Render v. ThyssenKrupp Elevator (Canada) Limited

JurisdictionOntario
JudgeFeldman,Pepall,Tulloch
Docket NumberC67826
Date20 April 2022
Citation2022 ONCA 310
CourtCourt of Appeal (Ontario)

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex
13 practice notes
  • Court Of Appeal Summaries (December 16 ' 20, 2024)
    • Canada
    • Mondaq Canada
    • January 3, 2025
    ...Direction Concerning Civil Appeals, Wood v. Fred Deeley Imports Ltd., 2017 ONCA 158, Render v. ThyssenKrupp Elevator (Canada) Limited, 2022 ONCA 310, Rahman v. Cannon Design Architecture Inc., 2022 ONCA 451, Waksdale v. Swegon North America Inc., 2020 ONCA 391 Arcamm Electrical Services Ltd......
  • Wilds v 1959612 Ontario Inc.
    • Canada
    • Superior Court of Justice of Ontario (Canada)
    • June 14, 2024
    ...employee must do something deliberately, knowing they are doing something wrong: see Render v. ThyssenKrupp Elevator (Canada) Limited, 2022 ONCA 310 at paras. iii. Application to this case 62 I find that the termination provisions in the Employment Agreement – i.e., both the termination wit......
  • Better Late Than Never: Employers In Canada Should Review Their Termination Of Employment Provisions
    • Canada
    • Mondaq Canada
    • July 4, 2023
    ...of the other termination provisions included in the contract (see, for example, Render v ThyssenKrupp Elevator (Canada) Limited (2022 ONCA 310) at para. 79). Relatedly, provisions that do not account for minimum statutory requirements upon a termination without cause are likely to be noncom......
  • Paul v Sensient Colors
    • Canada
    • Superior Court of Justice of Ontario (Canada)
    • May 26, 2025
    ...v. Polyone Canada Inc., 2011 ONSC 6068, at para. 55 aff'd 2013 ONCA 47; See also Render v. ThyssenKrupp Elevator (Canada) Limited, 2022 ONCA 310, at para. 79. 80 In this case, Ms. Paul's refusal to disclose her vaccination status (to remain unvaccinated) should not be characterized as an ac......
  • Get Started for Free
8 cases
  • Wilds v 1959612 Ontario Inc.
    • Canada
    • Superior Court of Justice of Ontario (Canada)
    • June 14, 2024
    ...employee must do something deliberately, knowing they are doing something wrong: see Render v. ThyssenKrupp Elevator (Canada) Limited, 2022 ONCA 310 at paras. iii. Application to this case 62 I find that the termination provisions in the Employment Agreement – i.e., both the termination wit......
  • Paul v Sensient Colors
    • Canada
    • Superior Court of Justice of Ontario (Canada)
    • May 26, 2025
    ...v. Polyone Canada Inc., 2011 ONSC 6068, at para. 55 aff'd 2013 ONCA 47; See also Render v. ThyssenKrupp Elevator (Canada) Limited, 2022 ONCA 310, at para. 79. 80 In this case, Ms. Paul's refusal to disclose her vaccination status (to remain unvaccinated) should not be characterized as an ac......
  • Arora v ICICI Bank of Canada
    • Canada
    • Superior Court of Justice of Ontario (Canada)
    • July 23, 2024
    ...or that a flawed investigation is relevant to the issue of whether just cause exists: Render v. ThyssenKrupp Elevator (Canada) Limited, 2022 ONCA 310, 2022 C.L.L.C. 210-041, at para. 65; Golob v. Fort St. John (City), 2021 BCSC 2192, 26 M.P.L.R. (6th) 334, at para. 103 In this case, I do no......
  • Dufault v Ignace (Township)
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (Ontario)
    • December 19, 2024
    ...must provide notice prior to the termination of an employee or pay instead of notice: Render v. ThyssenKrupp Elevator (Canada) Limited, 2022 ONCA 310, at paras. 72-74, 78; Rahman v. Cannon Design Architecture Inc., 2022 ONCA 451, at para. 27. The exception allows for termination without not......
  • Get Started for Free
5 firm's commentaries
  • Court Of Appeal Summaries (December 16 ' 20, 2024)
    • Canada
    • Mondaq Canada
    • January 3, 2025
    ...Direction Concerning Civil Appeals, Wood v. Fred Deeley Imports Ltd., 2017 ONCA 158, Render v. ThyssenKrupp Elevator (Canada) Limited, 2022 ONCA 310, Rahman v. Cannon Design Architecture Inc., 2022 ONCA 451, Waksdale v. Swegon North America Inc., 2020 ONCA 391 Arcamm Electrical Services Ltd......
  • Better Late Than Never: Employers In Canada Should Review Their Termination Of Employment Provisions
    • Canada
    • Mondaq Canada
    • July 4, 2023
    ...of the other termination provisions included in the contract (see, for example, Render v ThyssenKrupp Elevator (Canada) Limited (2022 ONCA 310) at para. 79). Relatedly, provisions that do not account for minimum statutory requirements upon a termination without cause are likely to be noncom......
  • Wilful Misconduct: An Onerous Standard
    • Canada
    • Mondaq Canada
    • June 16, 2023
    ...between just cause for termination (common law) and wilful misconduct (ESA). In Render v. ThyssenKrupp Elevator (Canada) Limited, 2022 ONCA 310, an employee was dismissed for cause after slapping a female co-worker on her buttocks. While the court agreed with the trial judge that Mr. Render......
  • Park v. Costco: Ontario Court Upholds Just Cause Dismissal Of Employee Who Intentionally Deleted Company Website
    • Canada
    • Mondaq Canada
    • March 29, 2023
    ...was met, but not the higher ESA standard of wilful misconduct) can be seen in the Court of Appeal's recent decision in Render v. Thyssen, 2022 ONCA 310 (previously reported on Additional Issues Finally, Justice Ryan Bell rejected both Mr. Park's assertion that Costco had failed to conduct a......
  • Get Started for Free