R v Vader, 2016 ABQB 228

JudgeThomas, J.
Subject MatterEVIDENCE,PRACTICE,CROWN,CRIMINAL LAW
Citation2016 ABQB 228
CourtCourt of Queen's Bench of Alberta (Canada)
Docket Number130781800Q1
Date29 April 2016
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
7 practice notes
  • R. v. Giles, 2021 NSSC 69
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court of Nova Scotia (Canada)
    • 25 Febrero 2021
    ...trial judge was correct to hold that the records were in the hands of a third party. [14]      In R. v. Vader, 2016 ABQB 228, the witness had not been admitted to the WPP, but had received emergency protection from the RCMP. The accused, who was charged with first d......
  • R v Gabad,
    • Canada
    • Court of King's Bench of Alberta (Canada)
    • 2 Mayo 2023
    ...of witness protection information should be considered as first party of disclosure or third party disclosure. 34 In R v Vader, 2016 ABQB 228, Justice Thomas considered whether the records sought should be considered as “fruits of the investigation” given that Witness Protecti......
  • R. v. Stipo, 2017 ONSC 5208
    • Canada
    • Superior Court of Justice of Ontario (Canada)
    • 1 Septiembre 2017
    ...package to the Crown without prompting. [Emphasis in original].See also R. v. Scurr, 2008 ABQB 127 at paras 45-57; R. v. Vader, 2016 ABQB 228 at paras. 11-12. It follows that I must respectfully disagree with the applicant OPP that “the relevance of the records was not applicable to the det......
  • R c. Emery Martin, 2021 NBBR 24
    • Canada
    • Court of Queen's Bench of New Brunswick (Canada)
    • 1 Febrero 2021
    ...applicable aux renseignements provenant du PPT a été traitée par les tribunaux en Alberta dans les affaires R v. Vader, 2016 ABQB 228; R v. Jennings, 2018 ABQB 105; et R v. Fischer, 2020 ABQB 67.  Dans l’affaire R v. Le, 2011 MBCA 83, la Cour d’appel du Man......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
7 cases
  • R. v. Giles, 2021 NSSC 69
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court of Nova Scotia (Canada)
    • 25 Febrero 2021
    ...trial judge was correct to hold that the records were in the hands of a third party. [14]      In R. v. Vader, 2016 ABQB 228, the witness had not been admitted to the WPP, but had received emergency protection from the RCMP. The accused, who was charged with first d......
  • R v Gabad,
    • Canada
    • Court of King's Bench of Alberta (Canada)
    • 2 Mayo 2023
    ...of witness protection information should be considered as first party of disclosure or third party disclosure. 34 In R v Vader, 2016 ABQB 228, Justice Thomas considered whether the records sought should be considered as “fruits of the investigation” given that Witness Protecti......
  • R. v. Stipo, 2017 ONSC 5208
    • Canada
    • Superior Court of Justice of Ontario (Canada)
    • 1 Septiembre 2017
    ...package to the Crown without prompting. [Emphasis in original].See also R. v. Scurr, 2008 ABQB 127 at paras 45-57; R. v. Vader, 2016 ABQB 228 at paras. 11-12. It follows that I must respectfully disagree with the applicant OPP that “the relevance of the records was not applicable to the det......
  • R c. Emery Martin, 2021 NBBR 24
    • Canada
    • Court of Queen's Bench of New Brunswick (Canada)
    • 1 Febrero 2021
    ...applicable aux renseignements provenant du PPT a été traitée par les tribunaux en Alberta dans les affaires R v. Vader, 2016 ABQB 228; R v. Jennings, 2018 ABQB 105; et R v. Fischer, 2020 ABQB 67.  Dans l’affaire R v. Le, 2011 MBCA 83, la Cour d’appel du Man......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT