R. v. Wilder (D.M.), 2001 BCSC 1634

JudgeRomilly, J.
CourtSupreme Court of British Columbia (Canada)
Case DateNovember 27, 2001
JurisdictionBritish Columbia
Citations2001 BCSC 1634;[2001] B.C.T.C. 1634 (SC)

R. v. Wilder (D.M.), [2001] B.C.T.C. 1634 (SC)

MLB headnote and full text

Temp. Cite: [2002] B.C.T.C. TBEd. SE.025

Her Majesty the Queen v. Dara M. Wilder

(CC901654; 2001 BCSC 1634)

Indexed As: R. v. Wilder (D.M.)

British Columbia Supreme Court

Vancouver

Romilly, J.

November 27, 2001.

Summary:

This headnote contains no summary.

Criminal Law - Topic 22

General principles - Prosecution of crime - Function of the Crown prosecutor, Director of Public Prosecutions and Attorney General - See paragraphs 1 to 26.

Criminal Law - Topic 26

General principles - Prosecution of crime - Prosecutorial discretion - See paragraphs 1 to 26.

Cases Noticed:

R. v. Wilder (D.M.) (2000), 132 B.C.A.C. 122; 215 W.A.C. 122; 142 C.C.C.(3d) 418 (C.A.), refd to. [para. 4].

R. v. White (J.K.), [1999] 2 S.C.R. 417; 240 N.R. 1; 123 B.C.A.C. 161; 201 W.A.C. 161; 135 C.C.C.(3d) 257, affing. (1998), 102 B.C.A.C. 28; 166 W.A.C. 28; 122 C.C.C.(3d) 167 (C.A.), refd to. [para. 5].

R. v. Charest (1990), 28 Q.A.C. 258; 57 C.C.C.(3d) 312 (C.A.), refd to. [para. 10].

R. v. Grover (1990), 38 O.A.C. 219; 56 C.C.C.(3d) 532 (C.A.), revd. [1991] 3 S.C.R. 387; 131 N.R. 80; 50 O.A.C. 185; 67 C.C.C.(3d) 576, refd to. [para. 10].

Boucher v. R. (1954), 110 C.C.C. 263 (S.C.C.), refd to. [para. 11].

R. v. Beare; R. v. Higgins, [1988] 2 S.C.R. 387; 88 N.R. 205; 71 Sask.R. 1; 45 C.C.C.(3d) 57; [1989] 1 W.W.R. 97; 66 C.R.(3d) 97; 55 D.L.R.(4th) 481, refd to. [para. 13].

R. v. V.T., [1992] 1 S.C.R. 749; 134 N.R. 289; 7 B.C.A.C. 81; 15 W.A.C. 81; [1992] W.W.R. 193; 71 C.C.C.(3d) 32, refd to. [para. 14].

R. v. Franks (1991), 4 B.C.A.C. 72; 9 W.A.C. 72; 67 C.C.C.(3d) 280 (C.A.), refd to. [para. 16].

R. v. Petropoulos (W.) (1995), 54 B.C.A.C. 119; 88 W.A.C. 119 (C.A.), refd to. [para. 18].

Saikaly v. R. (1979), 48 C.C.C.(2d) 192 (Ont. C.A.), refd to. [para. 19].

R. v. Arviv (1985), 8 O.A.C. 92; 19 C.C.C.(3d) 395; 20 D.L.R.(4th) 422; 45 C.R.(3d) 354 (C.A.), refd to. [para. 19].

R. v. Ertel (1987), 20 O.A.C. 257; 35 C.C.C.(3d) 398; 58 C.R.(3d) 252; 30 C.R.R. 209 (C.A.), refd to. [para. 19].

R. v. Light (1993), 78 C.C.C.(3d) 221 (B.C.C.A.), refd to. [para. 21].

R. v. Smythe, [1971] 1 S.C.R. 680; 3 C.C.C.(2d) 366, refd to. [para. 21].

R. v. Verrette, [1978] 2 S.C.R. 838; 21 N.R. 571; 40 C.C.C.(2d) 273, refd to. [para. 21].

Balderstone v. R. et al. (1983), 23 Man.R.(2d) 125; 8 C.C.C.(3d) 532 (C.A.), refd to. [para. 21].

R. v. Power (E.), [1994] 1 S.C.R. 601; 165 N.R. 241; 117 Nfld. & P.E.I.R. 269; 365 A.P.R. 269; 89 C.C.C.(3d) 1; 29 C.R.(4th) 1, refd to. [para. 22].

United States of America v. Leon, [1996] 1 S.C.R. 888; 195 N.R. 228; 90 O.A.C. 217, refd to. [para. 22].

R. v. Durette et al. (1992), 54 O.A.C. 81; 72 C.C.C.(3d) 421 (C.A.), refd to. [para. 24].

Kostuch v. Alberta (Attorney General) (1995), 174 A.R. 109; 102 W.A.C. 109; 43 C.R.(4th) 811 (C.A.), refd to. [para. 25].

