Richardson et al. v. Hemlock Construction Ltd., [2014] B.C.T.C. Uned. 200 (SCM)
| Jurisdiction | British Columbia |
| Subject Matter | EVIDENCE,PRACTICE |
| Citation | [2014] B.C.T.C. Uned. 200 (SCM),[2014] B.C.T.C. Uned. 200,2014 BCSC 200 |
| Court | Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada) |
| Date | 07 February 2014 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
1 practice notes
-
Lutoborska v. Nyquvest, [2015] B.C.T.C. Uned. 557 (SC)
...that costs for an application in a family law case should be costs in the cause, relying on Richardson v. Hemlock Construction Ltd. , 2014 BCSC 200, Dahl v. Dahl , [1990] B.C.W.L.D. 1590 (C.A.) and Wilson v. Brown , 2010 BCSC 249. [23] The claimant submits that costs should not be in the ca......
1 cases
-
Lutoborska v. Nyquvest, [2015] B.C.T.C. Uned. 557 (SC)
...that costs for an application in a family law case should be costs in the cause, relying on Richardson v. Hemlock Construction Ltd. , 2014 BCSC 200, Dahl v. Dahl , [1990] B.C.W.L.D. 1590 (C.A.) and Wilson v. Brown , 2010 BCSC 249. [23] The claimant submits that costs should not be in the ca......