Ramara (Township) v. Mullen,
| Jurisdiction | Ontario |
| Judge | Healey, J. |
| Court | Superior Court of Justice of Ontario (Canada) |
| Citation | 2012 ONSC 2959,[2012] O.T.C. Uned. 2959,[2012] O.T.C. Uned. 2959 (SC) |
| Date | 18 May 2012 |
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeUnlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Start Your 7-day Trial
2 practice notes
-
Home Trust Co. v. Kitchener (City)
...on the following proposition found in paragraph 8 of the Endorsement on Costs in the Corporation of the Township of Ramara v. Mullen , 2012 ONSC 2959 (CanLII): For an issue to be novel in a way that is legally significant, it might be argued that the issue should not only be one which has n......
-
Yorkwest Plumbing Supply Inc. v. Nortown Plumbing (1998) Ltd. et al.
...there are conflicts among the cases or a limitation on the appropriate scope of their application (see: Ramara (Township) v. Mullen , 2012 ONSC 2959, at para. 8). [10] Finally, novel issues of law do not necessarily give rise to an order that no costs will be awarded. As the Divisional Cour......
2 cases
-
Home Trust Co. v. Kitchener (City),
...on the following proposition found in paragraph 8 of the Endorsement on Costs in the Corporation of the Township of Ramara v. Mullen , 2012 ONSC 2959 (CanLII): For an issue to be novel in a way that is legally significant, it might be argued that the issue should not only be one which has n......
-
Yorkwest Plumbing Supply Inc. v. Nortown Plumbing (1998) Ltd. et al.,
...there are conflicts among the cases or a limitation on the appropriate scope of their application (see: Ramara (Township) v. Mullen , 2012 ONSC 2959, at para. 8). [10] Finally, novel issues of law do not necessarily give rise to an order that no costs will be awarded. As the Divisional Cour......