R. v. Storry, 2018 BCCA 483
| Jurisdiction | British Columbia |
| Judge | The Honourable Madam Justice D. Smith,The Honourable Mr. Justice Willcock,The Honourable Madam Justice Fenlon |
| Citation | 2018 BCCA 483 |
| Court | Court of Appeal (British Columbia) |
| Date | 27 December 2018 |
| Docket Number | CA44028 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
2 practice notes
-
R. v. Brown, 2019 BCCA 346
...trial judge’s findings of fact and inferences of fact invite considerable deference. As stated by Madam Justice D. Smith in R. v. Storry, 2018 BCCA 483 at para. 47: [47] The standard of review of a trial judge’s findings and inferences of fact is one of considerable deference. Unless they a......
-
R. v. Scott, 2019 BCSC 313
...guilt is the only reasonable inference to be drawn from the proven facts. [35] As Madam Justice Smith recently observed in R. v. Storry, 2018 BCCA 483 at para. 52, albeit in respect of a different issue, “[c]ross-examination is a valuable and necessary tool to ferret out inconsistencies in ......
2 cases
-
R. v. Brown, 2019 BCCA 346
...trial judge’s findings of fact and inferences of fact invite considerable deference. As stated by Madam Justice D. Smith in R. v. Storry, 2018 BCCA 483 at para. 47: [47] The standard of review of a trial judge’s findings and inferences of fact is one of considerable deference. Unless they a......
-
R. v. Scott, 2019 BCSC 313
...guilt is the only reasonable inference to be drawn from the proven facts. [35] As Madam Justice Smith recently observed in R. v. Storry, 2018 BCCA 483 at para. 52, albeit in respect of a different issue, “[c]ross-examination is a valuable and necessary tool to ferret out inconsistencies in ......