Robak Industries Ltd. et al. v. Gardner et al., (2007) 236 B.C.A.C. 237 (CA)
Judge | Levine, Thackray and Lowry, JJ.A. |
Court | Court of Appeal (British Columbia) |
Case Date | Thursday February 01, 2007 |
Jurisdiction | British Columbia |
Citations | (2007), 236 B.C.A.C. 237 (CA);2007 BCCA 61 |
Robak Ind. Ltd. v. Gardner (2007), 236 B.C.A.C. 237 (CA);
390 W.A.C. 237
MLB headnote and full text
Temp. Cite: [2007] B.C.A.C. TBEd. FE.009
Robak Industries Ltd. and John Brent Lepinski (appellants/plaintiffs) v. Robert C. Gardner, Ross Glanville & Associates and Ross Glanville (respondents/defendants)
(CA034544; 2007 BCCA 61)
Indexed As: Robak Industries Ltd. et al. v. Gardner et al.
British Columbia Court of Appeal
Levine, Thackray and Lowry, JJ.A.
February 1, 2007.
Summary:
The defendant obtained an order striking out parts of the plaintiff's statement of claim (see [2006] B.C.T.C. Uned. 774). The plaintiff applied for directions as to whether leave to appeal was required.
The British Columbia Court of Appeal, in a decision reported at 232 B.C.A.C. 120; 385 W.A.C. 120, per Finch, C.J.B.C., held that leave to appeal was not required.
The British Columbia Court of Appeal dismissed the appeal.
Company Law - Topic 2164
Shareholders - Shareholders' rights - Derivative actions - The plaintiffs, Lepinski and his wholly-owned holding company, Robak Industries Ltd., sought damages from the defendants for alleged wrongful conduct relating to the control and management of a publicly-traded corporation, Getty Copper Inc. - Their claims included various intentional torts (conspiracy, defamation, wrongful interference with economic relations), and breaches of duties (fiduciary duties and duties of care) owed to them - The case management judge ordered that certain portions of the statement of claim be struck out on the ground that the allegations and claims made by the plaintiffs in those portions disclosed no reasonable cause of action - The chambers judge held that only the company, not individual shareholders, could sue for wrongs done to the company - The plaintiffs appealed, asserting that the principle of Foss v. Harbottle and the Canadian authorities should not be rigidly applied, but the pleadings should be construed in light of recent "refinements, rearticulations, and expressions of exceptions" to the classic principle, by "recognizing nuances in the facts and the established jurisprudence that are not inconsistent with established principles" - The British Columbia Court of Appeal dismissed the appeal - The chambers judge made no error in striking out the portions of the statement of claim - The alleged wrongs to Getty did not give rise to a cause of action on the part of either Lepinski or Robak, or permit Robak to claim as damages the loss of value in its shares of Getty.
Practice - Topic 230
Persons who can sue and be sued - Individuals and corporations - Status or standing - Shareholders - [See Company Law - Topic 2164 ].
Cases Noticed:
Foss v. Harbottle (1843), 2 Hare 461; 67 E.R. 189 (Ch.), refd to. [para. 3].
Hunt v. T & N plc et al., [1990] 2 S.C.R. 959; 117 N.R. 321, refd to. [para. 3].
Hercules Management Ltd. et al. v. Ernst & Young et al., [1997] 2 S.C.R. 165; 211 N.R. 352; 115 Man.R.(2d) 241; 139 W.A.C. 241, refd to. [para. 4].
Haig v. Bamford et al., [1977] 1 S.C.R. 466; 9 N.R. 43, refd to. [para. 4].
Rogers v. Bank of Montreal, [1987] 2 W.W.R. 364; 9 B.C.L.R.(2d) 190 (C.A.), affing. (1985), 64 B.C.L.R. 63 (S.C.), refd to. [para. 4].
Johnson v. Gore Wood & Co., [2002] 1 A.C. 1 (H.L.), refd to. [para. 4].
Prudential Assurance Co. v. Newman Industries Ltd. and others (No. 2), [1982] 1 All E.R. 354 (C.A.), refd to. [para. 11].
Howard and Witchell v. Woodman Matthews, [1983] B.C.L.C. 117 (C.A.), refd to. [para. 18].
Heron International v. Gradem (Lord), [1983] B.C.L.C. 244 (C.A.), refd to. [para. 18].
Fischer (George) (Great Britain) Ltd. v. Multi Construction Ltd. and Dexion Ltd. (third party), [1995] 1 B.C.L.C. 260 (C.A.), refd to. [para. 18].
Barings v. Coopers & Lybrand, [1996] E.W.J. No. 706 (C.A.), refd to. [para. 18].
Gerber Garment Technology Inc. v. Lectra Systems Ltd., [1997] R.P.C. 443 (C.A.), refd to. [para. 18].
Christensen v. Scott, [1996] 1 N.Z.L.R. 273 (C.A.), refd to. [para. 18].
Stein v. Blake, [1998] 1 All E.R. 724 (C.A.), refd to. [para. 25].
Meditrust Healthcare Inc. v. Shoppers Drug Mart et al. (2002), 165 O.A.C. 147; 220 D.L.R.(4th) 611 (C.A.), refd to. [para. 29].
Goldex Mines Ltd. v. Revill et al. (1974), 7 O.R.(2d) 216 (C.A.), refd to. [para. 33].
Green v. Victor Talking Mach. Co. (1928), 24 F.2d 378 (C.A., 2nd Cir.), refd to. [para. 33].
Gardner v. Parker, [2004] 2 B.C.L.C. 554 (C.A.), refd to. [para. 37].
Thomas v. D'Arcy, [2005] QCA 68 (Aust. C.A.), refd to. [para. 37].
Counsel:
H. Shapray, Q.C., for the appellants;
J. Sheilds, for R.C. Gardner;
R. McFee, Q.C., and M. Buhler, for R. Glanville.
This appeal was heard on January 8 and 9, 2007, at Vancouver, B.C., by Levine, Thackray and Lowry, JJ.A., of the British Columbia Court of Appeal. The following judgment of the Court of Appeal was delivered by Levine, J.A., on February 1, 2007.
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Introduction
...106, would be an example of such an independent wrong. 169 Robak Industries Ltd. v. Gardner, 2006 BCSC 1538 [Robak (Sup. Ct.)] aff’d in 2007 BCCA 61 [Robak 296 T H E C A N A DI A N CL A SS ACTION RE VIE W them involving wrongs committed to the company, they suffered a loss in the value of t......
-
Seeking Recognition of Canadian Class Action Judgments in Foreign Jurisdictions: Perils and Pitfalls
...106, would be an example of such an independent wrong. 169 Robak Industries Ltd. v. Gardner, 2006 BCSC 1538 [Robak (Sup. Ct.)] aff’d in 2007 BCCA 61 [Robak 296 T H E C A N A DI A N CL A SS ACTION RE VIE W them involving wrongs committed to the company, they suffered a loss in the value of t......
-
Adapting to Climate Change: A Look at Three Controversial Developments That Are Heating Up the Canadian Class Action Debate
...106, would be an example of such an independent wrong. 169 Robak Industries Ltd. v. Gardner, 2006 BCSC 1538 [Robak (Sup. Ct.)] aff’d in 2007 BCCA 61 [Robak 296 T H E C A N A DI A N CL A SS ACTION RE VIE W them involving wrongs committed to the company, they suffered a loss in the value of t......
-
Shareholder Class Actions in Ontario: Putting John C. Coffee, Jr.’s Findings to the Test
...106, would be an example of such an independent wrong. 169 Robak Industries Ltd. v. Gardner, 2006 BCSC 1538 [Robak (Sup. Ct.)] aff’d in 2007 BCCA 61 [Robak 296 T H E C A N A DI A N CL A SS ACTION RE VIE W them involving wrongs committed to the company, they suffered a loss in the value of t......
-
Everest Canadian Properties Ltd. et al. v. Mallmann et al., 2008 BCCA 276
...et al. (No. 2), [1982] 1 All E.R. 354; [1982] 2 W.L.R. 31 (C.A.), consd. [para. 21]. Robak Industries Ltd. et al. v. Gardner et al. (2007), 236 B.C.A.C. 237; 390 W.A.C. 237; 28 B.L.R.(4th) 1; 2007 BCCA 61, consd. [para. Hercules Management Ltd. et al. v. Ernst & Young et al., [1997] 2 S......
-
Mayer v. Mayer et al., 2012 BCCA 77
...49; 434 W.A.C. 49; 82 B.C.L.R.(4th) 230; 2008 BCCA 276, refd to. [para. 106]. Robak Industries Ltd. et al. v. Gardner et al. (2007), 236 B.C.A.C. 237; 390 W.A.C. 237; 65 B.C.L.R.(4th) 62; 2007 BCCA 61, refd to. [para. Shaker v. Al-Bedrawi, [2002] 4 All E.R. 835; [2002] EWCA Civ. 1452, refd ......
-
Grenon v. Canada Revenue Agency et al., 2016 ABQB 260
...and must have an independent loss separate from that suffered by the corporation or association. See Robak Industries Ltd v Gardner , 2007 BCCA 61, 65 BCLR (4th) 62 at para 38. [131] The application of the Rule in Foss v Harbottle to the beneficiary of a trust presents an additional issue. ......
-
1043325 Ontario Ltd. v. CSA Building Sciences Western Ltd. et al., (2016) 389 B.C.A.C. 161 (CA)
...v. Ernst & Young , [1997] 2 S.C.R. 165; Rogers v. Bank of Montreal (1986) 9 B.C.L.R.(2d) 190 (C.A.); Robak Industries Ltd. v. Gardner 2007 BCCA 61.) As was recently observed in Rea v. Wildeboer 2015 ONCA 373, this "handicap" was the result of two well-entrenched principles of corporate ......
-
Court Of Appeal Summaries (July 6 ' 10, 2020)
...525, George Fischer (Great Britain) Ltd v. Multi Construction Ltd. (1994), [1995] B.C.C. 310 (C.A.), Robak Industries Ltd. v. Gardner, 2007 BCCA 61, BCE Inc. v. 1976 Debentureholders, 2008 SCC 69, Chevron Corp. v. Yaiguaje, 2015 SCC 42, Saramia Crescent General Partner Inc. v. Delco Wire an......
-
Fiduciary Duties In Commercial Relationships And Conflicts Of Interest: Roussy v. Savage, 2019 BCSC 1669
...shareholder suffered an "independent loss" separate from any loss suffered by the company (relying on Robak Industries Ltd. v. Gardner, 2007 BCCA 61). The plaintiffs alleged their "independent relationship" with TS was a fiduciary one, arising under the law of partnership and by virtue of t......
-
Shareholder Actions For Loss Of Share Value Evolution Of Ontario Corporate Law
...and British Columbia, including Meditrust Healthcare Inc. v. Shoppers Drug Mart [2002] O.J. No. 3891 and Robak Industries Ltd. v. Gardner 2007 BCCA 61, the Court of Appeal in Tran v. Farms 2020 ONCA 440 held that the Second Proposition from Johnson "fits consistently into a legal framework ......
-
Can Shareholders Sue Personally For Losses In Company Share Value?
...including Meditrust Healthcare Inc. v. Shoppers Drug Mart (2002), 220 D.L.R. (4th) 611 (Ont. C.A.) and Robak Industries Ltd. v. Gardner, 2007 BCCA 61, the Court of in Bloorston Farms held that the Second Proposition from Johnson "fits consistently into a legal framework that is otherwise co......
-
Introduction
...106, would be an example of such an independent wrong. 169 Robak Industries Ltd. v. Gardner, 2006 BCSC 1538 [Robak (Sup. Ct.)] aff’d in 2007 BCCA 61 [Robak 296 T H E C A N A DI A N CL A SS ACTION RE VIE W them involving wrongs committed to the company, they suffered a loss in the value of t......
-
Seeking Recognition of Canadian Class Action Judgments in Foreign Jurisdictions: Perils and Pitfalls
...106, would be an example of such an independent wrong. 169 Robak Industries Ltd. v. Gardner, 2006 BCSC 1538 [Robak (Sup. Ct.)] aff’d in 2007 BCCA 61 [Robak 296 T H E C A N A DI A N CL A SS ACTION RE VIE W them involving wrongs committed to the company, they suffered a loss in the value of t......
-
Adapting to Climate Change: A Look at Three Controversial Developments That Are Heating Up the Canadian Class Action Debate
...106, would be an example of such an independent wrong. 169 Robak Industries Ltd. v. Gardner, 2006 BCSC 1538 [Robak (Sup. Ct.)] aff’d in 2007 BCCA 61 [Robak 296 T H E C A N A DI A N CL A SS ACTION RE VIE W them involving wrongs committed to the company, they suffered a loss in the value of t......
-
Shareholder Class Actions in Ontario: Putting John C. Coffee, Jr.’s Findings to the Test
...106, would be an example of such an independent wrong. 169 Robak Industries Ltd. v. Gardner, 2006 BCSC 1538 [Robak (Sup. Ct.)] aff’d in 2007 BCCA 61 [Robak 296 T H E C A N A DI A N CL A SS ACTION RE VIE W them involving wrongs committed to the company, they suffered a loss in the value of t......