R v Soosay

JurisdictionAlberta
CourtCourt of Queen's Bench of Alberta (Canada)
JudgeHonourable Mr. Justice W.N. Renke
Citation2020 ABQB 748
Date04 December 2020
Docket Number180653420Q1

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex
11 practice notes
  • Table of Cases
    • Canada
    • Criminal Law Series Qualifying and Challenging Expert Evidence Appendixes
    • May 2, 2022
    .... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 176 Soosay , R v , 2020 ABQB 748 ............................................................ 170 SP , R v , 2010 ONCA 696 ........................................................
  • Police Experts
    • Canada
    • Criminal Law Series Qualifying and Challenging Expert Evidence Part II - Specific Types of Expert Evidence
    • May 2, 2022
    ...the authors also suggest a fourth miscellaneous category for stains that do not fit neatly into the three traditional groupings. 122 2020 ABQB 748. 123 Ibid at para 271. © [2022] Emond Montgomery Publications. All Rights Reserved. Chapter 7 Police Experts 171 A. Relevance of Bloodstain Patt......
  • R v Abdulkadir, 2022 ABKB 700
    • Canada
    • Court of Queen's Bench of Alberta (Canada)
    • November 7, 2022
    ...and that’s for identical twins who ... genetically speaking ... would be considered clones. [I refer as well to R v Soosay, 2020 ABQB 748 at para [251]      Humans have 23 pairs of chromosomes. One member of each pair comes from the father, the other from the......
  • R v Bennett, 2021 ABQB 206
    • Canada
    • Court of Queen's Bench of Alberta (Canada)
    • March 19, 2021
    ...just because it is impossible to exclude it entirely. The law does not require such proof to absolute certainty .... [29] In R v Soosay, 2020 ABQB 748 at para 20, Justice Renke provided further additional guidance in relation to Justice Cromwell’s warning to avoid [20] ... Providing a defin......
  • Get Started for Free
7 cases
  • R v Abdulkadir
    • Canada
    • Court of King's Bench of Alberta (Canada)
    • November 7, 2022
    ...and that’s for identical twins who ... genetically speaking ... would be considered clones. [I refer as well to R v Soosay, 2020 ABQB 748 at para [251]      Humans have 23 pairs of chromosomes. One member of each pair comes from the father, the other from the......
  • R v Bennett
    • Canada
    • Court of Queen's Bench of Alberta (Canada)
    • March 19, 2021
    ...just because it is impossible to exclude it entirely. The law does not require such proof to absolute certainty .... [29] In R v Soosay, 2020 ABQB 748 at para 20, Justice Renke provided further additional guidance in relation to Justice Cromwell’s warning to avoid [20] ... Providing a defin......
  • R v Soosay
    • Canada
    • Court of Queen's Bench of Alberta (Canada)
    • June 30, 2021
    ...30, 2020 I convicted Mr. Soosay of second degree murder for the killing of Johnathan Nepoose. The trial was by judge alone: R v Soosay, 2020 ABQB 748 (the Trial [2]           I must determine the period of parole ineligibility for Mr. Soosay......
  • R. v. Wint
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court of Nova Scotia (Canada)
    • March 23, 2023
    ...inference must recognize (and be based on a reasonable view of) the actual evidence or absence of evidence.  In R. v Soosay, 2020 ABQB 748, Renke, J. made the following pithy observation: “It may be significant that the dog did not bark, but only if the dog was there (or should ......
  • Get Started for Free
2 books & journal articles
  • Table of Cases
    • Canada
    • Criminal Law Series Qualifying and Challenging Expert Evidence Appendixes
    • May 2, 2022
    .... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 176 Soosay , R v , 2020 ABQB 748 ............................................................ 170 SP , R v , 2010 ONCA 696 ........................................................
  • Police Experts
    • Canada
    • Criminal Law Series Qualifying and Challenging Expert Evidence Part II - Specific Types of Expert Evidence
    • May 2, 2022
    ...the authors also suggest a fourth miscellaneous category for stains that do not fit neatly into the three traditional groupings. 122 2020 ABQB 748. 123 Ibid at para 271. © [2022] Emond Montgomery Publications. All Rights Reserved. Chapter 7 Police Experts 171 A. Relevance of Bloodstain Patt......