RAPP v. BAUMANN, 2019 SKQB 211
Jurisdiction | Saskatchewan |
Judge | BROWN |
Citation | 2019 SKQB 211 |
Docket Number | FLD 157 of 2009 |
Court | Court of Queen's Bench of Saskatchewan (Canada) |
Date | 27 August 2019 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
3 practice notes
-
NEMETCHEK v NEMETCHEK,
...a right to apply for a reconsideration of an issue on the merits. See: Knobel v Knobel, 2015 SKQB 67, 456 Sask R 115, Rapp v Baumann, 2019 SKQB 211, O’Krane v Misfeldt, 2002 SKQB 519, 229 Sask R 174, Royal Bank of Canada v Viloria, 2014 SKQB 424, 464 Sask R 177, A.V.R. v M.J.A., 2017......
-
Armbruster v Barrett,
...the procedural fairness issue, I wish to briefly comment on the suggestion that the Chambers judge improperly relied on Rapp v Baumann, 2019 SKQB 211 [Rapp], which was a decision that came out while this matter was under reserve. Mr. Armbruster argues that, had he been alerted to the p......
-
SCOTIA MORTGAGE CORPORATION v. JASON GARRY MCNAUGHTON AND TINA AVERY,
...See also Rapp v Baumann, 2019 SKQB 211 at paras 11 and 14. In light of these authorities, there is jurisdiction to re-hear the application where a formal judgment roll has not been issued. [8] ......
3 cases
-
NEMETCHEK v NEMETCHEK,
...a right to apply for a reconsideration of an issue on the merits. See: Knobel v Knobel, 2015 SKQB 67, 456 Sask R 115, Rapp v Baumann, 2019 SKQB 211, O’Krane v Misfeldt, 2002 SKQB 519, 229 Sask R 174, Royal Bank of Canada v Viloria, 2014 SKQB 424, 464 Sask R 177, A.V.R. v M.J.A., 2017......
-
Armbruster v Barrett,
...the procedural fairness issue, I wish to briefly comment on the suggestion that the Chambers judge improperly relied on Rapp v Baumann, 2019 SKQB 211 [Rapp], which was a decision that came out while this matter was under reserve. Mr. Armbruster argues that, had he been alerted to the p......
-
SCOTIA MORTGAGE CORPORATION v. JASON GARRY MCNAUGHTON AND TINA AVERY,
...See also Rapp v Baumann, 2019 SKQB 211 at paras 11 and 14. In light of these authorities, there is jurisdiction to re-hear the application where a formal judgment roll has not been issued. [8] ......