R. v. Wong (W.W.)

JurisdictionBritish Columbia
CourtCourt of Appeal (British Columbia)
JudgeSaunders, Harris and Fitch, JJ.A.
Citation2016 BCCA 416
Date26 October 2016
Subject MatterCRIMINAL LAW,CIVIL RIGHTS

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex
10 practice notes
  • R. v. Wong
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court (Canada)
    • May 25, 2018
    ...Reform. Ottawa: Justice Canada, 2002. APPEAL from a judgment of the British Columbia Court of Appeal (Saunders, Harris and Fitch JJ.A.), 2016 BCCA 416, 342 C.C.C. (3d) 435 , 47 Imm. L.R. (4th) 171 , [2016] B.C.J. No. 2215 (QL), 2016 CarswellBC 2949 (WL Can.), affirming the conviction of......
  • R. v. Price
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court of Newfoundland and Labrador (Canada)
    • February 22, 2022
    ...22; R. v. Archer (2005), 202 C.C.C. (3d) 60, [2005] O.J. No. 4348 (C.A.); R. v. Ryan, 2012 NLCA 9; R. v. G.C., 2018 ONCA 392; R. v. Wong, 2016 BCCA 416; R. v. White (1997), 114 C.C.C. (3d) 225, [1997] O.J. No. 961 (C.A.); R. v. X.X.S (2006), 68 W.C.B. (2d) 377, [2006] O.J. No. 5 (Sup. Ct. J......
  • R. v. Hamzehali
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (British Columbia)
    • August 2, 2017
    ...is, at minimum, a factor to consider in the ineffective assistance of counsel analysis: see R. v. Quick, 2016 ONCA 95, and R. v. Wong, 2016 BCCA 416. [73] Therefore, if Mr. Gawley failed to advise Mr. Hamzehali about the plea resolution offer in a meaningful way and failed to advise him of ......
  • R. v. Lam
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (British Columbia)
    • October 13, 2020
    ...guilty had the consequences of doing so been known. I made allowance for inductive reasoning in this context in my reasons in R. v. Wong, 2016 BCCA 416 at para. 69, aff’d 2018 SCC 25 . Additionally, I note that R. v. Zamiara, 2020 QCCA 841 , may be read as providing some support for the p......
  • Get Started for Free
9 cases
  • R. v. Wong
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court (Canada)
    • May 25, 2018
    ...Reform. Ottawa: Justice Canada, 2002. APPEAL from a judgment of the British Columbia Court of Appeal (Saunders, Harris and Fitch JJ.A.), 2016 BCCA 416, 342 C.C.C. (3d) 435 , 47 Imm. L.R. (4th) 171 , [2016] B.C.J. No. 2215 (QL), 2016 CarswellBC 2949 (WL Can.), affirming the conviction of......
  • R. v. Price
    • Canada
    • February 22, 2022
    ...22; R. v. Archer (2005), 202 C.C.C. (3d) 60, [2005] O.J. No. 4348 (C.A.); R. v. Ryan, 2012 NLCA 9; R. v. G.C., 2018 ONCA 392; R. v. Wong, 2016 BCCA 416; R. v. White (1997), 114 C.C.C. (3d) 225, [1997] O.J. No. 961 (C.A.); R. v. X.X.S (2006), 68 W.C.B. (2d) 377, [2006] O.J. No. 5 (Sup. Ct. J......
  • R. v. Hamzehali
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (British Columbia)
    • August 2, 2017
    ...is, at minimum, a factor to consider in the ineffective assistance of counsel analysis: see R. v. Quick, 2016 ONCA 95, and R. v. Wong, 2016 BCCA 416. [73] Therefore, if Mr. Gawley failed to advise Mr. Hamzehali about the plea resolution offer in a meaningful way and failed to advise him of ......
  • R. v. Lam
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (British Columbia)
    • October 13, 2020
    ...guilty had the consequences of doing so been known. I made allowance for inductive reasoning in this context in my reasons in R. v. Wong, 2016 BCCA 416 at para. 69, aff’d 2018 SCC 25 . Additionally, I note that R. v. Zamiara, 2020 QCCA 841 , may be read as providing some support for the p......
  • Get Started for Free