Rinetti v Kent,

JudgeHonourable Mr. Justice R.J. Hall
Neutral Citation2022 ABQB 1
Citation2022 ABQB 1
Date04 January 2022
Docket Number4801 190106
CourtCourt of Queen's Bench of Alberta (Canada)
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
1 practice notes
  • Lemay v Lemay,
    • Canada
    • Court of King's Bench of Alberta (Canada)
    • May 24, 2023
    ...19, Justice Angotti held that 30% was not substantially equal. In Ting, Justice Harris held that 31% was not enough. In Rinetti v Kent, 2022 ABQB 1 at paras 20-21, Justice Hall held that 36% was insufficient. In interpreting the same language in the British Columbia Family Law Act, courts h......
1 cases
  • Lemay v Lemay,
    • Canada
    • Court of King's Bench of Alberta (Canada)
    • May 24, 2023
    ...19, Justice Angotti held that 30% was not substantially equal. In Ting, Justice Harris held that 31% was not enough. In Rinetti v Kent, 2022 ABQB 1 at paras 20-21, Justice Hall held that 36% was insufficient. In interpreting the same language in the British Columbia Family Law Act, courts h......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT