Romania v. Boros

JurisdictionOntario
CourtCourt of Appeal (Ontario)
JudgeStrathy C.J.O., Miller and Trotter JJ.A.
Citation2020 ONCA 216
Date20 March 2020
Docket NumberC66606

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex
8 practice notes
  • Court Of Appeal Summaries (March 16 – March 20, 2020)
    • Canada
    • Mondaq Canada
    • April 1, 2020
    ...Adan, 2019 ONCA 709, R. v. M.W., 2017 ONCA 22, R. v. Wilson, 2020 ONCA 3, R. v. Kinnear (2005), 199 O.A.C. 323 (ONCA) Romania v. Boros, 2020 ONCA 216 Keywords: Criminal Law, Extradition, Extradition Act, s. 15, 29(1)(a), 44(1)(a), 57(6), Lake v. Canada (Minister of Justice), 2008 SCC 23, Ca......
  • CST JAY PIERSON v. ESTEVAN BOARD OF POLICE COMMISSIONERS and WORKERS’ COMPENSATION BOARD
    • Canada
    • Court of Queen's Bench of Saskatchewan (Canada)
    • May 13, 2020
    ...In this regard, the reasoning behind the decision is expected to demonstrate the required transparency. See also Romania v Boros, 2020 ONCA 216. [58] As noted in para. 85 above, the majority in Vavilov described a reasonable decision as one based on “an internally coherent and rational chai......
  • Rutayisire v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration)
    • Canada
    • Federal Court (Canada)
    • September 21, 2021
    ...the required assessment: Vancouver Airport Authority v PSAC, 2010 FCA 158, [2011] 4 FCR 425, at paras 13-14 and 16(d); Romania v Boros, 2020 ONCA 216, at paras 29-30; Kanthasamy, at para 25. [75] Accordingly, I conclude that the applicant has not demonstrated that the officer failed to carr......
  • United States v. Akinbobola
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (Ontario)
    • January 20, 2022
    ...using the standard of reasonableness due to the Minister’s expertise in relation to Canada’s international obligations: Romania v. Boros, 2020 ONCA 216, 150 O.R. (3d) 158. The decision to surrender is an exercise of discretion, and the reviewing court is not entitled to re-weigh the facts a......
  • Get Started for Free
7 cases
  • CST JAY PIERSON v. ESTEVAN BOARD OF POLICE COMMISSIONERS and WORKERS’ COMPENSATION BOARD
    • Canada
    • Court of Queen's Bench of Saskatchewan (Canada)
    • May 13, 2020
    ...In this regard, the reasoning behind the decision is expected to demonstrate the required transparency. See also Romania v Boros, 2020 ONCA 216. [58] As noted in para. 85 above, the majority in Vavilov described a reasonable decision as one based on “an internally coherent and rational chai......
  • Rutayisire v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration)
    • Canada
    • Federal Court (Canada)
    • September 21, 2021
    ...the required assessment: Vancouver Airport Authority v PSAC, 2010 FCA 158, [2011] 4 FCR 425, at paras 13-14 and 16(d); Romania v Boros, 2020 ONCA 216, at paras 29-30; Kanthasamy, at para 25. [75] Accordingly, I conclude that the applicant has not demonstrated that the officer failed to carr......
  • United States v. Akinbobola
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (Ontario)
    • January 20, 2022
    ...using the standard of reasonableness due to the Minister’s expertise in relation to Canada’s international obligations: Romania v. Boros, 2020 ONCA 216, 150 O.R. (3d) 158. The decision to surrender is an exercise of discretion, and the reviewing court is not entitled to re-weigh the facts a......
  • Canada (Attorney General) on behalf of the United States of America v Tyndall
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (Alberta)
    • March 15, 2021
    ...[58] Surrender decisions under the Extradition Act remain subject to review for reasonableness post-Vavilov: see, eg, Romania v Boros, 2020 ONCA 216 at para 18; Beaumann v Canada (Minister of Justice), 2020 BCCA 124 at para 51. However, the Supreme Court in Vavilov clarified how a reasonabl......
  • Get Started for Free
1 firm's commentaries
  • Court Of Appeal Summaries (March 16 – March 20, 2020)
    • Canada
    • Mondaq Canada
    • April 1, 2020
    ...Adan, 2019 ONCA 709, R. v. M.W., 2017 ONCA 22, R. v. Wilson, 2020 ONCA 3, R. v. Kinnear (2005), 199 O.A.C. 323 (ONCA) Romania v. Boros, 2020 ONCA 216 Keywords: Criminal Law, Extradition, Extradition Act, s. 15, 29(1)(a), 44(1)(a), 57(6), Lake v. Canada (Minister of Justice), 2008 SCC 23, Ca......