R v Veen, 2020 ABQB 99
| Judge | Honourable Mr. Justice W.P. Sullivan |
| Citation | 2020 ABQB 99 |
| Docket Number | 180568115S1 |
| Court | Court of Queen's Bench of Alberta (Canada) |
| Date | 07 February 2020 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
4 practice notes
-
R v Veen,
...Memorandum of Judgment Appeal from the Decision of The Honourable Justice W.P. Sullivan Dated the 7th day of February, 2020 (2020 ABQB 99, Docket: Memorandum of Judgment _______________________________________________________ The Court: [1] ......
-
R v Veen, 2020 ABCA 240
...[1] This is an application for permission to appeal the decision of a summary conviction appeal judge in R v Veen, 2020 ABQB 99, upholding R v Veen, 2019 ABPC 55. The central issues on appeal were the lawfulness of Mr. Veen’s arrest and subsequent detention and the remedies that should flow......
-
R. v. Lafreniere,
...of the interplay of the subsections of s. 495, I prefer the extensive reasoning of Justice Sullivan in the recent decision of R. v. Veen, 2020 ABQB 99. In that decision, the Court interpreted subsections 495(2) and (3) by assessing the words in their entire context in light of the Sup......
-
R v Veen, 2020 ABCA 103
...[2] On February 7, 2020, written reasons in R v Veen, 2020 ABQB 99, were [3] On February 28, 2020, a Notice of Application ......
4 cases
-
R v Veen,
...Memorandum of Judgment Appeal from the Decision of The Honourable Justice W.P. Sullivan Dated the 7th day of February, 2020 (2020 ABQB 99, Docket: Memorandum of Judgment _______________________________________________________ The Court: [1] ......
-
R v Veen, 2020 ABCA 240
...[1] This is an application for permission to appeal the decision of a summary conviction appeal judge in R v Veen, 2020 ABQB 99, upholding R v Veen, 2019 ABPC 55. The central issues on appeal were the lawfulness of Mr. Veen’s arrest and subsequent detention and the remedies that should flow......
-
R. v. Lafreniere,
...of the interplay of the subsections of s. 495, I prefer the extensive reasoning of Justice Sullivan in the recent decision of R. v. Veen, 2020 ABQB 99. In that decision, the Court interpreted subsections 495(2) and (3) by assessing the words in their entire context in light of the Sup......
-
R v Veen, 2020 ABCA 103
...[2] On February 7, 2020, written reasons in R v Veen, 2020 ABQB 99, were [3] On February 28, 2020, a Notice of Application ......