R. v. Stang (C.B.), [2012] A.R. Uned. 758 (PC)
| Judge | Cummings, P.C.J. |
| Court | Provincial Court of Alberta (Canada) |
| Subject Matter | CRIMINAL LAW |
| Citation | [2012] A.R. Uned. 758 (PC),[2012] A.R. Uned. 758,2012 ABPC 288 |
| Date | 19 October 2012 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
4 practice notes
-
R. v. Vivian (A.R.), 2012 ABPC 331
...No. 154 , R. v. Rickett , [2012] A.J. No.154 (Alta. Prov.Ct.); R. v. Gordon- Briezke , [2012] A.J. No. 864 (Alta. Prov. Ct.); R. v. Stang 2012 ABPC 288 (Alta. Prov. Ct.). Did the Officer Have Objective Reasonable Grounds to Believe That he was Using an ASD? [66] I prefer following the Gundy......
-
R v PMB,
...includes both truthfulness and accuracy: . . . Leading Questions Used to Elicit Testimony [101] In R v Stang, 2012 ABPC 288, my Learned Colleague, Cummings PCJ., canvassed the law relating to leading questions used to elicit testimony. [102] A......
-
R v Oar, 2018 ABPC 245
...and the conflicting case law, has been extensively explored and discussed in such decisions as R v Winters, 2011 ABPC 327, R v Stang, 2012 ABPC 288, and R v Miller, 2013 ABPC 7. I agree with the following approach: the court must be satisfied that the officer believed he was using an approv......
-
R v PMB,
...includes both truthfulness and accuracy: . . . Leading Questions Used to Elicit Testimony [102] In R v Stang, 2012 ABPC 288, my Learned Colleague, Cummings PCJ., canvassed the law relating to leading questions used to elicit testimony. [103] A......
4 cases
-
R. v. Vivian (A.R.), 2012 ABPC 331
...No. 154 , R. v. Rickett , [2012] A.J. No.154 (Alta. Prov.Ct.); R. v. Gordon- Briezke , [2012] A.J. No. 864 (Alta. Prov. Ct.); R. v. Stang 2012 ABPC 288 (Alta. Prov. Ct.). Did the Officer Have Objective Reasonable Grounds to Believe That he was Using an ASD? [66] I prefer following the Gundy......
-
R v PMB,
...includes both truthfulness and accuracy: . . . Leading Questions Used to Elicit Testimony [101] In R v Stang, 2012 ABPC 288, my Learned Colleague, Cummings PCJ., canvassed the law relating to leading questions used to elicit testimony. [102] A......
-
R v Oar, 2018 ABPC 245
...and the conflicting case law, has been extensively explored and discussed in such decisions as R v Winters, 2011 ABPC 327, R v Stang, 2012 ABPC 288, and R v Miller, 2013 ABPC 7. I agree with the following approach: the court must be satisfied that the officer believed he was using an approv......
-
R v PMB,
...includes both truthfulness and accuracy: . . . Leading Questions Used to Elicit Testimony [102] In R v Stang, 2012 ABPC 288, my Learned Colleague, Cummings PCJ., canvassed the law relating to leading questions used to elicit testimony. [103] A......