RAPP v. BAUMANN, 2019 SKQB 211

JurisdictionSaskatchewan
JudgeBROWN
Citation2019 SKQB 211
Docket NumberFLD 157 of 2009
CourtCourt of Queen's Bench of Saskatchewan (Canada)
Date27 August 2019
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
3 practice notes
  • NEMETCHEK v NEMETCHEK,
    • Canada
    • Court of Queen's Bench of Saskatchewan (Canada)
    • July 13, 2022
    ...a right to apply for a reconsideration of an issue on the merits. See: Knobel v Knobel, 2015 SKQB 67, 456 Sask R 115, Rapp v Baumann, 2019 SKQB 211, O’Krane v Misfeldt, 2002 SKQB 519, 229 Sask R 174, Royal Bank of Canada v Viloria, 2014 SKQB 424, 464 Sask R 177, A.V.R. v M.J.A., 2017......
  • Armbruster v Barrett,
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (Saskatchewan)
    • December 23, 2020
    ...the procedural fairness issue, I wish to briefly comment on the suggestion that the Chambers judge improperly relied on Rapp v Baumann, 2019 SKQB 211 [Rapp], which was a decision that came out while this matter was under reserve. Mr. Armbruster argues that, had he been alerted to the p......
  • SCOTIA MORTGAGE CORPORATION v. JASON GARRY MCNAUGHTON AND TINA AVERY,
    • Canada
    • Court of Queen's Bench of Saskatchewan (Canada)
    • May 27, 2021
    ...See also Rapp v Baumann, 2019 SKQB 211 at paras 11 and 14. In light of these authorities, there is jurisdiction to re-hear the application where a formal judgment roll has not been issued. [8]                &#x......
3 cases
  • NEMETCHEK v NEMETCHEK,
    • Canada
    • Court of Queen's Bench of Saskatchewan (Canada)
    • July 13, 2022
    ...a right to apply for a reconsideration of an issue on the merits. See: Knobel v Knobel, 2015 SKQB 67, 456 Sask R 115, Rapp v Baumann, 2019 SKQB 211, O’Krane v Misfeldt, 2002 SKQB 519, 229 Sask R 174, Royal Bank of Canada v Viloria, 2014 SKQB 424, 464 Sask R 177, A.V.R. v M.J.A., 2017......
  • Armbruster v Barrett,
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (Saskatchewan)
    • December 23, 2020
    ...the procedural fairness issue, I wish to briefly comment on the suggestion that the Chambers judge improperly relied on Rapp v Baumann, 2019 SKQB 211 [Rapp], which was a decision that came out while this matter was under reserve. Mr. Armbruster argues that, had he been alerted to the p......
  • SCOTIA MORTGAGE CORPORATION v. JASON GARRY MCNAUGHTON AND TINA AVERY,
    • Canada
    • Court of Queen's Bench of Saskatchewan (Canada)
    • May 27, 2021
    ...See also Rapp v Baumann, 2019 SKQB 211 at paras 11 and 14. In light of these authorities, there is jurisdiction to re-hear the application where a formal judgment roll has not been issued. [8]                &#x......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT