Richter & Associés Inc. v. Québec (Sous-ministre du Revenu) et al.,
| Jurisdiction | Federal Jurisdiction (Canada) |
| Judge | Lamer, C.J.C., L'Heureux-Dubé, Gonthier, Cory, McLachlin, Iacobucci, Major, Bastarache and Binnie, JJ. |
| Court | Supreme Court (Canada) |
| Citation | [1999] N.R. Uned. 31 (SCC),[1999] N.R. Uned. 31,182 DLR (4th) 114,[1999] 1 SCR 759,1999 CanLII 682 (SCC),24 CBR (4th) 113 |
| Date | 29 April 1999 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Start Your 7-day Trial
16 practice notes
-
Singh c. Canada (Citoyenneté et Immigration),
...School Boards’ Assn. of Alberta v. Alberta (Attorney General), 2000 SCC 2, [2000] 1 S.C.R. 44; Palmer et al. v. The Queen, [1980] 1 S.C.R. 759, (1979), 106 D.L.R. (3d) 212; J.T.I. MacDonald Corp. v. Canada (Attorney General), [2004] J.Q. No. 9409 (C.A.) (QL); Morin v. Regional Admini......
-
Court Of Appeal Summaries (October 12-15, 2021)
...2021 ONCA 703 Keywords: Family Law, Child Support, Spousal Support, Civil Procedure, Fresh Evidence, Costs, Palmer v. The Queen, 1980 1 SCR 759, Family Law Rules, O. Reg. 114/99, Spousal Support Advisory Guidelines: The Revised User's Guide (April 2016), Moge v. Moge, 1992 3 SCR 813 2619506......
-
Court Of Appeal Summaries (October 12-15, 2021)
...2021 ONCA 703 Keywords: Family Law, Child Support, Spousal Support, Civil Procedure, Fresh Evidence, Costs, Palmer v. The Queen, 1980 1 SCR 759, Family Law Rules, O. Reg. 114/99, Spousal Support Advisory Guidelines: The Revised User's Guide (April 2016), Moge v. Moge, 1992 3 SCR 813 2619506......
-
Mental Disorder 2023 Criminal Code of Canada Annotations (Part XX.1)
...being led for the first time on appeal in this case. The test for admitting fresh evidence on appeal established by R. v. Palmer, [1980] 1 S.C.R. 759 (1) The evidence should generally not be admitted if, by due diligence, it could have been adduced at trial provided that this general princi......
Get Started for Free
12 cases
-
Singh c. Canada (Citoyenneté et Immigration),
...School Boards’ Assn. of Alberta v. Alberta (Attorney General), 2000 SCC 2, [2000] 1 S.C.R. 44; Palmer et al. v. The Queen, [1980] 1 S.C.R. 759, (1979), 106 D.L.R. (3d) 212; J.T.I. MacDonald Corp. v. Canada (Attorney General), [2004] J.Q. No. 9409 (C.A.) (QL); Morin v. Regional Admini......
-
CIBC Mortgages Inc. v. Sicoli, 2013 ABQB 451
...even though this is a true appeal and not a hearing de novo . The Court would then be guided by the principles in R v. Palmer , 1980 1 S.C.R. 759 at 775 where the Court said: (1) The evidence should generally not be admitted if, by due diligence, it could have been adduced at trial provided......
-
Z.G. v. Director of Child, Youth and Family Enhancement (Alta.), [2010] A.R. Uned. 852 (QB)
...v. Nikolaisen [2002] 2 S.C.R. 235 10. Kirin-Amgen Inc. v. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd. , 2000 CarswellNat 3187 11. Palmer and Palmer v. R 1980 1 S.C.R. 759 at paragraphs 24 to 28 12. R. v. Thomson , 1995 CarswellBC 1245 [End of document] ...
-
R. v. Gilliland (R.F.),
...as a factor on sentencing? b. Should the Gladue Report be admitted as fresh evidence under the test in Palmer v. The Queen , 1980 1 S.C.R. 759 (S.C.C.)? c. If the Report is admitted, is the sentence a fit sentence for this offender in the circumstances of this offence, in light of the new i......
Get Started for Free
2 firm's commentaries
-
Court Of Appeal Summaries (October 12-15, 2021)
...2021 ONCA 703 Keywords: Family Law, Child Support, Spousal Support, Civil Procedure, Fresh Evidence, Costs, Palmer v. The Queen, 1980 1 SCR 759, Family Law Rules, O. Reg. 114/99, Spousal Support Advisory Guidelines: The Revised User's Guide (April 2016), Moge v. Moge, 1992 3 SCR 813 2619506......
-
Court Of Appeal Summaries (October 12-15, 2021)
...2021 ONCA 703 Keywords: Family Law, Child Support, Spousal Support, Civil Procedure, Fresh Evidence, Costs, Palmer v. The Queen, 1980 1 SCR 759, Family Law Rules, O. Reg. 114/99, Spousal Support Advisory Guidelines: The Revised User's Guide (April 2016), Moge v. Moge, 1992 3 SCR 813 2619506......
1 books & journal articles
-
Mental Disorder 2023 Criminal Code of Canada Annotations (Part XX.1)
...being led for the first time on appeal in this case. The test for admitting fresh evidence on appeal established by R. v. Palmer, [1980] 1 S.C.R. 759 (1) The evidence should generally not be admitted if, by due diligence, it could have been adduced at trial provided that this general princi......