Red Chris Development Co. v. Quock et al., 2014 BCSC 2399
| Jurisdiction | British Columbia |
| Judge | Punnett, J. |
| Court | Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada) |
| Subject Matter | PRACTICE,INJUNCTIONS |
| Date | 18 December 2014 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
17 practice notes
-
Cermaq Canada Ltd. v. Stewart, 2017 BCSC 2526
...being complained of: see Trans Mountain Pipeline ULC v. Gold, 2014 BCSC 2133, at para. 122, Red Chris Development Company Ltd. v. Quock, 2014 BCSC 2399, at para. 64, and British Columbia Hydro and Power Authority v. Boon, 2016 BCSC 355, at para. 67.[83] In this case, the evidence before me ......
-
Teal Cedar Products Ltd. v. Rainforest Flying Squad,
...protesters’ methods, and leave Teal Cedar with no remedy (paras. 51-53). Citing Red Chris Development Company Ltd. v. Quock, 2014 BCSC 2399 at para. 71, he reasoned that it is contrary to the public interest to allow these blockades to continue (para. 55). [6] &#x......
-
Taseko Mines Limited v. Tsilhqot’in National Government, 2019 BCSC 1507
...49 citing Snuneymuxw First Nation et al. v. H.M.T.Q. et al., 2004 BCSC 205 at para. 34; Red Chris Development Company Ltd. v. Quock, 2014 BCSC 2399 at para. [111] Given the nature of Tsilhqot’in’s harm, and the waiver of the undertaking as to damages, there is a material risk of irreparable......
-
Marine Harvest Canada Inc. v. Morton, 2018 BCSC 1302
...rights or title is not a defence to tortious conduct in a private action. [107] In Red Chris Development Company Ltd. v. Quock, 2014 BCSC 2399 [Red Chris Development], an interlocutory injunction was sought in respect of a blockade of two access roads to a mine site in northern British Colu......
Request a trial to view additional results
16 cases
-
Cermaq Canada Ltd. v. Stewart, 2017 BCSC 2526
...being complained of: see Trans Mountain Pipeline ULC v. Gold, 2014 BCSC 2133, at para. 122, Red Chris Development Company Ltd. v. Quock, 2014 BCSC 2399, at para. 64, and British Columbia Hydro and Power Authority v. Boon, 2016 BCSC 355, at para. 67.[83] In this case, the evidence before me ......
-
Teal Cedar Products Ltd. v. Rainforest Flying Squad,
...protesters’ methods, and leave Teal Cedar with no remedy (paras. 51-53). Citing Red Chris Development Company Ltd. v. Quock, 2014 BCSC 2399 at para. 71, he reasoned that it is contrary to the public interest to allow these blockades to continue (para. 55). [6] &#x......
-
Taseko Mines Limited v. Tsilhqot’in National Government, 2019 BCSC 1507
...49 citing Snuneymuxw First Nation et al. v. H.M.T.Q. et al., 2004 BCSC 205 at para. 34; Red Chris Development Company Ltd. v. Quock, 2014 BCSC 2399 at para. [111] Given the nature of Tsilhqot’in’s harm, and the waiver of the undertaking as to damages, there is a material risk of irreparable......
-
Marine Harvest Canada Inc. v. Morton, 2018 BCSC 1302
...rights or title is not a defence to tortious conduct in a private action. [107] In Red Chris Development Company Ltd. v. Quock, 2014 BCSC 2399 [Red Chris Development], an interlocutory injunction was sought in respect of a blockade of two access roads to a mine site in northern British Colu......
Request a trial to view additional results
1 books & journal articles
-
Our Land, Our Way: The Rule of Law, Injunctions, and Indigenous Self-Governance.
...note 56 at para 42 [emphasis added]. (110) Coastal GasLink, supra note 59. (111) Ibid at para 157. (112) Red Chris Company Ltd v Quock, 2014 BCSC 2399. (113) Ibid at para 39; Coastal GasLink, supra note 59 at para (114) Borrows, "Indigenous Constitution", supra note 26. (115) Mayeda, supra ......