R. v. Wilder (D.M.)

JurisdictionBritish Columbia
CourtSupreme Court of British Columbia (Canada)
JudgeRomilly, J.
Citation2004 BCSC 644,[2004] B.C.T.C. 644 (SC)
Date14 May 2004

R. v. Wilder (D.M.), [2004] B.C.T.C. 644 (SC)

MLB headnote and full text

Temp. Cite: [2004] B.C.T.C. TBEd. JN.020

Her Majesty The Queen v. Roger E. Lawrence, Michael L. Vaz, Michael B. Richards, Victor J. Attrill, Ronald L. Johnson, Dara M. Wilder, Gerald M. Byerlay, Seona J. Wilder and Mid-Pacific Services Inc.

(CC901654; 2004 BCSC 644)

Indexed As: R. v. Wilder (D.M.)

British Columbia Supreme Court

Vancouver

Romilly, J.

May 14, 2004.

Summary:

This headnote contains no summary.

Criminal Law - Topic 5792

Punishments (sentence) - Restitution - When appropriate - See paragraphs 60 to 68.

Criminal Law - Topic 5806

Sentencing - General - Co-accused - Sentence parity - See paragraphs 18 and 58.

Criminal Law - Topic 5859

Sentencing - Sentence - Particular offences - Fraud - See paragraphs 1 to 78.

Criminal Law - Topic 5972

Sentencing - Sentence - Particular offences - Money laundering or proceeds of crime - See paragraphs 1 to 78.

Cases Noticed:

R. v. White (J.K.) (1998), 102 B.C.A.C. 28; 166 W.A.C. 28; 122 C.C.C.(3d) 167 (C.A.), refd to. [para. 11].

Andrews v. Law Society of British Columbia, [1989] 1 S.C.R. 143; 91 N.R. 255; 56 D.L.R.(4th) 1, refd to. [para. 18].

R. v. Wilson (H.M.), [2003] B.C.T.C. 414; 2003 BCSC 414, refd to. [para. 19].

R. v. Lawrence (R.E.) (1996), 82 B.C.A.C. 255; 133 W.A.C. 255 (C.A.), refd to. [para. 23].

R. v. Anderson (R.J.) (1992), 16 B.C.A.C. 14; 28 W.A.C. 14; 74 C.C.C.(3d) 523 (C.A.), refd to. [para. 47].

R. v. Cormier (D.) (1999), 209 N.B.R.(2d) 289; 535 A.P.R. 289; 140 C.C.C.(3d) 87 (C.A.), refd to. [para. 47].

R. v. E.S. (1997), 191 N.B.R.(2d) 3; 488 A.P.R. 3 (C.A.), refd to. [para. 47].

R. v. LaBrie (1988), 87 N.S.R.(2d) 181; 222 A.P.R. 181 (C.A.), refd to. [para. 47].

R. v. Ambrose (B.A.) (2000), 271 A.R. 164; 234 W.A.C. 164; 85 Alta. L.R.(3d) 82 (C.A.), refd to. [para. 47].

R. v. Sawchyn (1981), 30 A.R. 314; 60 C.C.C.(2d) 200 (C.A.), refd to. [para. 47].

R. v. Valentini (D.) et al. (1999), 118 O.A.C. 1; 132 C.C.C.(3d) 262 (C.A.), refd to. [para. 47].

R. v. Vu (S.V.) (2003), 183 B.C.A.C. 227; 301 W.A.C. 227; 2003 BCCA 339, refd to. [para. 47].

R. v. Bludoff (1960), 129 C.C.C. 264 (B.C.C.A.), refd to. [para. 49].

R. v. Isaza (G.) (1993), 35 B.C.A.C. 217; 57 W.A.C. 217; 86 C.C.C.(3d) 19 (C.A.), refd to. [para. 49].

R. v. Beaupré (1994), 25 W.C.B.(2d) 36 (Que. C.A.), refd to. [para. 49].

R. v. Robson (W.), [1988] O.A.C. Uned. 257; 125 C.C.C.(3d) 93 (C.A.), refd to. [para. 49].

R. v. McPhee (1981), 14 Man.R.(2d) 199; 23 C.R.(3d) 78 (C.A.), refd to. [para. 50].

R. v. McLeod (R.G.) (1992), 109 Sask.R. 8; 42 W.A.C. 8; 81 C.C.C.(3d) 83 (C.A.), refd to. [para. 51].

R. v. C.A.M., [1996] 1 S.C.R. 500; 194 N.R. 321; 73 B.C.A.C. 81; 120 W.A.C. 81; 105 C.C.C.(3d) 327; 46 C.R.(4th) 269, refd to. [para. 52].

