Ram Western Express Ltd. v. Baskin et al., [2004] O.T.C. 740 (SC)

• Judge: Ferguson, J.
• Court: Superior Court of Justice of Ontario (Canada)
• Case Date: August 05, 2004
• Jurisdiction: Ontario
• Citations: [2004] O.T.C. 740 (SC)

Ram Western Express Ltd. v. Baskin, [2004] O.T.C. 740 (SC)

MLB headnote and full text

Temp. Cite: [2004] O.T.C. TBEd. AU.089

Ram Western Express Ltd. (plaintiff) v. Jason Andrew Baskin, Robert James Collette, Dean Arthur, Randi Banting, 1124396 Ontario Inc. and Southern Ontario Express Ltd. (defendants)

(Court File No. 67941/03)

Indexed As: Ram Western Express Ltd. v. Baskin et al.

Court of Ontario

Superior Court of Justice

Ferguson, J.

August 11, 2004.

Summary:

This headnote contains no summary.

Practice - Topic 4123

Joinder of causes and consolidations - Consolidation of actions and applications - When not available - See paragraphs 1 to 22.

Practice - Topic 9765

Small claims - Transfers out of Small Claims Court - See paragraphs 19 to 21.

Cases Noticed:

Pilon v. Janveaux et al., [2000] O.T.C. Uned. C55 (Sup. Ct.), refd to. [para. 13].

Hillcrest Housing Ltd. and Clans Ltd., Re (1986), 56 Nfld. & P.E.I.R. 237; 168 A.P.R. 237 (P.E.I.S.C.), refd to. [para. 15].

Ellis-Don Management Services et al. v. Rae-Dawn Construction Ltd. et al. (1992), 131 A.R. 190; 25 W.A.C. 190 (C.A.), refd to. [para. 17].

Rae-Dawn Construction Ltd. v. Edmonton (City) - see Ellis-Don Management Services et al. v. Rae-Dawn Construction Ltd. et al.

Vigna v. Toronto Stock Exchange et al. (1998), 115 O.A.C. 393 (Div. Ct.), refd to. [para. 20].

Authors and Works Noticed:

Carswell's Civil Practice Partner (2001) (Release 4), generally [para. 13].

Counsel:

F. Scott Turton, for the plaintiff;

Eric R. Finn, for the defendants, Jason Andrew Baskin, Robert James Collette and Southern Ontario Express Ltd.;

Melvin I. Rotman, for the defendant, Dean Arthur;

Randi Banting, for himself and 1124396 Ontario Inc.

This motion was heard on August 5, 2004, before Ferguson, J., of the Ontario Superior Court, who released the following decision on August 11, 2004.

Please note: The following judgment has not been edited.