R. v. Violette (J.J.) et al., 2008 BCSC 665
Jurisdiction | British Columbia |
Judge | Romilly, J. |
Court | Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada) |
Subject Matter | CRIMINAL LAW |
Citation | 2008 BCSC 665,[2008] B.C.T.C. Uned. H18 |
Date | 28 May 2008 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
2 practice notes
-
R. v. Legebokoff (C.A.), 2014 BCSC 705
...by one tribunal and not by two tribunals. Where Accused May Wish to Testify on One Count and Not on Others [42] In R. v. Violette, 2008 BCSC 665, Romilly J., in a case involving a multiple accused indictment which included 28 counts against four accused, considered a series of severance app......
-
R. v. Zakuti,
...J. reviewed the law pertaining to an accused’s intention to testify and adopted the court’s summary in R. v. Violette, 2008 BCSC 665 at para. [49] Romilly J., at para. 49 in Violette, summarized the principles he derived from the......
2 cases
-
R. v. Legebokoff (C.A.), 2014 BCSC 705
...by one tribunal and not by two tribunals. Where Accused May Wish to Testify on One Count and Not on Others [42] In R. v. Violette, 2008 BCSC 665, Romilly J., in a case involving a multiple accused indictment which included 28 counts against four accused, considered a series of severance app......
-
R. v. Zakuti,
...J. reviewed the law pertaining to an accused’s intention to testify and adopted the court’s summary in R. v. Violette, 2008 BCSC 665 at para. [49] Romilly J., at para. 49 in Violette, summarized the principles he derived from the......