R. v. Van Bibber (G.A.), 2010 YKTC 49
Jurisdiction | Yukon |
Judge | Cozens, J. |
Court | Territorial Court of Yukon (Canada) |
Subject Matter | CRIMINAL LAW |
Citation | 2010 YKTC 49,[2010] Yukon Cases Uned. 49,[2010] Yukon Cases Uned. (TC) 49 |
Date | 11 May 2010 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
9 practice notes
-
Table of cases
...30, 37, 543, 555 R v Valencia, [2008] OJ No 3692 (SCJ) .............................................................. 479 R v Van Bibber, 2010 YKTC 49 ...........................................................................580 R v Vescio (1948), [1949] SCR 139, 92 CCC 161, [1948] SCJ No ......
-
The Prosecutor
...Lawyers as Custodians of the Rule of Law” (2010) 33 Dal LJ 1 at 43–44. 9 See R v Stobbe , 2011 MBQB 280 at para 47; R v Van Bibber , 2010 YKTC 49 at para 76; R v Wilder , 2001 BCSC 1634 at para 8; R v Atomic Energy of Canada Ltd , [2001] OJ No 1580 at para 18 (SCJ) [ Atomic Energy ]; R v Bl......
-
THE GLADUE ANALYSIS: SHEDDING LIGHT ON APPROPRIATE SENTENCING PROCEDURES AND SANCTIONS.
...circle was denied, see e.g. R v Munson, 2001 SKQB 530; R v Louie, 2013 SKQB 307. (202) See e.g. R vMcNabb, 2014 MBPC 10; R v Van Bibber, 2010 YKTC 49 [Van Bibber]; R v JJ, 2004 NLCA 81; R v Lavergne, 2018 ONCJ 901; R v EO, 2019 YKCA (203) Tom, supra note 41 at para 14. (204) Ibid at para 39......
-
R. v. Mitchell, 2020 YKCA 2
...the significance of the prior conviction for impaired driving causing death. [29] The judge referred to the decision in R. v. Van Bibber, 2010 YKTC 49, to outline the sentencing range for repeat drunk driving offenders in the jurisdiction. He noted that the factors usually taken into accoun......
Request a trial to view additional results
6 cases
-
R. v. Mitchell, 2020 YKCA 2
...the significance of the prior conviction for impaired driving causing death. [29] The judge referred to the decision in R. v. Van Bibber, 2010 YKTC 49, to outline the sentencing range for repeat drunk driving offenders in the jurisdiction. He noted that the factors usually taken into accoun......
-
R. v. Tibbo, 2020 YKTC 18
...Impaired driving is an inherently dangerous activity and places the lives of other citizens at risk. As stated in R. v. Van Bibber, 2010 YKTC 49, at para. …Impaired driving offences are also unique in the circumstances of the individuals who commit the crime of impaired driving......
-
R. v. Allen (S.K.), 2012 YKTC 36
...driving prohibition. [5] Crown counsel relies on the range of sentencing that was discussed and set forth in the R. v. Van Bibber case, 2010 YKTC 49, in paras. 52 to 67. The Crown notes the mitigating factors of the guilty pleas, and the efforts of Mr. Allen, since the commission of the off......
-
R. v. Tom (D.A.), [2012] Yukon Cases Uned. 55
...him the opportunity to make amends with his community by accepting responsibility for what he did." The Circle [39] In R. v. Van Bibber 2010 YKTC 49 I wrote in some detail about circle sentencing purposes and process (see paras. 31, 32, 78, 79). I will not repeat these comments here other t......
Request a trial to view additional results
3 books & journal articles
-
Table of cases
...30, 37, 543, 555 R v Valencia, [2008] OJ No 3692 (SCJ) .............................................................. 479 R v Van Bibber, 2010 YKTC 49 ...........................................................................580 R v Vescio (1948), [1949] SCR 139, 92 CCC 161, [1948] SCJ No ......
-
The Prosecutor
...Lawyers as Custodians of the Rule of Law” (2010) 33 Dal LJ 1 at 43–44. 9 See R v Stobbe , 2011 MBQB 280 at para 47; R v Van Bibber , 2010 YKTC 49 at para 76; R v Wilder , 2001 BCSC 1634 at para 8; R v Atomic Energy of Canada Ltd , [2001] OJ No 1580 at para 18 (SCJ) [ Atomic Energy ]; R v Bl......
-
THE GLADUE ANALYSIS: SHEDDING LIGHT ON APPROPRIATE SENTENCING PROCEDURES AND SANCTIONS.
...circle was denied, see e.g. R v Munson, 2001 SKQB 530; R v Louie, 2013 SKQB 307. (202) See e.g. R vMcNabb, 2014 MBPC 10; R v Van Bibber, 2010 YKTC 49 [Van Bibber]; R v JJ, 2004 NLCA 81; R v Lavergne, 2018 ONCJ 901; R v EO, 2019 YKCA (203) Tom, supra note 41 at para 14. (204) Ibid at para 39......