Ramanathan v. Canada (Attorney General),
| Jurisdiction | Federal Jurisdiction (Canada) |
| Court | Federal Court (Canada) |
| Date | 27 July 2023 |
| Citation | 2023 FC 1029 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Start Your 7-day Trial
4 practice notes
-
Komleva v. Canada (Attorney General), 2024 FC 1562
...[1999] 2 SCR 817 at para 21; Taseko Mines Limited v Canada (Environment), 2019 FCA 320 at para 30; Ramanathan v Canada (Attorney General), 2023 FC 1029 at para 42 [29] The CRA’s procedural fairness obligations in the context of a CRB decision is at the low end of the spectrum: Moncada v Can......
-
Cozak v. Canada (Attorney General),
...procedural fairness obligations incumbent on the CRA are generally on the low end of the spectrum (Ramanathan v Canada (Attorney General), 2023 FC 1029 at para 46). Despite the Applicant’s submissions to the contrary, he had numerous opportunities to provide additional documentation ......
-
Moncada v. Canada (Attorney General),
...CRB decision, requirements which are “generally on the low end of the spectrum” (Ramanathan v Canada (Attorney General), 2023 FC 1029 at para B. Reasonableness [33] Mr. Moncada submits that the conclusion that he did not meet the minimum threshold of income for the CRB is inco......
-
Kohli v. Canada (Attorney General), 2024 FC 1706
...that a certain procedure will be followed in arriving at the decision. As identified in Ramanathan v Canada (Attorney General), 2023 FC 1029 [Ramanathan] at paragraph 47, legitimate expectations represent one of the factors identified in Baker v Canada (Minister of Citizenship and Immigrati......
2 cases
-
Cozak v. Canada (Attorney General),
...procedural fairness obligations incumbent on the CRA are generally on the low end of the spectrum (Ramanathan v Canada (Attorney General), 2023 FC 1029 at para 46). Despite the Applicant’s submissions to the contrary, he had numerous opportunities to provide additional documentation ......
-
Moncada v. Canada (Attorney General),
...CRB decision, requirements which are “generally on the low end of the spectrum” (Ramanathan v Canada (Attorney General), 2023 FC 1029 at para B. Reasonableness [33] Mr. Moncada submits that the conclusion that he did not meet the minimum threshold of income for the CRB is inco......