ROMANCHUK v. JEMI FIBRE CORP., 2018 SKQB 46
| Jurisdiction | Saskatchewan |
| Judge | GOEBEL J. |
| Citation | 2018 SKQB 46 |
| Date | 02 February 2018 |
| Court | Court of Queen's Bench of Saskatchewan (Canada) |
| Docket Number | QB 83 of 2017 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
3 practice notes
-
Blonde Ambition Investments Inc. v Rjm Ventures LLC, 2019 SKQB 275
...the court that the alternative jurisdiction is clearly the more appropriate forum. In the recent case of Romanchuk v Jemi Fibre Corp 2018 SKQB 46 the Court reiterated Konkin J description of the standard of proof in the case of Cupola Investments Inc. V. Remai 2016 SKQB 359 at para 15 and 1......
-
ELLES v. ELLES,
...same, these are all factors that weigh heavily in favour of consolidation: Brass v LeRoux, 2006 SKQB 336; Romanchuk v Jemi Fibre Corp., 2018 SKQB 46, 19 CPC (8th) [114] However, where the main issues in the actions are independent, and an order for consolidation would lead to delay and inco......
-
DISTINCT HOMES INC. v. ANINDO, 2020 SKQB 158
...As noted by Goebel J. in Romanchuk v Jemi Fibre Corp., 2018 SKQB 46, 19 CPC (8th) 385, when considering an argument of multiplicity, the circumstances must be considered contextually and justice is often promoted by the consolidation of two actions, rather than striking one or the other. [2......
3 cases
-
Blonde Ambition Investments Inc. v Rjm Ventures LLC, 2019 SKQB 275
...the court that the alternative jurisdiction is clearly the more appropriate forum. In the recent case of Romanchuk v Jemi Fibre Corp 2018 SKQB 46 the Court reiterated Konkin J description of the standard of proof in the case of Cupola Investments Inc. V. Remai 2016 SKQB 359 at para 15 and 1......
-
ELLES v. ELLES,
...same, these are all factors that weigh heavily in favour of consolidation: Brass v LeRoux, 2006 SKQB 336; Romanchuk v Jemi Fibre Corp., 2018 SKQB 46, 19 CPC (8th) [114] However, where the main issues in the actions are independent, and an order for consolidation would lead to delay and inco......
-
DISTINCT HOMES INC. v. ANINDO, 2020 SKQB 158
...As noted by Goebel J. in Romanchuk v Jemi Fibre Corp., 2018 SKQB 46, 19 CPC (8th) 385, when considering an argument of multiplicity, the circumstances must be considered contextually and justice is often promoted by the consolidation of two actions, rather than striking one or the other. [2......