Romania v. Boros, 2020 ONCA 216
| Jurisdiction | Ontario |
| Judge | Strathy C.J.O., Miller and Trotter JJ.A. |
| Citation | 2020 ONCA 216 |
| Court | Court of Appeal (Ontario) |
| Docket Number | C66606 |
| Date | 20 March 2020 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
8 practice notes
-
Court Of Appeal Summaries (March 16 March 20, 2020)
...Adan, 2019 ONCA 709, R. v. M.W., 2017 ONCA 22, R. v. Wilson, 2020 ONCA 3, R. v. Kinnear (2005), 199 O.A.C. 323 (ONCA) Romania v. Boros, 2020 ONCA 216 Keywords: Criminal Law, Extradition, Extradition Act, s. 15, 29(1)(a), 44(1)(a), 57(6), Lake v. Canada (Minister of Justice), 2008 SCC 23, Ca......
-
CST JAY PIERSON v. ESTEVAN BOARD OF POLICE COMMISSIONERS and WORKERS’ COMPENSATION BOARD, 2020 SKQB 144
...In this regard, the reasoning behind the decision is expected to demonstrate the required transparency. See also Romania v Boros, 2020 ONCA 216. [58] As noted in para. 85 above, the majority in Vavilov described a reasonable decision as one based on “an internally coherent and rational chai......
-
Rutayisire v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration),
...the required assessment: Vancouver Airport Authority v PSAC, 2010 FCA 158, [2011] 4 FCR 425, at paras 13-14 and 16(d); Romania v Boros, 2020 ONCA 216, at paras 29-30; Kanthasamy, at para 25. [75] Accordingly, I conclude that the applicant has not demonstrated that the officer failed to carr......
-
Canada (Attorney General) on behalf of the United States of America v Tyndall,
...[58] Surrender decisions under the Extradition Act remain subject to review for reasonableness post-Vavilov: see, eg, Romania v Boros, 2020 ONCA 216 at para 18; Beaumann v Canada (Minister of Justice), 2020 BCCA 124 at para 51. However, the Supreme Court in Vavilov clarified how a reasonabl......
Request a trial to view additional results
7 cases
-
CST JAY PIERSON v. ESTEVAN BOARD OF POLICE COMMISSIONERS and WORKERS’ COMPENSATION BOARD, 2020 SKQB 144
...In this regard, the reasoning behind the decision is expected to demonstrate the required transparency. See also Romania v Boros, 2020 ONCA 216. [58] As noted in para. 85 above, the majority in Vavilov described a reasonable decision as one based on “an internally coherent and rational chai......
-
Rutayisire v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration),
...the required assessment: Vancouver Airport Authority v PSAC, 2010 FCA 158, [2011] 4 FCR 425, at paras 13-14 and 16(d); Romania v Boros, 2020 ONCA 216, at paras 29-30; Kanthasamy, at para 25. [75] Accordingly, I conclude that the applicant has not demonstrated that the officer failed to carr......
-
Canada (Attorney General) on behalf of the United States of America v Tyndall,
...[58] Surrender decisions under the Extradition Act remain subject to review for reasonableness post-Vavilov: see, eg, Romania v Boros, 2020 ONCA 216 at para 18; Beaumann v Canada (Minister of Justice), 2020 BCCA 124 at para 51. However, the Supreme Court in Vavilov clarified how a reasonabl......
-
Canada (Attorney General) v. Angell, 2020 FC 1093
...The Court of Appeal for Ontario recently set aside an administrative decision owing to concerns about transparency in Romania v Boros, 2020 ONCA 216. A little background is needed to understand the decision. Ms Boros was convicted in absentia of offences in Romania. Years later, Romania req......
Request a trial to view additional results
1 firm's commentaries
-
Court Of Appeal Summaries (March 16 March 20, 2020)
...Adan, 2019 ONCA 709, R. v. M.W., 2017 ONCA 22, R. v. Wilson, 2020 ONCA 3, R. v. Kinnear (2005), 199 O.A.C. 323 (ONCA) Romania v. Boros, 2020 ONCA 216 Keywords: Criminal Law, Extradition, Extradition Act, s. 15, 29(1)(a), 44(1)(a), 57(6), Lake v. Canada (Minister of Justice), 2008 SCC 23, Ca......