R v Stephan
| Court | Court of Appeal (Alberta) |
| Judge | The Honourable Chief Justice Catherine Fraser,The Honourable Madam Justice Marina Paperny,The Honourable Mr. Justice Peter Martin |
| Neutral Citation | 2021 ABCA 82 |
| Citation | 2021 ABCA 82 |
| Date | 08 March 2021 |
| Docket Number | 1901-0313A; 1901-0314A |
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeUnlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Start Your 7-day Trial
11 practice notes
-
Opinion Evidence
...28. 251 K, A , supra note 2 at para 73; Bruff‑Murphy , ibid at paras 62-64. 252 Abbey 2009 , supra note 3 at para 77. 253 R v Stephan , 2021 ABCA 82 at paras 120-30; R v SL , 2020 ONSC 4036 at para 79: It was difficult to “ distinguish what evidence applied to which argument, since the defe......
-
The Prohibited Act, or Actus Reus
...Rather, the ofence as written only requires that the failure to act would endanger life or permanently endanger health. R v Stephan , 2021 ABCA 82 at paras 63–64 and 69. 163 R v Naglik , [1993] 3 SCR 122. 164 Code , above note 3, s 219. 165 Ibid , ss 222(5)(a)–(b). CRIMINAL LAW 134 Those wh......
-
Table of cases
...133 R v Stephan, 2018 SCC 21 .......................................................................... 133, 486 R v Stephan, 2021 ABCA 82 ............................................................................... 133 Table of Cases 637 R v Stephens (1991), 27 MVR (2d) 24 (Ont CA) ..........
-
Table of Cases
...(CA) .................................... 307 Stephan , R v , 2017 ABCA 380, rev’d 2018 SCC 21, retried 2019 ABQB 715, new trial ordered 2021 ABCA 82 , leave to appeal to the SCC dismissed, [2021] SCCA No 161 (QL) .... 334, 337, 347-48 © [2023] Emond Montgomery Publications. All Rights Rese......
Get Started for Free
7 cases
-
R v Cormier
...of a trial judge which gives rise to a reasonable apprehension of bias renders the trial unfair and the verdict cannot stand: R v Stephan, 2021 ABCA 82 at para 5; R v SRD, 1997 CanLII 324, [1997] 3 SCR 484, at paras 94, 57 As noted earlier, the standard of review where apprehension of bias ......
-
R v Morgan
...submits to be a proper range of sentence, the appellant's counsel refers to Beatty and to the decision of this Court in R v Stephan, 2021 ABCA 82 at para 102, 402 CCC (3d) 73, (not a driving offence) to underline the difference between dangerous operation causing death as an offence and cri......
-
Emmons v Alberta (Workers' Compensation Board)
...be considered in the context of the circumstances, and in light of the whole proceeding”: R v S(RD), [1997] 3 SCR 484 at 541; R v Stephan, 2021 ABCA 82 at para 25 The appellant's first argument in support of the bias allegation is that, near the start of the hearing, the chambers judge comm......
-
2025 ABCJ 149
...leave to appeal to SCC refused, 38445 (April 11, 2019). 8 Wang, supra, at para 6. 9 JLZ v CMZ, 2021 ABCA 200, at para 31. 10 R v Stephan, 2021 ABCA 82, leave to appeal to SCC refused, 39666 and 39667 (August 4, 2022), at para 110. 11 Stephan, supra, at para 111. 12 Zak v Zak, 2021 ABQB 80, ......
Get Started for Free
5 books & journal articles
-
Opinion Evidence
...28. 251 K, A , supra note 2 at para 73; Bruff‑Murphy , ibid at paras 62-64. 252 Abbey 2009 , supra note 3 at para 77. 253 R v Stephan , 2021 ABCA 82 at paras 120-30; R v SL , 2020 ONSC 4036 at para 79: It was difficult to “ distinguish what evidence applied to which argument, since the defe......
-
Table of Cases
...(CA) .................................... 307 Stephan , R v , 2017 ABCA 380, rev’d 2018 SCC 21, retried 2019 ABQB 715, new trial ordered 2021 ABCA 82 , leave to appeal to the SCC dismissed, [2021] SCCA No 161 (QL) .... 334, 337, 347-48 © [2023] Emond Montgomery Publications. All Rights Rese......
-
Table of cases
...133 R v Stephan, 2018 SCC 21 .......................................................................... 133, 486 R v Stephan, 2021 ABCA 82 ............................................................................... 133 Table of Cases 637 R v Stephens (1991), 27 MVR (2d) 24 (Ont CA) ..........
-
The Prohibited Act, or Actus Reus
...Rather, the ofence as written only requires that the failure to act would endanger life or permanently endanger health. R v Stephan , 2021 ABCA 82 at paras 63–64 and 69. 163 R v Naglik , [1993] 3 SCR 122. 164 Code , above note 3, s 219. 165 Ibid , ss 222(5)(a)–(b). CRIMINAL LAW 134 Those wh......
Get Started for Free