Rogers Wireless Inc. v. Muroff, 2007 SCC 35

JurisdictionFederal Jurisdiction (Canada)
JudgeMcLachlin, Beverley; Binnie, William Ian Corneil; LeBel, Louis; Fish, Morris J.; Abella, Rosalie Silberman; Charron, Louise; Rothstein, Marshall
Citation2007 SCC 35,[2007] 2 SCR 921,JE 2007-1409,36 BLR (4th) 79,365 NR 177,EYB 2007-121974,284 DLR (4th) 675,[2007] SCJ No 35 (QL)
Date13 July 2007
Subject MatterARBITRATION
CourtSupreme Court (Canada)
Docket Number31383
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
72 practice notes
  • Seidel v. Telus Communications Inc., (2011) 301 B.C.A.C. 1 (SCC)
    • Canada
    • Canada (Federal) Supreme Court (Canada)
    • May 12, 2010
    ...des consommateurs et al., [2007] 2 S.C.R. 801 ; 366 N.R. 1 ; 2007 SCC 34 , refd to. [paras. 4, 65]. Muroff v. Rogers Wireless Inc., [2007] 2 S.C.R. 921; 365 N.R. 177 ; 2007 SCC 35 , refd to. [paras. 12, MacKinnon v. National Money Mart Co. et al. (2004), 203 B.C.A.C. 103 ; 332 W.A.C.......
  • Peace River Hydro Partners v. Petrowest Corp., 2022 SCC 41
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court (Canada)
    • November 10, 2022
    ...2 S.C.R. 144; Seidel v. TELUS Communications Inc., 2011 SCC 15, [2011] 1 S.C.R. 531; Rogers Wireless Inc. v. Muroff, 2007 SCC 35, [2007] 2 S.C.R. 921; In re U.S. Lines, Inc., 197 F.3d 631 (1999); Societe Nationale Algerienne v. Distrigas Corp., 80 B.R. 606 (1987); Astoria Medical Group v. H......
  • Uber Technologies Inc. v. Heller, 2020 SCC 16
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court (Canada)
    • June 26, 2020
    ...S.C.R. 801 ; Seidel v. TELUS Communications Inc., 2011 SCC 15 , [2011] 1 S.C.R. 531 ; Rogers Wireless Inc. v. Muroff, 2007 SCC 35 , [2007] 2 S.C.R. 921; Trainor v. Fundstream Inc., 2019 ABQB 800 ; Alberta Medical Association v. Alberta, 2012 ABQB 113 , 537 A.R. 75 ; A. v. B. (No.2), ......
  • Seidel v. Telus Communications Inc., (2011) 412 N.R. 195 (SCC)
    • Canada
    • Canada (Federal) Supreme Court (Canada)
    • May 12, 2010
    ...des consommateurs et al., [2007] 2 S.C.R. 801 ; 366 N.R. 1 ; 2007 SCC 34 , refd to. [paras. 4, 65]. Muroff v. Rogers Wireless Inc., [2007] 2 S.C.R. 921; 365 N.R. 177 ; 2007 SCC 35 , refd to. [paras. 12, MacKinnon v. National Money Mart Co. et al. (2004), 203 B.C.A.C. 103 ; 332 W.A.C.......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
41 cases
  • Seidel v. Telus Communications Inc., (2011) 301 B.C.A.C. 1 (SCC)
    • Canada
    • Canada (Federal) Supreme Court (Canada)
    • May 12, 2010
    ...des consommateurs et al., [2007] 2 S.C.R. 801 ; 366 N.R. 1 ; 2007 SCC 34 , refd to. [paras. 4, 65]. Muroff v. Rogers Wireless Inc., [2007] 2 S.C.R. 921; 365 N.R. 177 ; 2007 SCC 35 , refd to. [paras. 12, MacKinnon v. National Money Mart Co. et al. (2004), 203 B.C.A.C. 103 ; 332 W.A.C.......
