Ridley v. DeRose, 2017 ONCJ 877
| Jurisdiction | Ontario |
| Judge | Justice Barry M. Tobin |
| Docket Number | 138/01 |
| Court | Ontario Court of Justice General Division (Canada) |
| Date | 15 December 2017 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
2 practice notes
-
Saroli v. Grette,
...$1,500.00 per month from the structured settlement annuity. [331] However, as noted in Ridley v. DeRose, 2017 ONCJ 877, the Ontario Court of Appeal in Hunks made no findings of fact as to the source of the funds to purchase the annuity. The Court in Hunks......
-
Pereira v. De Souza,
...the circumstances of that case was held to be $32,000 monthly for four children. [101] In the case of Ridley v. DeRose, 2017 ONCJ 877, the court held that the father had not rebutted the presumption that the guidelines table amounts were inappropriate. The court ordered re......
2 cases
-
Saroli v. Grette,
...$1,500.00 per month from the structured settlement annuity. [331] However, as noted in Ridley v. DeRose, 2017 ONCJ 877, the Ontario Court of Appeal in Hunks made no findings of fact as to the source of the funds to purchase the annuity. The Court in Hunks......
-
Pereira v. De Souza,
...the circumstances of that case was held to be $32,000 monthly for four children. [101] In the case of Ridley v. DeRose, 2017 ONCJ 877, the court held that the father had not rebutted the presumption that the guidelines table amounts were inappropriate. The court ordered re......