R. v. Worrie, 2019 ONSC 4548
| Judge | BARNES J. |
| Court | Superior Court of Justice of Ontario (Canada) |
| Case Date | July 30, 2019 |
| Jurisdiction | Ontario |
| Citations | 2019 ONSC 4548 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
2 practice notes
-
R. v. Mehl,
...they formed the basis for their opinions: R. v. Palma (2000), 149 C.C.C. (3d) 338 at paras. 36–40 (Ont. Sup. Ct.); R. v. Worrie, 2019 ONSC 4548 at paras. [234] It is reasonable to suppose, based on the advice Mr. Mills’ gave to the appellant in relation......
-
R. v. Chang,
...at para. 375: 375 In considering the relevant expert evidence, I am mindful of the evidentiary principles described in R. v. Worrie, 2019 ONSC 4548, at paras. 65, 66 and 55 as follows: An accused cannot lead evidence from an expert to prove that what he told the expert about his delusions o......
2 cases
-
R. v. Mehl,
...they formed the basis for their opinions: R. v. Palma (2000), 149 C.C.C. (3d) 338 at paras. 36–40 (Ont. Sup. Ct.); R. v. Worrie, 2019 ONSC 4548 at paras. [234] It is reasonable to suppose, based on the advice Mr. Mills’ gave to the appellant in relation......
-
R. v. Chang,
...at para. 375: 375 In considering the relevant expert evidence, I am mindful of the evidentiary principles described in R. v. Worrie, 2019 ONSC 4548, at paras. 65, 66 and 55 as follows: An accused cannot lead evidence from an expert to prove that what he told the expert about his delusions o......