R. v. White, 2020 NSCA 33

JurisdictionNova Scotia
JudgeSaunders
Citation2020 NSCA 33
Date25 March 2020
CourtCourt of Appeal of Nova Scotia (Canada)
Docket NumberCAC 484357
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
20 practice notes
  • R. v. Parranto,
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court (Canada)
    • November 12, 2021
    ...(1981), 64 C.C.C. (2d) 325; R. v. Leach, 2019 BCCA 451; R. v. Sinclair, 2016 ONCA 683; R. v. Solano‑Santana, 2018 ONSC 3345; R. v. White, 2020 NSCA 33, 387 C.C.C. (3d) 106; R. v. Borris, 2017 NBQB 253; R. v. Sidhu, C.J. Ontario, No. 17‑821, June 16, 2017, aff’d 2019 ONCA 880; R. v. Petrowsk......
  • R. v. Butcher, 2020 NSCA 50
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal of Nova Scotia (Canada)
    • June 25, 2020
    ...s. 718.2(a) and (b) of the Criminal Code. [Emphasis added] [249] This case is not a situation like R. v. Hawkins or R. v. White, 2020 NSCA 33, where the trial judges failed to carry out a parity analysis. Here, the trial judge referred to a number of cases to guide him on parity. However, w......
  • R. v. Laing,
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal of Nova Scotia (Canada)
    • March 24, 2022
    ...Parranto, 2021 SCC 46, paras. 13-15; R. v. Espinosa Ribadeneira, 2019 NSCA 7, para. 34; R. v. Newman, 2020 NSCA 24, para. 31; R. v. White, 2020 NSCA 33, paras. 20-24; R. v. Alcorn, 2021 NSCA 75, paras. 25-27; R. v. Probert, 2021 NSCA 82, para. 10. [24]      These st......
  • R. v. Hynes,
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal of Nova Scotia (Canada)
    • July 8, 2022
    ...factors.  A failure to carry out a parity analysis can amount to legal error (see: R. v. Hawkins, 2011 NSCA 7; R. v. White, 2020 NSCA 33).  [145]    The proper application of the parity principle can present a daunting task for busy trial courts.  Here, the tri......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
20 cases
  • R. v. Parranto,
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court (Canada)
    • November 12, 2021
    ...(1981), 64 C.C.C. (2d) 325; R. v. Leach, 2019 BCCA 451; R. v. Sinclair, 2016 ONCA 683; R. v. Solano‑Santana, 2018 ONSC 3345; R. v. White, 2020 NSCA 33, 387 C.C.C. (3d) 106; R. v. Borris, 2017 NBQB 253; R. v. Sidhu, C.J. Ontario, No. 17‑821, June 16, 2017, aff’d 2019 ONCA 880; R. v. Petrowsk......
  • R. v. Butcher, 2020 NSCA 50
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal of Nova Scotia (Canada)
    • June 25, 2020
    ...s. 718.2(a) and (b) of the Criminal Code. [Emphasis added] [249] This case is not a situation like R. v. Hawkins or R. v. White, 2020 NSCA 33, where the trial judges failed to carry out a parity analysis. Here, the trial judge referred to a number of cases to guide him on parity. However, w......
  • R. v. Laing,
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal of Nova Scotia (Canada)
    • March 24, 2022
    ...Parranto, 2021 SCC 46, paras. 13-15; R. v. Espinosa Ribadeneira, 2019 NSCA 7, para. 34; R. v. Newman, 2020 NSCA 24, para. 31; R. v. White, 2020 NSCA 33, paras. 20-24; R. v. Alcorn, 2021 NSCA 75, paras. 25-27; R. v. Probert, 2021 NSCA 82, para. 10. [24]      These st......
  • R. v. Hynes,
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal of Nova Scotia (Canada)
    • July 8, 2022
    ...factors.  A failure to carry out a parity analysis can amount to legal error (see: R. v. Hawkins, 2011 NSCA 7; R. v. White, 2020 NSCA 33).  [145]    The proper application of the parity principle can present a daunting task for busy trial courts.  Here, the tri......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT