RDX Technologies Corporation v Appel, 2019 ABCA 338
| Judge | Mr. Justice Kevin Feehan |
| Citation | 2019 ABCA 338 |
| Docket Number | 1901-0216-AC |
| Court | Court of Appeal (Alberta) |
| Date | 16 September 2019 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
3 practice notes
-
PricewaterhouseCoopers Inc v Perpetual Energy Inc, 2020 ABCA 36
...question to be tried and the appeal is not frivolous is sufficient consideration of the merits: see RDX Technologies Corporation v Appel, 2019 ABCA 338 at para 37. [36] The respondent has suggested various grounds of appeal which may be reviewed on a correctness standard. At this stage, I c......
-
Molsberry v 866565 Alberta Ltd, 2020 ABCA 291
...question to be tried and the appeal is not frivolous is sufficient consideration of the merits: RDX Technologies Corporation v Appel, 2019 ABCA 338 at para 37. At this stage, I cannot say that the appeal lacks Undue Prejudice [18] There is no evidence before this Court suggesting that Mr. M......
-
Bains v Adam,
...stayed. I may also consider interests beyond those of the parties, including the public interest: RDX Technologies Corporation v Appel, 2019 ABCA 338 at para 18. [24] I am not satisfied the balance of convenience favours a stay of the majority......
3 cases
-
PricewaterhouseCoopers Inc v Perpetual Energy Inc, 2020 ABCA 36
...question to be tried and the appeal is not frivolous is sufficient consideration of the merits: see RDX Technologies Corporation v Appel, 2019 ABCA 338 at para 37. [36] The respondent has suggested various grounds of appeal which may be reviewed on a correctness standard. At this stage, I c......
-
Molsberry v 866565 Alberta Ltd, 2020 ABCA 291
...question to be tried and the appeal is not frivolous is sufficient consideration of the merits: RDX Technologies Corporation v Appel, 2019 ABCA 338 at para 37. At this stage, I cannot say that the appeal lacks Undue Prejudice [18] There is no evidence before this Court suggesting that Mr. M......
-
Bains v Adam,
...stayed. I may also consider interests beyond those of the parties, including the public interest: RDX Technologies Corporation v Appel, 2019 ABCA 338 at para 18. [24] I am not satisfied the balance of convenience favours a stay of the majority......