R v Soosay, 2020 ABQB 748

JurisdictionAlberta
JudgeHonourable Mr. Justice W.N. Renke
Docket Number180653420Q1
Citation2020 ABQB 748
CourtCourt of Queen's Bench of Alberta (Canada)
Date04 December 2020
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
8 practice notes
  • R v Abdulkadir,
    • Canada
    • Court of Queen's Bench of Alberta (Canada)
    • November 7, 2022
    ...and that’s for identical twins who ... genetically speaking ... would be considered clones. [I refer as well to R v Soosay, 2020 ABQB 748 at para [251]      Humans have 23 pairs of chromosomes. One member of each pair comes from the father, the other from the......
  • R v Bennett,
    • Canada
    • Court of Queen's Bench of Alberta (Canada)
    • March 19, 2021
    ...just because it is impossible to exclude it entirely. The law does not require such proof to absolute certainty .... [29] In R v Soosay, 2020 ABQB 748 at para 20, Justice Renke provided further additional guidance in relation to Justice Cromwell’s warning to avoid [20] ... Providing a defin......
  • R v Soosay,
    • Canada
    • Court of Queen's Bench of Alberta (Canada)
    • June 30, 2021
    ...30, 2020 I convicted Mr. Soosay of second degree murder for the killing of Johnathan Nepoose. The trial was by judge alone: R v Soosay, 2020 ABQB 748 (the Trial [2]           I must determine the period of parole ineligibility for Mr. Soosay......
  • R. v. Wint,
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court of Nova Scotia (Canada)
    • March 23, 2023
    ...inference must recognize (and be based on a reasonable view of) the actual evidence or absence of evidence.  In R. v Soosay, 2020 ABQB 748, Renke, J. made the following pithy observation: “It may be significant that the dog did not bark, but only if the dog was there (or should ......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
8 cases
  • R v Abdulkadir,
    • Canada
    • Court of Queen's Bench of Alberta (Canada)
    • November 7, 2022
    ...and that’s for identical twins who ... genetically speaking ... would be considered clones. [I refer as well to R v Soosay, 2020 ABQB 748 at para [251]      Humans have 23 pairs of chromosomes. One member of each pair comes from the father, the other from the......
  • R v Bennett,
    • Canada
    • Court of Queen's Bench of Alberta (Canada)
    • March 19, 2021
    ...just because it is impossible to exclude it entirely. The law does not require such proof to absolute certainty .... [29] In R v Soosay, 2020 ABQB 748 at para 20, Justice Renke provided further additional guidance in relation to Justice Cromwell’s warning to avoid [20] ... Providing a defin......
  • R v Soosay,
    • Canada
    • Court of Queen's Bench of Alberta (Canada)
    • June 30, 2021
    ...30, 2020 I convicted Mr. Soosay of second degree murder for the killing of Johnathan Nepoose. The trial was by judge alone: R v Soosay, 2020 ABQB 748 (the Trial [2]           I must determine the period of parole ineligibility for Mr. Soosay......
  • R. v. Wint,
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court of Nova Scotia (Canada)
    • March 23, 2023
    ...inference must recognize (and be based on a reasonable view of) the actual evidence or absence of evidence.  In R. v Soosay, 2020 ABQB 748, Renke, J. made the following pithy observation: “It may be significant that the dog did not bark, but only if the dog was there (or should ......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT