R. v. Thompson (A.W.), [2013] O.T.C. Uned. 1527
Jurisdiction | Ontario |
Judge | Hill, J. |
Court | Superior Court of Justice of Ontario (Canada) |
Subject Matter | CIVIL RIGHTS,POLICE,CRIMINAL LAW |
Citation | [2013] O.T.C. Uned. 1527,2013 ONSC 1527,[2013] O.T.C. Uned. 1527 (SC) |
Date | 19 March 2013 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
13 practice notes
-
R. v. Holloway,
...conduct in violation of the Charter can be admissible on a subsequent trial if circumstances warrant. Justice Hill in R. v. Thompson, 2013 ONSC 1527, 1 C.R. (7th) 125 (Ont.S.C.J.) 204 Cross-examination of a witness about whether or not his or her testimony was ......
-
R. v. Moonie (R.A.), [2013] B.C.T.C. Uned. 1866 (SC)
...circumstances where the totality of the conduct amounts to a flagrant breach of Mr. Moonie's s. 7 rights. [105] In R. v. Thompson , 2013 ONSC 1527, Hill J. addressed the societal interest factor in the context of firearms-related offences in the following manner: 196 While undoubtedly ......
-
R. v. Reid, 2020 ONCJ 35
...R. v. Coluccio, 2019 ONSC 4559, at para. 87, “there is no special or categorical s. 24(2) rule when it comes to guns.” In R. v. Thompson, 2013 ONSC 1527, at para. 196, Hill J. observed that while “’trends’ may emerge over time respecting the admission of unconstitutionally seized firearms, ......
-
R. v. Wasserman, 2017 MBQB 166
...and not what they could have done. See R. v. Albert, 2014 MBQB 147 (CanLII), R. v. Whitaker, 2008 BCCA 174 (CanLII), and R. v. Thompson, 2013 ONSC 1527 (CanLII). The Crown argues though that if the court were to find a Charter breach, the discoverability of the drugs is a consideration in t......
Request a trial to view additional results
13 cases
-
R. v. Holloway,
...conduct in violation of the Charter can be admissible on a subsequent trial if circumstances warrant. Justice Hill in R. v. Thompson, 2013 ONSC 1527, 1 C.R. (7th) 125 (Ont.S.C.J.) 204 Cross-examination of a witness about whether or not his or her testimony was ......
-
R. v. Moonie (R.A.), [2013] B.C.T.C. Uned. 1866 (SC)
...circumstances where the totality of the conduct amounts to a flagrant breach of Mr. Moonie's s. 7 rights. [105] In R. v. Thompson , 2013 ONSC 1527, Hill J. addressed the societal interest factor in the context of firearms-related offences in the following manner: 196 While undoubtedly ......
-
R. v. Reid, 2020 ONCJ 35
...R. v. Coluccio, 2019 ONSC 4559, at para. 87, “there is no special or categorical s. 24(2) rule when it comes to guns.” In R. v. Thompson, 2013 ONSC 1527, at para. 196, Hill J. observed that while “’trends’ may emerge over time respecting the admission of unconstitutionally seized firearms, ......
-
R. v. Wasserman, 2017 MBQB 166
...and not what they could have done. See R. v. Albert, 2014 MBQB 147 (CanLII), R. v. Whitaker, 2008 BCCA 174 (CanLII), and R. v. Thompson, 2013 ONSC 1527 (CanLII). The Crown argues though that if the court were to find a Charter breach, the discoverability of the drugs is a consideration in t......
Request a trial to view additional results