R. v. Warring (G.S.), 2016 ABQB 236
| Judge | Gates, J. |
| Court | Court of Queen's Bench of Alberta (Canada) |
| Subject Matter | CIVIL RIGHTS,CRIMINAL LAW |
| Citation | 2016 ABQB 236 |
| Date | 25 April 2016 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
3 practice notes
-
R. v. Howe (D.J.) et al., (2016) 375 N.S.R.(2d) 233 (SC)
...counsel to hold themselves in a state of perpetual availability. [my emphasis] [32] As elaborated by Justice Gates in R. v. Warring , 2016 ABQB 236: 50 The requirement that defence counsel produce evidence of acquiescence was discussed by Fraser CJA in R. v. Koruz, 1992 ABCA 144, affirmed [......
-
R v Ryland, 2017 ABQB 799
...Crown’s argument that non-compliance with the Rule ought to exclude the Court’s consideration of the application entirely: R v Warring, 2016 ABQB 236 (CanLII), [2016] AJ No 422 at para 90, or that the Applicant has waived his rights by breach of the time requirement: R v Brouillette, 2016 A......
-
R. v. Regan (L.M.), 2016 ABQB 561
...Crown's argument that non-compliance with the Rule ought to exclude the Court's consideration of the application entirely: R v Warring, 2016 ABQB 236, [2016] AJ No 422 at para 90, or that the Applicant has waived his rights by breach of the time requirement: R v Brouillette , 2016 ABQB 214,......
3 cases
-
R. v. Howe (D.J.) et al., (2016) 375 N.S.R.(2d) 233 (SC)
...counsel to hold themselves in a state of perpetual availability. [my emphasis] [32] As elaborated by Justice Gates in R. v. Warring , 2016 ABQB 236: 50 The requirement that defence counsel produce evidence of acquiescence was discussed by Fraser CJA in R. v. Koruz, 1992 ABCA 144, affirmed [......
-
R v Ryland, 2017 ABQB 799
...Crown’s argument that non-compliance with the Rule ought to exclude the Court’s consideration of the application entirely: R v Warring, 2016 ABQB 236 (CanLII), [2016] AJ No 422 at para 90, or that the Applicant has waived his rights by breach of the time requirement: R v Brouillette, 2016 A......
-
R. v. Regan (L.M.), 2016 ABQB 561
...Crown's argument that non-compliance with the Rule ought to exclude the Court's consideration of the application entirely: R v Warring, 2016 ABQB 236, [2016] AJ No 422 at para 90, or that the Applicant has waived his rights by breach of the time requirement: R v Brouillette , 2016 ABQB 214,......