R. v. So
| Jurisdiction | British Columbia |
| Court | Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada) |
| Judge | Honourable Madam Justice Dillon |
| Neutral Citation | 2021 BCSC 672 |
| Citation | 2021 BCSC 672 |
| Date | 12 April 2021 |
| Docket Number | 27332 |
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeUnlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Start Your 7-day Trial
4 practice notes
-
R v So
...but convicted of the included offence of manslaughter. 6 In lengthy, detailed and fact-laden reasons for judgment (“RFJ”) indexed as 2021 BCSC 672, the trial judge rejected the automatism defence. She found that the appellant, despite his consumption of alcohol, stabbed Kim with murderous 7......
-
R. v. Clayton
...with skepticism”. [17] Such an adverse inference was drawn in R. v. Aday, 2008 BCSC 397; R. v. G.C.Z., 2015 BCSC 1596; and R. v. So, 2021 BCSC 672. In So the court [161] …The weight of the Crown’s evidence would be unfairly diminished if its experts have been denied access to the accused wh......
-
R v Clayton
...with skepticism”. 17 Such an adverse inference was drawn in R. v. Aday, 2008 BCSC 397; R. v. G.C.Z., 2015 BCSC 1596; and R. v. So, 2021 BCSC 672. In So the court observed: [161] …The weight of the Crown's evidence would be unfairly diminished if its experts have been denied access to the ac......
-
R. v. Jafroudi
...the probable consequences of his acts, proceeded recklessly in the face of such risk (R. v. Scott, 2019 BCSC 313 at para. 469; R. v. So, 2021 BCSC 672 at para. 188). The court must consider all of the evidence surrounding the shooting and not just the instant that the trigger is pulled and ......
4 cases
-
R v So
...but convicted of the included offence of manslaughter. 6 In lengthy, detailed and fact-laden reasons for judgment (“RFJ”) indexed as 2021 BCSC 672, the trial judge rejected the automatism defence. She found that the appellant, despite his consumption of alcohol, stabbed Kim with murderous 7......
-
R. v. Clayton
...with skepticism”. [17] Such an adverse inference was drawn in R. v. Aday, 2008 BCSC 397; R. v. G.C.Z., 2015 BCSC 1596; and R. v. So, 2021 BCSC 672. In So the court [161] …The weight of the Crown’s evidence would be unfairly diminished if its experts have been denied access to the accused wh......
-
R v Clayton
...with skepticism”. 17 Such an adverse inference was drawn in R. v. Aday, 2008 BCSC 397; R. v. G.C.Z., 2015 BCSC 1596; and R. v. So, 2021 BCSC 672. In So the court observed: [161] …The weight of the Crown's evidence would be unfairly diminished if its experts have been denied access to the ac......
-
R. v. Jafroudi
...the probable consequences of his acts, proceeded recklessly in the face of such risk (R. v. Scott, 2019 BCSC 313 at para. 469; R. v. So, 2021 BCSC 672 at para. 188). The court must consider all of the evidence surrounding the shooting and not just the instant that the trigger is pulled and ......
