R. v. Sundman, 2022 SCC 31

JurisdictionFederal Jurisdiction (Canada)
JudgeWagner, Richard; Moldaver, Michael J.; Karakatsanis, Andromache; Côté, Suzanne; Brown, Russell; Rowe, Malcolm; Martin, Sheilah; Kasirer, Nicholas; Jamal, Mahmud
Citation2022 SCC 31
CourtSupreme Court (Canada)
Docket Number39569
Date21 July 2022
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
14 practice notes
  • R. v. Downey,
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal of Nova Scotia (Canada)
    • October 6, 2022
    ...No. 258. [4] Section 279(3) has since been repealed: S.C. 2018, c. 29, s. 26. [5] See also the recent discussion in R. v. Sundman, 2022 SCC 31 at para.>[5] See also the recent discussion in R. v. Sundman, 2022 SCC 31 at para. 21. ...
  • R. v. Singh,
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (Ontario)
    • August 15, 2022
    ...2008 SCC 59, [2008] 3 S.C.R. 195; R. v. Magoon, 2018 SCC 14, [2018] 1 S.C.R 309; and the court’s recent decision in R. v. Sundman, 2022 SCC 31.[30] Paré (1987) [118]   The sequence of events in Paré saw the commission of the enumerated offence, a short pause, and ......
  • R v Barre,
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (Saskatchewan)
    • November 24, 2023
    ...(2001), 157 CCC (3d) 129 (Ont CA) [ Kimberley]; R v Magoon, 2018 SCC 14 at paras 17 and 74, [2018] 1 SCR 309 [ Magoon]; and R v Sundman, 2022 SCC 31 at para 29, 416 CCC (3d) 371 [ 34 It is the “distinct criminal acts” aspect of s. 231(5)(e) that Mr. Barre's argument centers on. To help fram......
  • R v Peterson,
    • Canada
    • Court of Queen's Bench of Alberta (Canada)
    • October 31, 2022
    ...“At its core, unlawful confinement involves a deprivation of a person’s liberty:” R v Sundman, 2022 SCC 31, Jamal J at para 21; R v Pritchard, 2008 SCC 59, Binnie J at para 24; R v Parris, 2013 ONCA 515, Watt JA at para 46. To establish that Mr. Peterson committed the o......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
12 cases
  • R. v. Downey,
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal of Nova Scotia (Canada)
    • October 6, 2022
    ...No. 258. [4] Section 279(3) has since been repealed: S.C. 2018, c. 29, s. 26. [5] See also the recent discussion in R. v. Sundman, 2022 SCC 31 at para.>[5] See also the recent discussion in R. v. Sundman, 2022 SCC 31 at para. 21. ...
  • R. v. Singh,
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (Ontario)
    • August 15, 2022
    ...2008 SCC 59, [2008] 3 S.C.R. 195; R. v. Magoon, 2018 SCC 14, [2018] 1 S.C.R 309; and the court’s recent decision in R. v. Sundman, 2022 SCC 31.[30] Paré (1987) [118]   The sequence of events in Paré saw the commission of the enumerated offence, a short pause, and ......
  • R v Peterson,
    • Canada
    • Court of Queen's Bench of Alberta (Canada)
    • October 31, 2022
    ...“At its core, unlawful confinement involves a deprivation of a person’s liberty:” R v Sundman, 2022 SCC 31, Jamal J at para 21; R v Pritchard, 2008 SCC 59, Binnie J at para 24; R v Parris, 2013 ONCA 515, Watt JA at para 46. To establish that Mr. Peterson committed the o......
  • R. v. Jama,
    • Canada
    • Superior Court of Justice of Ontario (Canada)
    • April 19, 2023
    ...requirement is satisfied as long as the murder and the other offence are part of a “single transaction”: R. v. Sundman, 2022 SCC 31, at paras 28-40; R. v. Paré, [1987] 2 S.C.R. 618, at pp. 631-633.  The Crown argues that if the existence of a “single transacti......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT