R. v. Trang (D.) et al., [2001] A.R. Uned. 459 (QB)
| Judge | Binder, J. |
| Court | Court of Queen's Bench of Alberta (Canada) |
| Case Date | December 28, 2001 |
| Citations | [2001] A.R. Uned. 459 (QB);[2001] A.R. Uned. 459;2001 ABQB 1091 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
2 practice notes
-
R. v. Vallee,
...to human error and vulnerable to attack (Dixon at para. 37). The standard is not one of perfection (O’Connor at para. 194; R. v. Trang, 2001 ABQB 1091, [2001] A.J. No. 1694 at paras. 17‑22). As stated in R. v. Cody, 2017 SCC 31 at para. 58, “[m]istakes happen”. [69] In considering potential......
-
R. v. Loblaws Inc., 2020 ABPC 250
...There is no need to award a stay to ensure absolute, complete and full disclosure. The law does not require perfection: R. v. Trang, 2001 ABQB 1091, at paragraphs 13 and 14. At this stage in the proceedings, a review of the material sought and an order for production, if necessary, will rem......
2 cases
-
R. v. Vallee,
...to human error and vulnerable to attack (Dixon at para. 37). The standard is not one of perfection (O’Connor at para. 194; R. v. Trang, 2001 ABQB 1091, [2001] A.J. No. 1694 at paras. 17‑22). As stated in R. v. Cody, 2017 SCC 31 at para. 58, “[m]istakes happen”. [69] In considering potential......
-
R. v. Loblaws Inc., 2020 ABPC 250
...There is no need to award a stay to ensure absolute, complete and full disclosure. The law does not require perfection: R. v. Trang, 2001 ABQB 1091, at paragraphs 13 and 14. At this stage in the proceedings, a review of the material sought and an order for production, if necessary, will rem......