R. v.Stengel, 2021 ONSC 1413
| Jurisdiction | Ontario |
| Judge | EDWARDS RSJ |
| Docket Number | CR-20-000020 |
| Date | 23 February 2021 |
| Court | Superior Court of Justice of Ontario (Canada) |
| Citation | 2021 ONSC 1413 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
2 practice notes
-
R. v. C.T.B.,
...R. v. Windebank, 2021 ONCA 157 (leave to appeal requested but not yet granted [2021] S.C.C.A. No. 122), paras. 18-31, and R. v. Stengel, 2021 ONSC 1413, paras. 14-18. [41] At the time this appeal was heard, the only case on point counsel could identify was R v. Stengel, 2020 ONCJ 491. In St......
-
R. v. S.S.,
...penalty or forfeiture incurred under the enactment so repealed”. The review judge also relied on the decision in R. v. Stengel, 2021 ONSC 1413, which had dealt with the same issue. The judge in that case had concluded, relying in part on s. 43, that the accused person was not entitle......
2 cases
-
R. v. C.T.B.,
...R. v. Windebank, 2021 ONCA 157 (leave to appeal requested but not yet granted [2021] S.C.C.A. No. 122), paras. 18-31, and R. v. Stengel, 2021 ONSC 1413, paras. 14-18. [41] At the time this appeal was heard, the only case on point counsel could identify was R v. Stengel, 2020 ONCJ 491. In St......
-
R. v. S.S.,
...penalty or forfeiture incurred under the enactment so repealed”. The review judge also relied on the decision in R. v. Stengel, 2021 ONSC 1413, which had dealt with the same issue. The judge in that case had concluded, relying in part on s. 43, that the accused person was not entitle......