Redfern v. Qikiqtani Inuit Association, 2018 NUCJ 13
Judge | Honourable Madam Justice Susan Cooper |
Court | Nunavut Court of Justice (Canada) |
Case Date | May 09, 2018 |
Jurisdiction | Nunavut |
Citations | 2018 NUCJ 13 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
2 practice notes
-
McCargar v Métis Nation of Alberta Association, 2018 ABQB 553
...of Jehovah’s Witnesses (Judicial Committee) v Wall, 2018 SCC 26 at paras 2 & 12-23; Redfern v Qikiqtani Inuit Association, 2018 NUCJ 13 at para 41). “Judicial review is about the legality of state decision making” (Highwood, para 17). On the same basis, no public law remedies are availa......
-
Dylan v. Law Society of Nunavut, 2020 NUCJ 32
...to make on judicial review. They are decisions for the governing organization to make. As stated in Redfern v Qikiqtani Inuit Association, 2018 NUCJ 13 at para 76, mandamus lies to compel an imperative duty. The LSNU is not bound by the Legal Profession Act to prorate membership fees. Accor......
2 cases
-
McCargar v Métis Nation of Alberta Association, 2018 ABQB 553
...of Jehovah’s Witnesses (Judicial Committee) v Wall, 2018 SCC 26 at paras 2 & 12-23; Redfern v Qikiqtani Inuit Association, 2018 NUCJ 13 at para 41). “Judicial review is about the legality of state decision making” (Highwood, para 17). On the same basis, no public law remedies are availa......
-
Dylan v. Law Society of Nunavut, 2020 NUCJ 32
...to make on judicial review. They are decisions for the governing organization to make. As stated in Redfern v Qikiqtani Inuit Association, 2018 NUCJ 13 at para 76, mandamus lies to compel an imperative duty. The LSNU is not bound by the Legal Profession Act to prorate membership fees. Accor......