R. v. Thompson (A.W.), [2013] O.T.C. Uned. 1527

JurisdictionOntario
JudgeHill, J.
CourtSuperior Court of Justice of Ontario (Canada)
Subject MatterCIVIL RIGHTS,POLICE,CRIMINAL LAW
Citation[2013] O.T.C. Uned. 1527,2013 ONSC 1527,[2013] O.T.C. Uned. 1527 (SC)
Date19 March 2013
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
13 practice notes
  • R. v. Holloway,
    • Canada
    • Superior Court of Justice of Ontario (Canada)
    • September 16, 2021
    ...conduct in violation of the Charter can be admissible on a subsequent trial if circumstances warrant. Justice Hill in R. v. Thompson, 2013 ONSC 1527, 1 C.R. (7th) 125 (Ont.S.C.J.) 204      Cross-examination of a witness about whether or not his or her testimony was ......
  • R. v. Moonie (R.A.), [2013] B.C.T.C. Uned. 1866 (SC)
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada)
    • April 26, 2013
    ...circumstances where the totality of the conduct amounts to a flagrant breach of Mr. Moonie's s. 7 rights. [105] In R. v. Thompson , 2013 ONSC 1527, Hill J. addressed the societal interest factor in the context of firearms-related offences in the following manner: 196 While undoubtedly ......
  • R. v. Reid, 2020 ONCJ 35
    • Canada
    • Ontario Court of Justice General Division (Canada)
    • January 17, 2020
    ...R. v. Coluccio, 2019 ONSC 4559, at para. 87, “there is no special or categorical s. 24(2) rule when it comes to guns.” In R. v. Thompson, 2013 ONSC 1527, at para. 196, Hill J. observed that while “’trends’ may emerge over time respecting the admission of unconstitutionally seized firearms, ......
  • R. v. Wasserman, 2017 MBQB 166
    • Canada
    • Court of Queen's Bench of Manitoba (Canada)
    • September 26, 2017
    ...and not what they could have done. See R. v. Albert, 2014 MBQB 147 (CanLII), R. v. Whitaker, 2008 BCCA 174 (CanLII), and R. v. Thompson, 2013 ONSC 1527 (CanLII). The Crown argues though that if the court were to find a Charter breach, the discoverability of the drugs is a consideration in t......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
13 cases
  • R. v. Holloway,
    • Canada
    • Superior Court of Justice of Ontario (Canada)
    • September 16, 2021
    ...conduct in violation of the Charter can be admissible on a subsequent trial if circumstances warrant. Justice Hill in R. v. Thompson, 2013 ONSC 1527, 1 C.R. (7th) 125 (Ont.S.C.J.) 204      Cross-examination of a witness about whether or not his or her testimony was ......
  • R. v. Moonie (R.A.), [2013] B.C.T.C. Uned. 1866 (SC)
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada)
    • April 26, 2013
    ...circumstances where the totality of the conduct amounts to a flagrant breach of Mr. Moonie's s. 7 rights. [105] In R. v. Thompson , 2013 ONSC 1527, Hill J. addressed the societal interest factor in the context of firearms-related offences in the following manner: 196 While undoubtedly ......
  • R. v. Reid, 2020 ONCJ 35
    • Canada
    • Ontario Court of Justice General Division (Canada)
    • January 17, 2020
    ...R. v. Coluccio, 2019 ONSC 4559, at para. 87, “there is no special or categorical s. 24(2) rule when it comes to guns.” In R. v. Thompson, 2013 ONSC 1527, at para. 196, Hill J. observed that while “’trends’ may emerge over time respecting the admission of unconstitutionally seized firearms, ......
  • R. v. Wasserman, 2017 MBQB 166
    • Canada
    • Court of Queen's Bench of Manitoba (Canada)
    • September 26, 2017
    ...and not what they could have done. See R. v. Albert, 2014 MBQB 147 (CanLII), R. v. Whitaker, 2008 BCCA 174 (CanLII), and R. v. Thompson, 2013 ONSC 1527 (CanLII). The Crown argues though that if the court were to find a Charter breach, the discoverability of the drugs is a consideration in t......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT