Rix v. Koch,
| Jurisdiction | British Columbia |
| Judge | Honourable Madam Justice D. MacDonald |
| Neutral Citation | 2021 BCSC 1526 |
| Citation | 2021 BCSC 1526 |
| Court | Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada) |
| Docket Number | M182965 |
| Date | 05 August 2021 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
5 practice notes
-
2023 BCSC 477,
...the requirement that the discretionary benefits are likely to promote rehabilitation. 64 Counsel point to the decision in Rix v. Koch, 2021 BCSC 1526, at paras. 70–72, where Justice MacDonald found that discretionary ergonomic equipment could not be deducted where the reasons for jud......
-
Fryer v Village of Nakusp,
...the requirement that the discretionary benefits are likely to promote rehabilitation. 64 Counsel point to the decision in Rix v. Koch, 2021 BCSC 1526, at paras. 70–72, where Justice MacDonald found that discretionary ergonomic equipment could not be deducted where the reasons for jud......
-
Blackburn v Lattimore,
...benefits contrary to Tench v. Van Bugnum, 2021 BCSC 501; Aarts-Chinyanta v. Harmony Premium Motors Ltd., 2020 BCSC 953; and Rix v. Koch, 2021 BCSC 1526. 42 I would not accede to these submissions. Waivers are permissible, provided their use is not to expand entitlement to benefits: see Wats......
-
2023 BCSC 246,
...Regulation outlines the benefits available to an eligible insured person regardless of who was at fault for the accident: Rix v. Koch, 2021 BCSC 1526 at para. 12. Under s. 88(1) of the Regulation, ICBC must pay benefits for all reasonable medical or rehabilitation expenses incurred by the i......
Request a trial to view additional results
5 cases
-
2023 BCSC 477,
...the requirement that the discretionary benefits are likely to promote rehabilitation. 64 Counsel point to the decision in Rix v. Koch, 2021 BCSC 1526, at paras. 70–72, where Justice MacDonald found that discretionary ergonomic equipment could not be deducted where the reasons for jud......
-
Fryer v Village of Nakusp,
...the requirement that the discretionary benefits are likely to promote rehabilitation. 64 Counsel point to the decision in Rix v. Koch, 2021 BCSC 1526, at paras. 70–72, where Justice MacDonald found that discretionary ergonomic equipment could not be deducted where the reasons for jud......
-
Blackburn v Lattimore,
...benefits contrary to Tench v. Van Bugnum, 2021 BCSC 501; Aarts-Chinyanta v. Harmony Premium Motors Ltd., 2020 BCSC 953; and Rix v. Koch, 2021 BCSC 1526. 42 I would not accede to these submissions. Waivers are permissible, provided their use is not to expand entitlement to benefits: see Wats......
-
2023 BCSC 246,
...Regulation outlines the benefits available to an eligible insured person regardless of who was at fault for the accident: Rix v. Koch, 2021 BCSC 1526 at para. 12. Under s. 88(1) of the Regulation, ICBC must pay benefits for all reasonable medical or rehabilitation expenses incurred by the i......
Request a trial to view additional results