R. v. TUCKANOW, 2017 SKQB 357
| Jurisdiction | Saskatchewan |
| Judge | KALMAKOFF J. |
| Citation | 2017 SKQB 357 |
| Docket Number | CRM 216 of 2017 |
| Court | Court of Queen's Bench of Saskatchewan (Canada) |
| Date | 07 December 2017 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
2 practice notes
-
R v Wapass,
...that its jurisdiction is concurrent with the jurisdiction of this Court. In support of this assertion, Mr. Wapass relies on R v Tuckanow, 2017 SKQB 357 [Tuckanow]. In Tuckanow, Kalmakoff J. (as he then was) concluded that a superior court and a court of appeal have concurrent jurisdiction t......
-
R. v. A.W.B., 2020 SKQB 30
...There is much to commend in that approach. In Saskatchewan, in R v Tuckanow, 2017 SKQB 357, Kalmakoff J. (as he then was) frames the question when dealing with an adult in paragraphs 12 to [12] The Crown argues that the combined effect of these sections is that where a perso......
2 cases
-
R v Wapass,
...that its jurisdiction is concurrent with the jurisdiction of this Court. In support of this assertion, Mr. Wapass relies on R v Tuckanow, 2017 SKQB 357 [Tuckanow]. In Tuckanow, Kalmakoff J. (as he then was) concluded that a superior court and a court of appeal have concurrent jurisdiction t......
-
R. v. A.W.B., 2020 SKQB 30
...There is much to commend in that approach. In Saskatchewan, in R v Tuckanow, 2017 SKQB 357, Kalmakoff J. (as he then was) frames the question when dealing with an adult in paragraphs 12 to [12] The Crown argues that the combined effect of these sections is that where a perso......