Randhawa v. Legendary Developments Ltd., 2006 BCSC 2006
| Jurisdiction | British Columbia |
| Judge | Brine, J. |
| Court | Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada) |
| Subject Matter | SALE OF LAND,PRACTICE |
| Citation | 2006 BCSC 2006,[2006] B.C.T.C. Uned. A01 |
| Date | 27 December 2006 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
2 practice notes
-
Hayward v. Bennett, [2010] B.C.T.C. Uned. 1465
...other grounds, 2006 BCCA 203, leave to appeal to S.C.C. ref'd, [2006] S.C.C.A, No. 247. [22] In Randhawa v. Legendary Developments Ltd. , 2006 BCSC 2006, Mr. Justice Brine refused the defendant's application to dismiss the plaintiff's claim for specific performance. The contract was for the......
-
Sutton v. Sodhi, 2017 BCSC 325
...all were in the range of $100,000 or more above the Suttons' maximum affordable price. In Randhawa v. Legendary Developments Ltd., 2006 BCSC 2006, Brine J. noted that in a rising market the replacement cost of property is to be taken into [12] Generally speaking, when one considers the issu......
2 cases
-
Hayward v. Bennett, [2010] B.C.T.C. Uned. 1465
...other grounds, 2006 BCCA 203, leave to appeal to S.C.C. ref'd, [2006] S.C.C.A, No. 247. [22] In Randhawa v. Legendary Developments Ltd. , 2006 BCSC 2006, Mr. Justice Brine refused the defendant's application to dismiss the plaintiff's claim for specific performance. The contract was for the......
-
Sutton v. Sodhi, 2017 BCSC 325
...all were in the range of $100,000 or more above the Suttons' maximum affordable price. In Randhawa v. Legendary Developments Ltd., 2006 BCSC 2006, Brine J. noted that in a rising market the replacement cost of property is to be taken into [12] Generally speaking, when one considers the issu......