  • Seidel v. Telus Communications Inc., (2011) 412 N.R. 195 (SCC)
    • Canada
    • Canada (Federal) Supreme Court (Canada)
    • May 12, 2010
    ...des consommateurs et al., [2007] 2 S.C.R. 801 ; 366 N.R. 1 ; 2007 SCC 34 , refd to. [paras. 4, 65]. Muroff v. Rogers Wireless Inc., [2007] 2 S.C.R. 921; 365 N.R. 177 ; 2007 SCC 35 , refd to. [paras. 12, MacKinnon v. National Money Mart Co. et al. (2004), 203 B.C.A.C. 103 ; 332 W.A.C.......
  • Uber Technologies Inc. v. Heller, 2020 SCC 16
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court (Canada)
    • June 26, 2020
    ...S.C.R. 801 ; Seidel v. TELUS Communications Inc., 2011 SCC 15 , [2011] 1 S.C.R. 531 ; Rogers Wireless Inc. v. Muroff, 2007 SCC 35 , [2007] 2 S.C.R. 921; Trainor v. Fundstream Inc., 2019 ABQB 800 ; Alberta Medical Association v. Alberta, 2012 ABQB 113 , 537 A.R. 75 ; A. v. B. (No.2), ......
  • Peace River Hydro Partners v. Petrowest Corp., 2022 SCC 41
    • Canada
    • Supreme Court (Canada)
    • November 10, 2022
    ...2 S.C.R. 144; Seidel v. TELUS Communications Inc., 2011 SCC 15, [2011] 1 S.C.R. 531; Rogers Wireless Inc. v. Muroff, 2007 SCC 35, [2007] 2 S.C.R. 921; In re U.S. Lines, Inc., 197 F.3d 631 (1999); Societe Nationale Algerienne v. Distrigas Corp., 80 B.R. 606 (1987); Astoria Medical Group v. H......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
3 firm's commentaries
28 books & journal articles
  • Waiving Goodbye: The Rise and Imminent Fall of Waiver of Tort in Class Proceedings
    • Canada
    • Irwin Books The Canadian Class Action Review No. 6-1, April 2010
    • April 1, 2010
    ...mechanisms established under Quebec’s labour law. Dell Computer Corp. v. Union des consommateurs47 and Rogers Wireless Inc. v. Muroff, [2007] 2 S.C.R. 921. As noted above, the Supreme Court of Canada again emphasized that class actions were only procedural devices, and did not alter or exte......
  • Strategies to Avoid Or Mitigate Class Action Litigation
    • Canada
    • Irwin Books The Canadian Class Action Review No. 6-1, April 2010
    • April 1, 2010
    ...mechanisms established under Quebec’s labour law. Dell Computer Corp. v. Union des consommateurs47 and Rogers Wireless Inc. v. Muroff, [2007] 2 S.C.R. 921. As noted above, the Supreme Court of Canada again emphasized that class actions were only procedural devices, and did not alter or exte......
  • Preliminary Merits Review for Class Actions in Ontario: Thanks, But No Thanks!
    • Canada
    • Irwin Books The Canadian Class Action Review No. 6-1, April 2010
    • April 1, 2010
    ...mechanisms established under Quebec’s labour law. Dell Computer Corp. v. Union des consommateurs47 and Rogers Wireless Inc. v. Muroff, [2007] 2 S.C.R. 921. As noted above, the Supreme Court of Canada again emphasized that class actions were only procedural devices, and did not alter or exte......
  • Speaking the Class Action, Thinking the Class Action: A Discussion of Changing Trends in Quebec's Class Action Lexicon
    • Canada
    • Irwin Books The Canadian Class Action Review No. 6-1, April 2010
    • April 1, 2010
    ...mechanisms established under Quebec’s labour law. Dell Computer Corp. v. Union des consommateurs47 and Rogers Wireless Inc. v. Muroff, [2007] 2 S.C.R. 921. As noted above, the Supreme Court of Canada again emphasized that class actions were only procedural devices, and did not alter or exte......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT