R. v. Violette (J.J.) et al., [2008] B.C.T.C. Uned. H21
| Jurisdiction | British Columbia |
| Judge | Romilly, J. |
| Court | Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada) |
| Subject Matter | EVIDENCE,CIVIL RIGHTS,PRACTICE,CRIMINAL LAW |
| Citation | [2008] B.C.T.C. Uned. H21,2008 BCSC 1142 |
| Date | 22 August 2008 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
3 practice notes
-
R. v. Nicholson, 2016 BCSC 1831
...R. v. Batte… [27] Likely relevance must be assessed in the context of the case. It cannot be determined in a vacuum: R. v. Violette, 2008 BCSC 1142, at para. 35; R. v. Bartkowski, 2004 BCSC 480, at para.11. As stated by Hill J. in R. v. D.M., 37 C.R. (5th) 80, 2000 CarswellOnt 2923 (Ont. S.......
-
Trans Mountain Pipeline ULC v. Mivasair,
...of the subpoena must satisfy the court that the witness is “likely to give material evidence”. See also R. v. Violette, 2008 BCSC 1142 at paras. 59 and [75] In Yehia at para. 13, Justice Pitfield articulated the same test under R.&......
-
R. v. Sipes (D.G.) et al., [2010] B.C.T.C. Uned. 1625 (SC)
...dealing with a Crown application to dismiss an O'Connor application prior to service, although it did provide R. v. Violette , 2008 BCSC 1142. [20] Violette dealt with an application by Crown counsel to quash subpoenas that had been served on a Crown witness and the Canada Revenue Agency se......
3 cases
-
R. v. Nicholson, 2016 BCSC 1831
...R. v. Batte… [27] Likely relevance must be assessed in the context of the case. It cannot be determined in a vacuum: R. v. Violette, 2008 BCSC 1142, at para. 35; R. v. Bartkowski, 2004 BCSC 480, at para.11. As stated by Hill J. in R. v. D.M., 37 C.R. (5th) 80, 2000 CarswellOnt 2923 (Ont. S.......
-
Trans Mountain Pipeline ULC v. Mivasair,
...of the subpoena must satisfy the court that the witness is “likely to give material evidence”. See also R. v. Violette, 2008 BCSC 1142 at paras. 59 and [75] In Yehia at para. 13, Justice Pitfield articulated the same test under R.&......
-
R. v. Sipes (D.G.) et al., [2010] B.C.T.C. Uned. 1625 (SC)
...dealing with a Crown application to dismiss an O'Connor application prior to service, although it did provide R. v. Violette , 2008 BCSC 1142. [20] Violette dealt with an application by Crown counsel to quash subpoenas that had been served on a Crown witness and the Canada Revenue Agency se......