R. v. Stanford, 2017 BCSC 530

JurisdictionBritish Columbia
JudgeThe Honourable Justice Russell
Citation2017 BCSC 530
Date30 January 2017
CourtSupreme Court of British Columbia (Canada)
Docket Number39560
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
4 practice notes
  • R. v. Chol, 2017 BCSC 1709
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada)
    • August 10, 2017
    ...or provocation, whether or not those were accepted by the jury as defences (see R. v. Ansari, 2009 BCCA 381, para. 39; R. v. Stanford, 2017 BCSC 530; R. v. Brisson, 2009 BCSC · he pleaded guilty to the firearms offence on April 5, 2017; no trial was necessary for that offence; · he accepted......
  • R. v. Maulen,
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada)
    • March 11, 2022
    ...of cases reflecting, to one degree or another, circumstances that perhaps resemble the case at bar. These cases include R. v. Stanford, 2017 BCSC 530; R. v. Feng, 2015 BCSC 1447; R. v. Johnny (1994), 46 B.C.A.C. 213; R. v. Alphonse, 2018 BCSC 2045; R. v. Vikilani, 2017 BCSC 2074; and R. v. ......
  • R. v. Golar, 2018 BCSC 2329
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada)
    • October 1, 2018
    ...was out of character, and at para. 27 that the offender had never put a foot wrong before.  Similarly, in R. v. Stanford, 2017 BCSC 530, specific deterrence was not a factor.  At para. 20, the trial judge stated “the offence came through an unfortunate confluence ......
  • R. v. Mueller,
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada)
    • March 5, 2021
    ...R. v. Huth, 2014 BCSC 570; 7.    R. v. Nguyen, 2017 BCSC 1669; and 8.    R. v. Stanford, 2017 BCSC 530. R. v. Nguyen, 2017 BCSC 1669; and 8.    R. v. Stanford, 2017 BCSC 530. ...
4 cases
  • R. v. Chol, 2017 BCSC 1709
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada)
    • August 10, 2017
    ...or provocation, whether or not those were accepted by the jury as defences (see R. v. Ansari, 2009 BCCA 381, para. 39; R. v. Stanford, 2017 BCSC 530; R. v. Brisson, 2009 BCSC · he pleaded guilty to the firearms offence on April 5, 2017; no trial was necessary for that offence; · he accepted......
  • R. v. Maulen,
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada)
    • March 11, 2022
    ...of cases reflecting, to one degree or another, circumstances that perhaps resemble the case at bar. These cases include R. v. Stanford, 2017 BCSC 530; R. v. Feng, 2015 BCSC 1447; R. v. Johnny (1994), 46 B.C.A.C. 213; R. v. Alphonse, 2018 BCSC 2045; R. v. Vikilani, 2017 BCSC 2074; and R. v. ......
  • R. v. Golar, 2018 BCSC 2329
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada)
    • October 1, 2018
    ...was out of character, and at para. 27 that the offender had never put a foot wrong before.  Similarly, in R. v. Stanford, 2017 BCSC 530, specific deterrence was not a factor.  At para. 20, the trial judge stated “the offence came through an unfortunate confluence ......
  • R. v. Mueller,
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada)
    • March 5, 2021
    ...R. v. Huth, 2014 BCSC 570; 7.    R. v. Nguyen, 2017 BCSC 1669; and 8.    R. v. Stanford, 2017 BCSC 530. R. v. Nguyen, 2017 BCSC 1669; and 8.    R. v. Stanford, 2017 BCSC 530. ...

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT