R. v. Smyth (H.H.), 2015 CRIM 18
| Jurisdiction | Saskatchewan |
| Judge | Kalmakoff, J. |
| Court | Court of Queen's Bench of Saskatchewan (Canada) |
| Subject Matter | EVIDENCE,CRIMINAL LAW |
| Citation | 2015 CRIM 18,2016 SKQB 214 |
| Date | 21 June 2016 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
3 practice notes
-
R. v. Renz (T.), 2016 SKQB 266
...of impairment establishes any degree of impairment ranging from slight to great, the offence has been made out. [20] In R v Smyth , 2016 SKQB 214, Kalmakoff J. summarized the correct legal test for proof of impairment when there are factors other than alcohol to account for the accused's im......
-
R. v. Kerpan,
...a completely straight line but subtly changed direction or swayed as she walked. [108] In R v Smyth, 2016 SKQB 214 at para 35, Kalmakoff J, as he then was, on appeal stated that proof of impaired driving ability does not require evidence of gross physical......
-
R. v. Joyce, 2017 NSPC 81
...by a level of alcohol or drug consumption in ways that are not exhibited manifestly in walking, talking or driving: R. v. Smyth, 2016 SKQB 214 at para. [33] I am able to glean from these cases the following generally accepted criteria for proof of the objective element of driving while impa......
3 cases
-
R. v. Renz (T.), 2016 SKQB 266
...of impairment establishes any degree of impairment ranging from slight to great, the offence has been made out. [20] In R v Smyth , 2016 SKQB 214, Kalmakoff J. summarized the correct legal test for proof of impairment when there are factors other than alcohol to account for the accused's im......
-
R. v. Kerpan,
...a completely straight line but subtly changed direction or swayed as she walked. [108] In R v Smyth, 2016 SKQB 214 at para 35, Kalmakoff J, as he then was, on appeal stated that proof of impaired driving ability does not require evidence of gross physical......
-
R. v. Joyce, 2017 NSPC 81
...by a level of alcohol or drug consumption in ways that are not exhibited manifestly in walking, talking or driving: R. v. Smyth, 2016 SKQB 214 at para. [33] I am able to glean from these cases the following generally accepted criteria for proof of the objective element of driving while impa......