R. v. Thrower (M.J.) et al., 2005 BCSC 234
| Judge | Romilly, J. |
| Court | Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada) |
| Case Date | February 17, 2005 |
| Jurisdiction | British Columbia |
| Citations | 2005 BCSC 234;[2005] B.C.T.C. 234 (SC) |
R. v. Thrower (M.J.), [2005] B.C.T.C. 234 (SC)
MLB headnote and full text
Temp. Cite: [2006] B.C.T.C. TBEd. JN.039
Regina v. Mark James Thrower and Michael Andrew Mercredi
(22708-4; 2005 BCSC 234)
Indexed As: R. v. Thrower (M.J.) et al.
British Columbia Supreme Court
Vancouver
Romilly, J.
February 21, 2005.
Summary:
This headnote contains no summary.
Editor's Note: Certain names in the following case have been initialized or the case otherwise edited to prevent the disclosure of identities where required by law, publication ban, Maritime Law Book's editorial policy or otherwise.
Criminal Law - Topic 4482
Procedure - Trial - Joint or separate trials of two or more persons - See paragraphs 1 to 63.
Counsel:
Gregory Weber and Todd Buziak, for the Crown;
Glen Orris, Q.C., for the accused, Mark James Thrower;
Kelly Merrigan, for the accused, Michael Andrew Mercredi.
This application was heard on February 17, 2005, by Romilly, J., of the British Columbia Supreme Court, who delivered the following decision on February 21, 2005.
Please Note: The following judgment has not been edited.
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
R. v. Leggette (B.) et al., (2015) 358 N.S.R.(2d) 294 (SC)
...refd to. [para. 45]. R. v. Jacobson (C.), [2004] O.T.C. 1204 (Sup. Ct.), refd to. [para. 49]. R. v. Thrower (M.J.), [2005] B.C.T.C. 234; 2005 BCSC 234, refd to. [para. R. v. Figliola (M.) et al. (2011), 281 O.A.C. 306; 2011 ONCA 457, dist. [para. 54]. R. v. Guimond, [1979] 1 S.C.R. 960; 26 ......
-
R. v. Pereira (L.S.) et al., 2007 BCSC 1315
...a factor to consider on an application to sever (see R. v. Cross and Lazore (1996), 112 C.C.C. (3d) 410 (Que. C.A.); and R. v. Thrower , 2005 BCSC 234 at para. 34). Violette submits that a separate trial would only take four days because of the following: ∙ He will be bound by any rulings f......
-
R. v. Klippenstein, 2018 MBQB 121
...[10] The test articulated in N. (D.) is referenced without analysis, but with apparent approval in a number of cases. See R. v. Thrower, 2005 BCSC 234, [2005] B.C.J. No. 3007 (QL) at para. 61; R. v. Kalenuik, [2005] O.J. No. 2390 (QL) at para. 17 (Ct. J.); R. v. Powder, 2008 ABQB 579, [2008......
-
R. v. R.K., 2016 BCSC 1348
...that the interests of justice requires severance rests with the applicant, on a balance of probabilities: R. v. Thrower and Mercredi, 2005 BCSC 234 at para. 27. [43] The general rule is that persons engaged in a common enterprise should be jointly tried unless it can be demonstrated that a ......
-
R. v. Leggette (B.) et al., (2015) 358 N.S.R.(2d) 294 (SC)
...refd to. [para. 45]. R. v. Jacobson (C.), [2004] O.T.C. 1204 (Sup. Ct.), refd to. [para. 49]. R. v. Thrower (M.J.), [2005] B.C.T.C. 234; 2005 BCSC 234, refd to. [para. R. v. Figliola (M.) et al. (2011), 281 O.A.C. 306; 2011 ONCA 457, dist. [para. 54]. R. v. Guimond, [1979] 1 S.C.R. 960; 26 ......
-
R. v. Pereira (L.S.) et al., 2007 BCSC 1315
...a factor to consider on an application to sever (see R. v. Cross and Lazore (1996), 112 C.C.C. (3d) 410 (Que. C.A.); and R. v. Thrower , 2005 BCSC 234 at para. 34). Violette submits that a separate trial would only take four days because of the following: ∙ He will be bound by any rulings f......
-
R. v. Klippenstein, 2018 MBQB 121
...[10] The test articulated in N. (D.) is referenced without analysis, but with apparent approval in a number of cases. See R. v. Thrower, 2005 BCSC 234, [2005] B.C.J. No. 3007 (QL) at para. 61; R. v. Kalenuik, [2005] O.J. No. 2390 (QL) at para. 17 (Ct. J.); R. v. Powder, 2008 ABQB 579, [2008......
-
R. v. R.K., 2016 BCSC 1348
...that the interests of justice requires severance rests with the applicant, on a balance of probabilities: R. v. Thrower and Mercredi, 2005 BCSC 234 at para. 27. [43] The general rule is that persons engaged in a common enterprise should be jointly tried unless it can be demonstrated that a ......