ... [95] The Ontario Court of Appeal summed up the present state of the law in regard to demeanor evidence in R. v. Slater, 2018 ONCA 962, stating at para 74 that demeanor evidence “…is merely one factor to be considered in assessing credibility and not to be given undue weight......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
2 books & journal articles
  • Table of cases
    • Canada
    • Irwin Books The Law of Evidence. Eighth Edition
    • 25 Giugno 2020
    ...589 R v Skrzydlewski (1995), 103 CCC (3d) 467 (Ont CA) ..................................... 243 R v Slatter, 2018 ONCA 962 ................................................................................541 R v Smith (1991), 4 CR (4th) 125 (SCC)...................................................
  • Methods of Presenting Evidence
    • Canada
    • Irwin Books The Law of Evidence. Eighth Edition
    • 25 Giugno 2020
    ...Section 6, “Challenging the Credibility of Your Own Witness.” 61 R v McCarroll , 2008 ONCA 715. 62 Rose , above note 43. 63 R v Slatter , 2018 ONCA 962 at para 48. In Slatter , the Crown failed to do so, but this error was harmless; the witness was adverse and therefore would have been show......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT