R. v. Zhu (D.D.J.)

JurisdictionBritish Columbia
CourtCourt of Appeal (British Columbia)
JudgeKirkpatrick, Groberman and Bennett, JJ.A.
Citation(2013), 338 B.C.A.C. 9 (CA),2013 BCCA 118
Date05 March 2013
Subject MatterCRIMINAL LAW

R. v. Zhu (D.D.J.) (2013), 338 B.C.A.C. 9 (CA);

    577 W.A.C. 9

MLB headnote and full text

Temp. Cite: [2013] B.C.A.C. TBEd. JN.011

Regina (respondent) v. Darren De Jun Zhu (appellant)

(CA039494; 2013 BCCA 118)

Indexed As: R. v. Zhu (D.D.J.)

British Columbia Court of Appeal

Kirkpatrick, Groberman and Bennett, JJ.A.

March 6, 2013.

Summary:

The accused was convicted of possession of three loaded handguns, which were found when premises he was occupying were searched as part of a drug investigation. The accused appealed.

The British Columbia Court of Appeal dismissed the appeal.

Criminal Law - Topic 1439

Offences against person and reputation - Firearms - General - Unlawful possession - See paragraphs 16 to 22.

Criminal Law - Topic 4358

Procedure - Charge or directions - Jury or judge alone - Directions regarding circumstantial evidence - See paragraphs 16 to 22.

Cases Noticed:

R. v. Griffin (J.) et al., [2009] 2 S.C.R. 42; 388 N.R. 334; 2009 SCC 28, refd to. [para. 17].

R. v. Vu (T.T.) (2004), 201 B.C.A.C. 293; 328 W.A.C. 293; 2004 BCCA 381, refd to. [para. 17].

R. v. Morin, [1988] 2 S.C.R. 345; 88 N.R. 161; 30 O.A.C. 81; 44 C.C.C.(3d) 193, refd to. [para. 18].

R. v. E.R. (2002), 171 B.C.A.C. 223; 280 W.A.C. 223; 2002 BCCA 361, refd to. [para. 21].

R. v. Noble (S.J.), [1997] 1 S.C.R. 874; 210 N.R. 321; 89 B.C.A.C. 1; 145 W.A.C. 1, refd to. [para. 21].

Counsel:

B.V. Bagnall, for the appellant;

W.P. Riley, for the respondent.

This appeal was heard at Vancouver, B.C., on March 5, 2013, by Kirkpatrick, Groberman and Bennett, JJ.A., of the British Columbia Court of Appeal. The oral reasons for judgment of the Court of Appeal were delivered on March 6, 2013, and included the following opinions:

Bennett, J.A. - see paragraphs 1 to 22;

Kirkpatrick, J.A. - see paragraphs 23 and 25;

Groberman, J.A. - see paragraph 24.

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex
4 practice notes
  • R. v. Crowther (D.W.)
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (British Columbia)
    • August 13, 2013
    ...to. [para. 63]. R. v. Ngo (M.D.) (2009), 273 B.C.A.C. 174; 461 W.A.C. 174; 2009 BCCA 301, refd to. [para. 63]. R. v. Zhu (D.D.J.) (2013), 338 B.C.A.C. 9; 577 W.A.C. 9; 2013 BCCA 118, refd to. [para. R. v. Harper, [1982] 1 S.C.R. 2; 40 N.R. 255, refd to. [para. 68]. Counsel: R.A. Mulligan, Q......
  • R. v. Caron (J.V.)
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (British Columbia)
    • February 19, 2014
    ...to. [para. 44]. R. v. Griffin (J.) et al., [2009] 2 S.C.R. 42; 388 N.R. 334; 2009 SCC 28, refd to. [para. 47]. R. v. Zhu (D.D.J.) (2013), 338 B.C.A.C. 9; 577 W.A.C. 9; 2013 BCCA 118, refd to. [para. R. v. Wilkinson (T.E.) (2010), 289 B.C.A.C. 161; 489 W.A.C. 161; 2010 BCCA 316, refd to. [pa......
  • R. v. Zhu (D.D.J.), (2013) 344 B.C.A.C. 46 (CA)
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (British Columbia)
    • September 20, 2013
    ...to appeal the sentence, and if leave was granted, appealed the sentences. The British Columbia Court of Appeal, in a decision reported at 338 B.C.A.C. 9; 577 W.A.C. 9, dismissed the conviction The British Columbia Court of Appeal granted leave to appeal the sentences. The appeal with respec......
  • R. v. Aschert
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada)
    • March 10, 2017
    ...all the evidence taken in its totality proves the accused’s guilt and is inconsistent with any other rational conclusion (R. v. Zhu, 2013 BCCA 118 at para. V. SUBMISSIONS OF THE PARTIES A. The Crown’s Submissions [27] The Crown says that the circumstantial evidence establishes the irresisti......
4 cases
  • R. v. Crowther (D.W.)
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (British Columbia)
    • August 13, 2013
    ...to. [para. 63]. R. v. Ngo (M.D.) (2009), 273 B.C.A.C. 174; 461 W.A.C. 174; 2009 BCCA 301, refd to. [para. 63]. R. v. Zhu (D.D.J.) (2013), 338 B.C.A.C. 9; 577 W.A.C. 9; 2013 BCCA 118, refd to. [para. R. v. Harper, [1982] 1 S.C.R. 2; 40 N.R. 255, refd to. [para. 68]. Counsel: R.A. Mulligan, Q......
  • R. v. Caron (J.V.)
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (British Columbia)
    • February 19, 2014
    ...to. [para. 44]. R. v. Griffin (J.) et al., [2009] 2 S.C.R. 42; 388 N.R. 334; 2009 SCC 28, refd to. [para. 47]. R. v. Zhu (D.D.J.) (2013), 338 B.C.A.C. 9; 577 W.A.C. 9; 2013 BCCA 118, refd to. [para. R. v. Wilkinson (T.E.) (2010), 289 B.C.A.C. 161; 489 W.A.C. 161; 2010 BCCA 316, refd to. [pa......
  • R. v. Zhu (D.D.J.), (2013) 344 B.C.A.C. 46 (CA)
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (British Columbia)
    • September 20, 2013
    ...to appeal the sentence, and if leave was granted, appealed the sentences. The British Columbia Court of Appeal, in a decision reported at 338 B.C.A.C. 9; 577 W.A.C. 9, dismissed the conviction The British Columbia Court of Appeal granted leave to appeal the sentences. The appeal with respec......
  • R. v. Aschert
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada)
    • March 10, 2017
    ...all the evidence taken in its totality proves the accused’s guilt and is inconsistent with any other rational conclusion (R. v. Zhu, 2013 BCCA 118 at para. V. SUBMISSIONS OF THE PARTIES A. The Crown’s Submissions [27] The Crown says that the circumstantial evidence establishes the irresisti......