Rodrigues v. Purtill, 2019 ONCA 740
| Jurisdiction | Ontario |
| Judge | Strathy C.J.O., MacPherson and Tulloch JJ.A. |
| Citation | 2019 ONCA 740 |
| Date | 20 September 2019 |
| Court | Court of Appeal (Ontario) |
| Docket Number | C65676 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
7 practice notes
-
Court Of Appeal Summaries (June 21 ' 25)
...of Toronto, [1995] 2 S.C.R. 1130 , Fiddler v. Chiavetti, 2010 ONCA 210 , Vokes Estate v. Palmer, 2012 ONCA 510 , Rodrigues v. Purtill, 2019 ONCA 740, Gervais v. Richard (1984), 48 O.R. (2d) 191 (H.C.), Mason v. Peters (1982), 139 D.L.R. (3d) 104 (Ont. C.A.), Rodrigues v. Purtill, 20......
-
COURT OF APPEAL SUMMARIES (JUNE 21 – 25)
...of Toronto, [1995] 2 S.C.R. 1130 , Fiddler v. Chiavetti, 2010 ONCA 210 , Vokes Estate v. Palmer, 2012 ONCA 510 , Rodrigues v. Purtill, 2019 ONCA 740, Gervais v. Richard (1984), 48 O.R. (2d) 191 (H.C.), Mason v. Peters (1982), 139 D.L.R. (3d) 104 (Ont. C.A.), Rodrigues v. Purtill, 20......
-
Court Of Appeal Summaries (September 16-20)
...and campaign materials of hundreds of aspiring candidates, and the reciprocal engagement of many informed voters. Rodrigues v. Purtill, 2019 ONCA 740 [Strathy CJO, MacPherson and Tulloch TJ McCarthy and RJ Campbell, for the appellant BLP JC Lisus and Z Naqi, for the respondents Facts: This ......
-
Mundinger v. Ashton, 2019 ONSC 7161
...s. 4.3 of the Regulation was recently addressed, but not decided, by the Ontario Court of Appeal in the case of Rodrigues v. Purtill, 2019 ONCA 740. In that case, the appellant argued that the trial judge improperly considered the evidence of a registered psychologist and a specialist in th......
Request a trial to view additional results
4 cases
-
Mundinger v. Ashton, 2019 ONSC 7161
...s. 4.3 of the Regulation was recently addressed, but not decided, by the Ontario Court of Appeal in the case of Rodrigues v. Purtill, 2019 ONCA 740. In that case, the appellant argued that the trial judge improperly considered the evidence of a registered psychologist and a specialist in th......
-
Moore v. 7595611 Canada Corp.,
...in To as “the high end of an accepted range for guidance, care and companionship damages.” See also Rodrigues v. Purtill, 2019 ONCA 740, at para. 14. Properly adjusted for inflation using the consumer price index, the damages in Fiddler were decreased from $200,000 to $125,000......
-
Zmarzly v. Huang,
...Ontario has recognized that the evidence of a psychologist may be accepted under s. 4.3 of the Regulation. (See: Rodrigues v. Purtill, 2019 ONCA 740 (CanLII), at paras [194] Section 4.3(5) of O. Reg. 461/96 requires Mr. Zmarzly to adduce evidence that cor......
-
Sanson v. Paterson,
...under s. 4.3 of the Regulation. [443] While it appears, for example in light of Rogrigues v. Purtill (2019 ONCA 740), that the question of whether or not a psychologist qualifies as a “physician” under s. 4.3 of the Regulation is not quite a......
3 firm's commentaries
-
Court Of Appeal Summaries (June 21 ' 25)
...of Toronto, [1995] 2 S.C.R. 1130 , Fiddler v. Chiavetti, 2010 ONCA 210 , Vokes Estate v. Palmer, 2012 ONCA 510 , Rodrigues v. Purtill, 2019 ONCA 740, Gervais v. Richard (1984), 48 O.R. (2d) 191 (H.C.), Mason v. Peters (1982), 139 D.L.R. (3d) 104 (Ont. C.A.), Rodrigues v. Purtill, 20......
-
COURT OF APPEAL SUMMARIES (JUNE 21 – 25)
...of Toronto, [1995] 2 S.C.R. 1130 , Fiddler v. Chiavetti, 2010 ONCA 210 , Vokes Estate v. Palmer, 2012 ONCA 510 , Rodrigues v. Purtill, 2019 ONCA 740, Gervais v. Richard (1984), 48 O.R. (2d) 191 (H.C.), Mason v. Peters (1982), 139 D.L.R. (3d) 104 (Ont. C.A.), Rodrigues v. Purtill, 20......
-
Court Of Appeal Summaries (September 16-20)
...and campaign materials of hundreds of aspiring candidates, and the reciprocal engagement of many informed voters. Rodrigues v. Purtill, 2019 ONCA 740 [Strathy CJO, MacPherson and Tulloch TJ McCarthy and RJ Campbell, for the appellant BLP JC Lisus and Z Naqi, for the respondents Facts: This ......