R. v. Dawdy (1973), 12 C.C.C.(2d) 477 (Ont. C.A.), refd to. [para. 53].

R. v. Genaille (G.T.) (1997), 118 Man.R.(2d) 114; 149 W.A.C. 114; 116 C.C.C.(3d) 459 (C.A.), refd to. [para. 53].

R. v. Johnston, [1990] B.C.J. No. 693 (C.A.), refd to. [para. 54].

R. v. Chisholm (1985), 67 N.S.R.(2d) 66; 155 A.P.R. 66; 18 C.C.C.(3d) 518 (C.A.), refd to. [para. 54].

R. v. Fait (1982), 37 A.R. 273; 68 C.C.C.(2d) 367 (C.A.), refd to. [para. 54].

R. v. Taylor, [1988] B.C.J. No. 2699 (C.A.), refd to. [para. 56].

R. v. Roberts (S.A.), [1989] B.C.J. No. 1251 (C.A.), refd to. [para. 56].

R. v. Devgan (R.) (1999), 121 O.A.C. 265; 136 C.C.C.(3d) 238 (C.A.), refd to. [para. 61].

R. v. Biegus (J.S.) (1999), 127 O.A.C. 239; 141 C.C.C.(3d) 245 (C.A.), refd to. [para. 61].

R. v. Taylor (2003), 180 C.C.C.(3d) 495 (C.A.), refd to. [para. 61].

R. v. Semeniuk (M.K.) (2004), 195 B.C.A.C. 307; 319 W.A.C. 307; 2004 BCCA 233, refd to. [para. 61].

R. v. Mohamad (H.) (2004), 181 O.A.C. 201 (C.A.), refd to. [para. 61].

R. v. Savard (1996), 109 C.C.C.(3d) 471 (Que. C.A.), refd to. [para. 69].

R. v. Wilson (P.) (2003), 170 O.A.C. 128; 174 C.C.C.(3d) 255 (C.A.), refd to. [para. 69].

R. v. Bjellebo (E.S.) et al. (2003), 177 O.A.C. 378 (C.A.), refd to. [para. 70].

R. v. Chusid (S.), [2001] O.T.C. 866; 57 O.R.(3d) 20 (Sup. Ct.), refd to. [para. 71].

R. v. Kuriya (B.) (2002), 252 N.B.R.(2d) 247; 658 A.P.R. 247 (T.D.), refd to. [para. 72].

Counsel:

Lyndsay Smith and Veda Kenda, for the Crown;

The accused appeared in person.

This sentencing was heard in Vancouver, British Columbia, on May 10, 12 and 14, 2004, before Romilly, J., of the British Columbia Supreme Court, who delivered the following judgment on May 14, 2004.

Please note: The following judgment has not been edited.

