R. v. Tannhauser, 2020 BCCA 155
| Jurisdiction | British Columbia |
| Judge | The Honourable Chief Justice Bauman,The Honourable Madam Justice Fenlon,The Honourable Mr. Justice Fitch |
| Citation | 2020 BCCA 155 |
| Date | 01 June 2020 |
| Court | Court of Appeal (British Columbia) |
| Docket Number | CA45966 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
6 practice notes
-
R. v. Kang,
...35; Canadian National Railway Co. v. Canada (Attorney General), 2014 SCC 40, para. 47 [Canadian National Railway]; R. v. Tannhauser, 2020 BCCA 155, para. 35. [206] In addition to the printed version of the debates, video footage from the legislative debates was also ......
-
R v. Bakhsheshi,
...that the accompanying act required is that the device be held “in a manner that enables further use”. In R. v. Tannhauser, 2020 BCCA 155, the Court emphasized that the MVA "repeatedly makes clear its desire to limit contact between drivers' hands and their cellphones......
-
R. v. Rajani,
...ordinary sense harmoniously with the scheme of the Act, the object of the Act, and the intention of Parliament”: R. v. Tannhauser, 2020 BCCA 155 at para. 26. [11] Applying these interpretive principles, in my view the word “holdin......
-
West Vancouver (District) v. British Columbia (Attorney General), 2020 BCSC 966
...Act “reinforces the importance of taking a comprehensive approach to interpretation” of legislative provisions (R. v. Tannhauser, 2020 BCCA 155 at para. [62] The following sections will begin with an outline of the legislative history leading to the inclusion of the trust variation provisio......
Request a trial to view additional results
6 cases
-
R. v. Kang,
...35; Canadian National Railway Co. v. Canada (Attorney General), 2014 SCC 40, para. 47 [Canadian National Railway]; R. v. Tannhauser, 2020 BCCA 155, para. 35. [206] In addition to the printed version of the debates, video footage from the legislative debates was also ......
-
R v. Bakhsheshi,
...that the accompanying act required is that the device be held “in a manner that enables further use”. In R. v. Tannhauser, 2020 BCCA 155, the Court emphasized that the MVA "repeatedly makes clear its desire to limit contact between drivers' hands and their cellphones......
-
West Vancouver (District) v. British Columbia (Attorney General), 2020 BCSC 966
...Act “reinforces the importance of taking a comprehensive approach to interpretation” of legislative provisions (R. v. Tannhauser, 2020 BCCA 155 at para. [62] The following sections will begin with an outline of the legislative history leading to the inclusion of the trust variation provisio......
-
R. v. Rajani,
...ordinary sense harmoniously with the scheme of the Act, the object of the Act, and the intention of Parliament”: R. v. Tannhauser, 2020 BCCA 155 at para. 26. [11] Applying these interpretive principles, in my view the word “holdin......
Request a trial to view additional results