Rajput v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2022 FC 65
| Jurisdiction | Federal Jurisdiction (Canada) |
| Court | Federal Court (Canada) |
| Citation | 2022 FC 65 |
| Date | 19 January 2022 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
7 practice notes
-
Bishop v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2022 FC 569
...do not make it possible to understand the decision maker’s reasoning on a critical point (Rajput v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2022 FC 65 at para 34). [24] In Ms. Bishop’s case, I do not find that the Decision exhibits any logical fallacy. Even if the reasons on the police warning......
-
Askari v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2023 FC 1318
...on other relevant evidence contradicting the decision maker’s finding of fact (see Rajput v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2022 FC 65 at para 25). Instead, the decision maker must demonstrate that all of the evidence was considered and weighed, and explain why contradicting ev......
-
Amarasingam v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2023 FC 655
...in light of the contradicting evidence, to dismiss the application (Ehigiator at para 74; Rajput v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2022 FC 65 at para [43] In my view, the Applicant provided documentary evidence showing that Tamils were facing growing discrimination in Sri Lanka today ......
-
Ehigiator v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2023 FC 308
...or ignore relevant evidence contradicting the decision maker’s finding of fact (see Rajput v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2022 FC 65 at para 25) [Rajput]. Instead, the RAD had the burden to explain why no or little weight had to be assigned to the contradicting evidence and ......
Request a trial to view additional results
7 cases
-
Bishop v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2022 FC 569
...do not make it possible to understand the decision maker’s reasoning on a critical point (Rajput v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2022 FC 65 at para 34). [24] In Ms. Bishop’s case, I do not find that the Decision exhibits any logical fallacy. Even if the reasons on the police warning......
-
Askari v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2023 FC 1318
...on other relevant evidence contradicting the decision maker’s finding of fact (see Rajput v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2022 FC 65 at para 25). Instead, the decision maker must demonstrate that all of the evidence was considered and weighed, and explain why contradicting ev......
-
Amarasingam v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2023 FC 655
...in light of the contradicting evidence, to dismiss the application (Ehigiator at para 74; Rajput v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2022 FC 65 at para [43] In my view, the Applicant provided documentary evidence showing that Tamils were facing growing discrimination in Sri Lanka today ......
-
Ehigiator v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2023 FC 308
...or ignore relevant evidence contradicting the decision maker’s finding of fact (see Rajput v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2022 FC 65 at para 25) [Rajput]. Instead, the RAD had the burden to explain why no or little weight had to be assigned to the contradicting evidence and ......
Request a trial to view additional results