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex
9 practice notes
  • R. v. Eizenga
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (Ontario)
    • September 24, 2010
    ...105]. R. v. Fitzgibbon, [1990] 1 S.C.R. 1005; 107 N.R. 281; 40 O.A.C. 81, refd to. [para. 106]. R. v. Wilder (D.M.), [2004] B.C.T.C. 644; 2004 BCSC 644, affd. (2008), 259 B.C.A.C. 236; 436 W.A.C. 236; 2008 BCCA 370, refd to. [para. R. v. Lawrence (R.E.) et al. - see R. v. Wilder (D.M.). Sta......
  • Restitution
    • Canada
    • Criminal Law Series Prosecuting and Defending Fraud Cases, 2nd Edition
    • May 3, 2021
    ...sentence amounts to excessive punishment. See R. v. Siemens (1999), 136 C.C.C. (3d) 353 (Man. C.A.). … [110] As in Wilder [ R v Wilder , 2004 BCSC 644 , aff’d 2008 BCCA 370 ], Eizenga alleges that he cannot afford to pay as he has disposed of all the money. At the same time, the ultimate di......
  • Anatomy Of A Tax Prosecution: A Practical Guide
    • Canada
    • Irwin Books Archive Advocacy and Taxation in Canada Part One Trial Advocacy
    • August 27, 2004
    ...B.C.J. No. 355 (S.C.), 7 year sentences were imposed for a $17 million Scientific Research Tax Credit (“SRTC”) fraud; in R. v. Wilder , 2004 BCSC 644 the principal player in a $36 million tax fraud received 9 years and a $5 million restitution order; in R. v. Bellfield and Minchella , 2003 ......
  • R. v. Wilder (D.M.), 2008 BCCA 370
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (British Columbia)
    • September 19, 2008
    ...from those frauds. Mr. Justice Romilly's reasons for judgment may be found at 2003 BCSC 1840 ("RFJ"), and his reasons for sentence at 2004 BCSC 644 ("RFS"). Leave to appeal the sentence was granted by Prowse, J.A., in May 2007 (2007 BCCA 575). [2] The frauds arose within a sophisticated sch......
  • Get Started for Free
7 cases
  • R. v. Eizenga
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (Ontario)
    • September 24, 2010
    ...105]. R. v. Fitzgibbon, [1990] 1 S.C.R. 1005; 107 N.R. 281; 40 O.A.C. 81, refd to. [para. 106]. R. v. Wilder (D.M.), [2004] B.C.T.C. 644; 2004 BCSC 644, affd. (2008), 259 B.C.A.C. 236; 436 W.A.C. 236; 2008 BCCA 370, refd to. [para. R. v. Lawrence (R.E.) et al. - see R. v. Wilder (D.M.). Sta......
  • R. v. Wilder (D.M.)
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (British Columbia)
    • September 19, 2008
    ...from those frauds. Mr. Justice Romilly's reasons for judgment may be found at 2003 BCSC 1840 ("RFJ"), and his reasons for sentence at 2004 BCSC 644 ("RFS"). Leave to appeal the sentence was granted by Prowse, J.A., in May 2007 (2007 BCCA 575). [2] The frauds arose within a sophisticated sch......
  • R. v. Bulua (C.S.)
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada)
    • May 19, 2006
    ...1, 140 C.C.C. (3d) 449, 2005 SCC 5. 18. A lack of criminal record in "white collar" crime is not a mitigating factor: HMTQ v. Wilder , 2004 BCSC 644, at para. 72. [104] For the foregoing reasons, the sentence of the trial judge should not be interfered with. It follows that the appeal from ......
  • R v Peers
    • Canada
    • Court of Queen's Bench of Alberta (Canada)
    • December 12, 2017
    ...In the case of what are called “white collar” offences the absence of a criminal record is typically less significant: R v Wilder, 2004 BCSC 644 at para 72; R v Keresztes, 2015 ABCA 48 at para 9. Choosing to treat the absence of a criminal record as a neutral factor on the sentencing of thi......
  • Get Started for Free
2 books & journal articles
  • Restitution
    • Canada
    • Criminal Law Series Prosecuting and Defending Fraud Cases, 2nd Edition
    • May 3, 2021
    ...sentence amounts to excessive punishment. See R. v. Siemens (1999), 136 C.C.C. (3d) 353 (Man. C.A.). … [110] As in Wilder [ R v Wilder , 2004 BCSC 644 , aff’d 2008 BCCA 370 ], Eizenga alleges that he cannot afford to pay as he has disposed of all the money. At the same time, the ultimate di......
  • Anatomy Of A Tax Prosecution: A Practical Guide
    • Canada
    • Irwin Books Archive Advocacy and Taxation in Canada Part One Trial Advocacy
    • August 27, 2004
    ...B.C.J. No. 355 (S.C.), 7 year sentences were imposed for a $17 million Scientific Research Tax Credit (“SRTC”) fraud; in R. v. Wilder , 2004 BCSC 644 the principal player in a $36 million tax fraud received 9 years and a $5 million restitution order; in R. v. Bellfield and Minchella , 2003 ......