Richter & Associés Inc. v. Québec (Sous-ministre du Revenu) et al.

JurisdictionFederal Jurisdiction (Canada)
CourtSupreme Court (Canada)
JudgeLamer, C.J.C., L'Heureux-Dubé, Gonthier, Cory, McLachlin, Iacobucci, Major, Bastarache and Binnie, JJ.
Citation[1999] N.R. Uned. 31 (SCC),[1999] N.R. Uned. 31,182 DLR (4th) 114,[1999] 1 SCR 759,1999 CanLII 682 (SCC),24 CBR (4th) 113
Date29 April 1999
Subject MatterBANKRUPTCY,MUNICIPAL LAW,CONSTITUTIONAL LAW,CIVIL RIGHTS

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex
15 practice notes
  • Court Of Appeal Summaries (October 12-15, 2021)
    • Canada
    • Mondaq Canada
    • October 19, 2021
    ...2021 ONCA 703 Keywords: Family Law, Child Support, Spousal Support, Civil Procedure, Fresh Evidence, Costs, Palmer v. The Queen, 1980 1 SCR 759, Family Law Rules, O. Reg. 114/99, Spousal Support Advisory Guidelines: The Revised User's Guide (April 2016), Moge v. Moge, 1992 3 SCR 813 2619506......
  • Court Of Appeal Summaries (October 12-15, 2021)
    • Canada
    • Mondaq Canada
    • October 19, 2021
    ...2021 ONCA 703 Keywords: Family Law, Child Support, Spousal Support, Civil Procedure, Fresh Evidence, Costs, Palmer v. The Queen, 1980 1 SCR 759, Family Law Rules, O. Reg. 114/99, Spousal Support Advisory Guidelines: The Revised User's Guide (April 2016), Moge v. Moge, 1992 3 SCR 813 2619506......
  • Mental Disorder 2023 Criminal Code of Canada Annotations (Part XX.1)
    • Canada
    • Irwin Books Archive The 2023 Annotated Mental Health Provisions of the Criminal Code, Part XX.1
    • March 2, 2023
    ...being led for the first time on appeal in this case. The test for admitting fresh evidence on appeal established by R. v. Palmer, [1980] 1 S.C.R. 759 (1) The evidence should generally not be admitted if, by due diligence, it could have been adduced at trial provided that this general princi......
  • CIBC Mortgages Inc. v. Sicoli, 2013 ABQB 451
    • Canada
    • Court of Queen's Bench of Alberta (Canada)
    • August 9, 2013
    ...even though this is a true appeal and not a hearing de novo . The Court would then be guided by the principles in R v. Palmer , 1980 1 S.C.R. 759 at 775 where the Court said: (1) The evidence should generally not be admitted if, by due diligence, it could have been adduced at trial provided......
  • Get Started for Free
12 cases
  • CIBC Mortgages Inc. v. Sicoli, 2013 ABQB 451
    • Canada
    • Court of Queen's Bench of Alberta (Canada)
    • August 9, 2013
    ...even though this is a true appeal and not a hearing de novo . The Court would then be guided by the principles in R v. Palmer , 1980 1 S.C.R. 759 at 775 where the Court said: (1) The evidence should generally not be admitted if, by due diligence, it could have been adduced at trial provided......
  • Z.G. v. Director of Child, Youth and Family Enhancement (Alta.), [2010] A.R. Uned. 852 (QB)
    • Canada
    • Court of Queen's Bench of Alberta (Canada)
    • November 22, 2010
    ...v. Nikolaisen [2002] 2 S.C.R. 235 10. Kirin-Amgen Inc. v. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd. , 2000 CarswellNat 3187 11. Palmer and Palmer v. R 1980 1 S.C.R. 759 at paragraphs 24 to 28 12. R. v. Thomson , 1995 CarswellBC 1245 [End of document] ...
  • R. v. Gilliland (R.F.)
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (British Columbia)
    • October 2, 2014
    ...as a factor on sentencing? b. Should the Gladue Report be admitted as fresh evidence under the test in Palmer v. The Queen , 1980 1 S.C.R. 759 (S.C.C.)? c. If the Report is admitted, is the sentence a fit sentence for this offender in the circumstances of this offence, in light of the new i......
  • Big Sky Developments Ltd v Pollyco (Latimer) Ventures Ltd
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada)
    • February 27, 2025
    ...to its inclusion, arguing that it cannot meet the standard for the admission of fresh evidence on appeal expressed in R. v. Palmer, 1980 1 SCR 759, and applied by this Court in relation to appeals of Associate Judges' decisions: Humanity for Horses Foundation v. Nessel, 2022 BCSC 2198 at pa......
  • Get Started for Free
2 firm's commentaries
  • Court Of Appeal Summaries (October 12-15, 2021)
    • Canada
    • Mondaq Canada
    • October 19, 2021
    ...2021 ONCA 703 Keywords: Family Law, Child Support, Spousal Support, Civil Procedure, Fresh Evidence, Costs, Palmer v. The Queen, 1980 1 SCR 759, Family Law Rules, O. Reg. 114/99, Spousal Support Advisory Guidelines: The Revised User's Guide (April 2016), Moge v. Moge, 1992 3 SCR 813 2619506......
  • Court Of Appeal Summaries (October 12-15, 2021)
    • Canada
    • Mondaq Canada
    • October 19, 2021
    ...2021 ONCA 703 Keywords: Family Law, Child Support, Spousal Support, Civil Procedure, Fresh Evidence, Costs, Palmer v. The Queen, 1980 1 SCR 759, Family Law Rules, O. Reg. 114/99, Spousal Support Advisory Guidelines: The Revised User's Guide (April 2016), Moge v. Moge, 1992 3 SCR 813 2619506......
1 books & journal articles
  • Mental Disorder 2023 Criminal Code of Canada Annotations (Part XX.1)
    • Canada
    • Irwin Books Archive The 2023 Annotated Mental Health Provisions of the Criminal Code, Part XX.1
    • March 2, 2023
    ...being led for the first time on appeal in this case. The test for admitting fresh evidence on appeal established by R. v. Palmer, [1980] 1 S.C.R. 759 (1) The evidence should generally not be admitted if, by due diligence, it could have been adduced at trial provided that this general princi......