Patrick et al. v. Canada (Attorney General) (1986), 28 C.C.C.(3d) 417 (B.C.S.C.), refd to. [para. 26].

Werring v. British Columbia (Attorney General) et al. (1997), 101 B.C.A.C. 199; 164 W.A.C. 199; 122 C.C.C.(3d) 343 (C.A.), refd to. [para. 26].

Counsel:

Lindsay Smith and Veda Kenya, for the Crown;

The accused, Dara M. Wilder in person.

This application was heard on October 22-26, 30 and 31 and November 1, 5, 6, 13, 14, 19 and 20, 2001, before Romilly, J., of the British Columbia Supreme Court, who delivered the following decision on November 27, 2001.

Please note: The following judgment has not been edited.

To continue reading

Request your trial
4 practice notes
  • Table of cases
    • Canada
    • Irwin Books Ethics and Criminal Law. Second Edition
    • June 19, 2015
    ...430 R v Wijesinha, [1995] 3 SCR 422, 100 CCC (3d) 410, 1995 CanLII 67 .............499 R v Wilder, 2001 BCSC 1634 ..............................................................................580 R v Williams (1897), 28 OR 583, 3 CCC 9, [1897] OJ No 153 (Div Ct) ............546 R v Williams......
  • The Prosecutor
    • Canada
    • Irwin Books Ethics and Criminal Law. Second Edition
    • June 19, 2015
    ...of Law” (2010) 33 Dal LJ 1 at 43–44. 9 See R v Stobbe , 2011 MBQB 280 at para 47; R v Van Bibber , 2010 YKTC 49 at para 76; R v Wilder , 2001 BCSC 1634 at para 8; R v Atomic Energy of Canada Ltd , [2001] OJ No 1580 at para 18 (SCJ) [ Atomic Energy ]; R v Blencowe (1997), 118 CCC (3d) 529 at......
  • R. c. Oland,
    • Canada
    • Court of Queen's Bench of New Brunswick (Canada)
    • September 11, 2018
    ...preuve pertinent dans une demande relative à un abus de procédure (R. c. Kocet, 2015 ONCJ 804, au par. 34; R. c. Wilder, 2001 BCSC 1634, au par. 8; et, dans le contexte d’une action au civil, Roy c. British Columbia (Attorney General), 2005 BCCA 88, au [41] &......
  • R v Oland, 2018 NBQB 253
    • Canada
    • New Brunswick Court of Queen's Bench of New Brunswick (Canada)
    • September 11, 2018
    ...of process but may be some evidence relevant to an abuse of process application (R. v. Kocet, 2015 ONCJ 804 at para. 34; R. v. Wilder, 2001 BCSC 1634 at para. 8; and in the civil context Roy v. British Columbia (Attorney General), 2005 BCCA 88 at para. [41] The significance of the failure o......
2 cases
  • R. c. Oland,
    • Canada
    • Court of Queen's Bench of New Brunswick (Canada)
    • September 11, 2018
    ...preuve pertinent dans une demande relative à un abus de procédure (R. c. Kocet, 2015 ONCJ 804, au par. 34; R. c. Wilder, 2001 BCSC 1634, au par. 8; et, dans le contexte d’une action au civil, Roy c. British Columbia (Attorney General), 2005 BCCA 88, au [41] &......
  • R v Oland, 2018 NBQB 253
    • Canada
    • New Brunswick Court of Queen's Bench of New Brunswick (Canada)
    • September 11, 2018
    ...of process but may be some evidence relevant to an abuse of process application (R. v. Kocet, 2015 ONCJ 804 at para. 34; R. v. Wilder, 2001 BCSC 1634 at para. 8; and in the civil context Roy v. British Columbia (Attorney General), 2005 BCCA 88 at para. [41] The significance of the failure o......
2 books & journal articles
  • The Prosecutor
    • Canada
    • Irwin Books Ethics and Criminal Law. Second Edition
    • June 19, 2015
    ...of Law” (2010) 33 Dal LJ 1 at 43–44. 9 See R v Stobbe , 2011 MBQB 280 at para 47; R v Van Bibber , 2010 YKTC 49 at para 76; R v Wilder , 2001 BCSC 1634 at para 8; R v Atomic Energy of Canada Ltd , [2001] OJ No 1580 at para 18 (SCJ) [ Atomic Energy ]; R v Blencowe (1997), 118 CCC (3d) 529 at......
  • Table of cases
    • Canada
    • Irwin Books Ethics and Criminal Law. Second Edition
    • June 19, 2015
    ...430 R v Wijesinha, [1995] 3 SCR 422, 100 CCC (3d) 410, 1995 CanLII 67 .............499 R v Wilder, 2001 BCSC 1634 ..............................................................................580 R v Williams (1897), 28 OR 583, 3 CCC 9, [1897] OJ No 153 (Div Ct) ............546 R v Williams......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT